There is lots of proof that we've all seen, especially over at TheDonald... The thing is, it's definitely more than enough to at least get a case heard... they haven't even had a chance to prove it in court yet, because the judges keep dismissing the case based on some lame technicality. Seems like obvious corruption to us. They said Texas wasn't hurt by the fraud in the other states so they aren't allow to sue. I think Texas and its voters are obviously hurt by them electing a fraudulent president, if that is the case. The SCOTUS definitely should've heard that case, but they are compromised. They may just not want to have to decide the fate of the election.

As far as Rudy saying "no we are not alleging fraud", it was because in that particular lawsuit, they were not alleging fraud, they were going after them breaking the election laws. In the other lawsuits, they are alleging fraud. Just not that one.