Your points aren't worth countering. I'm just saying you're a fool to think that the news is telling the whole truth and not trying to get you to think exactly how you are. You know full well that journalism is dead yet you challenge nothing you read. You have no idea what weapon was used beyond what someone who may know nothing about guns told you. You may be being purposely misled to push an agenda and that's where YOUR knowledge of firearms is important. Every gun could be an AK-47 to someone who doesn't know firearms fronm their ass.
My original point still stands. Show me that automatic weapons were used. Just because something looks scary doesnt make it an "assault weapon". Its been a couple days.... have you even done your homework I asked you to do? Tell you what, since you don't have the balls to get in your prius and actually drive to a gun shop, just call one on the phone. Maybe if they don't have to see how much you sweat around big scary guns, you'll feel more comfortable asking them if you can buy one that is automatic.
I've seen articles that say AK-47 and articles that say "AK-47 style weapon". What I have not seen are pictures of the weapon or anything stating that it was automatic. You would think if it was, the shooter would have fired more than just 15 rounds. I guess if the person writing the article had the vast amount of gun knowledge that you do, anything would look like an AK-47 to them. You're a braindead sheep. Grow up.
No one has a machine gun you retard. Your comments show your ass and you have no clue about guns. Your "machine guns" operate the same way as a semi-automatic pistol. One pull, one round. Do me a favor. Go to your local gun store and ask THEM if you can buy a fully automatic weapon. Make sure you bring you mom with you to console you when they laugh you out of the damn store.
He is arguing over my comment too. Dude is either a complete retard or an undercover libtard faggot.