Common tactic seems to be to take a claim made, add some superfluous detail and pick at that. If they can unravel one small piece, they consider the whole thing "debunked."
Examples:
Georgia election video, they picked at the usage of the word "suitcase" that some people used, ignoring the larger claims
Wayfair, found one of the missing girls that claimed to be alive, did no investigation of any of the sellers named to confirm above board dealings (I'm not sure I believe this one personally, but they did NOT debunk or investigate it.)
Now, this one, Harrison Deal, they picked at one theory (of many) that it was related to a specific video, no investigation
I'm not saying I believe it being deeebooonked.
I think it's very fishy that Brian Kemp is at the foot of this... Especially with how he has been compromised- bought by China. Man has no upstanding morals, wouldn't put it past him. Plus no one else was reported in that accident, explain to me that coincidence.
Common tactic seems to be to take a claim made, add some superfluous detail and pick at that. If they can unravel one small piece, they consider the whole thing "debunked."
Examples:
I'm not saying I believe it being deeebooonked. I think it's very fishy that Brian Kemp is at the foot of this... Especially with how he has been compromised- bought by China. Man has no upstanding morals, wouldn't put it past him. Plus no one else was reported in that accident, explain to me that coincidence.