My thinking on this is would the government really want to kill off all their sheep? All you would have left is everyone who doesn't fall for their bullshit and is not easily controlled. What if this vaccination were to actually protect you from a much deadlier virus they will release later?
Another idea I had is that this is just a big PR stunt/money grab from big pharma. Lots and lots of people have been waking up to how bad vaccines are. What if this one is intentionally safer than most, to convince everyone that vaccines are miracles. As soon as a good enough amount of the population gets one, suddenly the virus will be "gone" (from the media), life will return back to normal; big pharma saved the day.
The second seems more accurate, especially since they're billing it as a "subscription" type deal where you need yearly boosters just like the flu vaccine. It also lines up with the "you'll never own anything again and like it" mindset where you're constantly renting or paying a subscription for everything.
It wouldn't surprise me at all if the trials they did are all intentionally fucked up in order to make anyone that doesn't want to take the shot later, where it's basically just saline because the thing it's trying to cure is easy to get over, can be pushed even further out and made to look stupid. Two birds with one stone.
My thinking on this is would the government really want to kill off all their sheep? All you would have left is everyone who doesn't fall for their bullshit and is not easily controlled. What if this vaccination were to actually protect you from a much deadlier virus they will release later?
Another idea I had is that this is just a big PR stunt/money grab from big pharma. Lots and lots of people have been waking up to how bad vaccines are. What if this one is intentionally safer than most, to convince everyone that vaccines are miracles. As soon as a good enough amount of the population gets one, suddenly the virus will be "gone" (from the media), life will return back to normal; big pharma saved the day.
The second seems more accurate, especially since they're billing it as a "subscription" type deal where you need yearly boosters just like the flu vaccine. It also lines up with the "you'll never own anything again and like it" mindset where you're constantly renting or paying a subscription for everything.
It wouldn't surprise me at all if the trials they did are all intentionally fucked up in order to make anyone that doesn't want to take the shot later, where it's basically just saline because the thing it's trying to cure is easy to get over, can be pushed even further out and made to look stupid. Two birds with one stone.