This article reminds me of the "fire sale" in Live Free or Die Hard - it starts with a traffic jam / crashes triggered by traffic light manipulation, and of course escalates from there. I always felt like the movie was predictive programming for a real-world plan.
Do you think this is how the end starts - a massive hack / shutdown of systems everywhere? We don't need nukes or an EMP when everything we have relies on a vulnerable system of interconnected machines.
I see constant, verifiable bits of evidence that disprove each model, yet I see a constant stream of diatribes from each side… sound familiar? Divide and conquer. It's possible that both models are false, completely.
Nobody can deny the fake footage from the ISS, the absolutely fake moon landing, the fake Tesla Roadster in space, the lasers across 20 mile stretches, the zoom ends on boats that should be completely behind the horizon, etc.
And then on the flipside, nobody can deny things like the celestial poles (a post today), the ability to grab a telescope in view another planet, etc.
It's possible we are in a physical simulation of some kind. I think pretending that we know the answer for sure, one way or another, based on bullshit and lies fed to us by the television is just a LARP.
Thoughts?
We were driving through the ghetto 30 minutes away from home (it's the outskirts of the nearest city). I sometimes drive through there for nostalgia because it feels like the past, since nothing has really changed (versus all the nice expensive areas that have been filled in with brand new corporate chains, etc.).
Anyway, we were driving under an overpass and I noticed somebody on the concrete area to the right, and right as I turned to look over it was this old man in a wheelchair. The look on his face made my heart sink; he just had this look of despair, and I'm talking this guy was set back really far to avoid being seen by traffic, so he wasn't trying to look forlorn to get money or something. Anyway, it made me feel so bad instantly because he reminded me of a long gone uncle of mine, which had the effect of making it feel personal. I just imagined my uncle sitting under there, imagining what his life must have been like, imagining what happened that led to this situation. So I flipped a bitch to go back under the overpass the other way and flip a bitch to go back next to him and stop to give him some money. I don't ever give anybody money, nobody. Whenever I see healthy looking homeless people begging I feel like somebody should put them in a wood chipper, one at a time, and feed the mulch to the others. Anyway, I put on my flashers and pulled over to the curb and tried to wave him over to hand him some cash, but then he was trying to signal to me with his face, which made me realize he couldn't move anything besides his face. So I got out and I walked over to him, left my wife in the passenger seat and told her to lock the door since we were in the ghetto. Don't worry, we both carry, always. I walked over to hand him the money and said something like "here you go man", and he said "no no I don't need any money, I just need help.", And when I asked him to clarify what do you need help with he explained that some metal bars from the wheelchair were stabbing into his side and leg because he was sort of like leaking out under the arms, since he had almost no control over anything below the neck. He had some control, which made me think it was probably diabetes or something, rather than a neck injury. Anyway, I helped him get adjusted and wedged a pillow and bag and stuff into the sides of the wheelchair that helped him stay in place longer (his idea). And he said thank you, I forced him to take the money and he literally wouldn't take it, so I literally just put it on his better hand that he could move a little and told him "this is $40, get some food". He was like "oh my God", and the money just sort of sat there on his hand. I said "have a good night", which I realized immediately was the weirdest thing to say. When we left I called the police to ask if they had somebody who could help him and the officer who called me back told me that they help him often when he gets stuck in his wheelchair all wrong, etc.
Anyway, I'm not writing this to brag "I gave somebody money!" (I make a lot of money and I never give anything to anyone, so I'm not charitable - I'm Scrooge McDuck). The point is that after we left the situation, for the first time ever, I felt like our country was lost. We've got wealthy college students getting $10,000 for free, filthy fucking mongrels and illegal immigrants getting free fucking money every day all over the place, scum pieces of shit in corporate America lobbying for more free money for their customers, and here we have some guy who probably worked his fucking ass off his whole life and then something happened, maybe his wife died, who fucking knows, but this guy is just sitting in a wheelchair under a bridge, waiting to die. I've seen a lot of homeless people, I've seen a lot of helpless people, but something about this guy and his situation and the look on his face when we drove by, the feeling of despair that I had for him, it made me hate what America has become for the first time ever. Fuck this shit about how "America is great and the Democrats are the bad guys", etc. We are all America. We let this fucking shit happen. We did this. A country with great freedoms and 450 million guns allowed a few petty tyrants, with only a few tens of thousands in their corrupt pretorian guard, ruin our country completely, without so much as a whimper from anyone. We all fucking dropped the ball, because we were so convinced that orange man was gonna save us, and now all of your offspring and everybody you know will pay the price dearly, most likely with their lives, in the coming decade. I said "your", because I don't have any kids. I'd like to think it's because I was smart enough to know the direction the world was going in, but the reality is I was always too selfish to give up being a kid to raise kids.
Anyway, I don't mean to make anybody depressed, but I feel like a lot of us are not facing the reality; it doesn't matter who's right or wrong. What matters is who wins, and we are not winning.
This is a warning. Get out of cities or highly populated metro areas immediately and permanently. Get to the country if you can, somewhere where they grow a lot of food on small farms. If you have a remote job, you have no excuse. If you have family nearby, tell them to do the same, but do not stay behind with them. You will die along side them if you do.
Do this before winter at any cost.
The federal government is in the business of guaranteeing mortgages (a vast majority of mortgages), and is, therefore, able to create requirements for those who finance their homes with those mortgages…
Now, imagine you are a federal agency (FEMA) that is highly corrupt and likes to spy on people and plans to potentially round up dissenters before and during a potential civil conflict.
This will cost a ton of money.
Scratch your head... [lightbulb!]
Reach over to your federal mortgage guarantor buddies and tell them to require flood insurance to be paid, to you, by their mortgage holders, whose property falls within a flood zone.
Remember that YOU define flood zones, nation-wide...
Obviously I could be wrong, and if I am then I am being an asshole for posting this, but I feel like over the past couple weeks u/Corporis was switched out for a different employee. The grammar and terminology and types of posts have drastically changed all of the sudden. The MO remains the same (keep people focused on mainstream sources and narratives), but the degree of spice has increased and the person (or AI) behind the user is markedly different.
I started reading his tweets from time to time over the past couple years, and, even though I've heard people call him deep state/controlled op, I haven't really noticed anything particularly neocon about him. He seems like a real conservative, and he constantly calls out false flag related stuff well at least playing it safe with the language he uses, but with his Navy background, who knows whether he is independent or not…
What are your thoughts about him? Are there any telling moments or clues that he left to suggest that he is a controlled op?
Note: exclude his relationship with pillow man in this - that's well enough known to be excluded from this conversation. I'm more concerned with things that might've been easily overlooked, like maybe an old post or something he has said in the past or some job he held or some other relationship that is questionable, etc.
I believe the thinking that I'm laying out here will save some lives at some point.
Background
In particular, people in this community and, in general, suspicious minded people Tend to work with some abstractions and suppositions based upon these abstractions, and among these are things like "the powers that be are evil", etc.
To a large degree these abstractions and suppositions lead to more efficient thinking and intuition. For example, as an analogy, if you know that government agencies do more harm than good, and you are quickly scanning through new stories and come across one titled "CIA thinks we should have Amazon Alexa devices in all of our houses", based on the supposition that the CIA is evil or at least does more harm than good, we can immediately surmise that "We do not want Amazon Alexa devices in our houses at all".
However, the knowledge of the existence of this kind of thinking can easily be used against us, in a manner no less humorous than what was illustrated in the poisoning scene from The Princess Bride (look up that short scene on YouTube, if you've never seen the movie - it's important to know how the scene ends in order to understand the rest of this post).
For example, if the powers that be wants to distract conspiracy theorists from discovering their true motives, which might involve gun confiscation, etc., they can feign a cover-up in the subject of aliens and UFOs, and many a conspiracy theorist will focus all of their attention on trying to prove that aliens and UFOs do, in fact, exist.
When applied to Whitehat theories (like Q), we often deride this kind of thinking as "4-D chess", etc. I believe this derision is the correct reaction, because it's a logical mistake to assume that a group of people smart enough to take over the world is not smart enough to uncover a plot against them that is, otherwise, obvious to us Internet conspiracy theorists.
However, it would also be a mistake to assume that such a powerful group of people would not use this kind of complex "4-D chess" logic against us, unbeknownst to us.
What I propose, as a solution to this risk, is a system of principles that is based on some very high-level suppositions but which does not prescribe automatic (and, thus, predictable) logic, in response to each bit of information we receive.
Theoretical Examples
A good example of such a principal might be "don't trust any bit of information completely", while a bad example would be "every school shooting is a false flag perpetrated by the FBI".
The former example makes us pay attention to the details and look for corroborating information while also looking to uncover clues that might serve too prove the information true or false.
The latter (FBI) example could be true 100% of the time, but if just one part of it is incorrect, then it serves no purpose and could be used against us as a form of character attack. For example, imagine a scenario where a real shooting is actually perpetrated by whatever bad actors are behind the scenes, and they create perfect evidence for this scene by filming the whole thing, but then they make it ostensibly a false flag with all kinds of conflicting and confusing information on CNN, etc., and then after all the conspiracy theorists point out that it's a false flag and publish all kinds of conspiracy documentaries and information, then suddenly the video evidence is released of the shooting and makes us all look like idiots. Another contrive scenario one can imagine is that there is actually a Cabal behind the scenes doing these FF attacks, but it turns out to be a "conservative" group who is doing it to make conservatives afraid that they were going to take guns so that more conservatives will buy guns as quickly as possible. Even if this is not true at all, I'm sure that by the time you finished reading that last sentence you were already thinking "I could see that", so if you could imagine that being the case, then you could also imagine how such a story could be contrived and sold to the sheep over CNN's airwaves.
In the end, what we are left with is a scenario where we have limited real information and gratuitous amounts of false information, potentially from the powers that be and potentially from ourselves. When we stick to principled thinking and limited suppositions based on known facts, we will uncover the true plot more accurately, or we will at least know to what degree we are ignorant of the true plot, instead of ever blindly believing one dogma or another and taking incorrect action based on that dogma.
Personal Example - "COVID Vaccines"
I don't take any vaccines and I definitely would not take any form of medicine that was new in technology (mRNA vaccine) and new in general (COVID "vaccines"). Because I didn't take these "vaccines" and I never will, I might be predisposed to one or more dogmas related to my sentiments about these "vaccines". One such sentiment is that the "vaccines" were created to directly kill a large number of people (e.g., for population control). If I've based what I perceive to be my principles on this supposition, then I am struggling to maintain my principles after most of the people who took the vaccine did not die. If I have based my principles on lower level actual principles, such as "I don't just inject random shit into my veins because Gubment said so", then I could care less about what happens elsewhere in the world. I just do not inject random shit into my veins, period. Another thing that happens when you allow a dogma, like that example, to slip into your thinking, is that you don't consider the unknown unknowns. for example, one thing that I have only seen seldom discussed in conspiracy forums since the beginning of all this is the idea that, perhaps, the vaccines were designed to kill everybody who didn't take the vaccines (allowing the recipients to live with evolved viruses that will spread to the rest of us and kill us while allowing them to live). If my principles are "I don't inject random shit in my veins" then I have to accept that they may be trying to kill me still. It doesn't change whether I want to take the vaccine or not, but it's one more thing to consider. For example, if I'm trying to decide what my preps look like and I am considering a scenario where some form of violent disease will emerge from vaccinated people to kill me, I'm going to prepare for that scenario. If I'm just waiting for all the vaccinated people to drop dead like flies, then I'm not going to prepare for that scenario.
Another problem with this thinking is that we tend to prepare for the scenarios that are most believable and, often, most survivable (e.g., simply don't take the vaccine and wait for everybody who did take it to die), while not considering that, if seriously powerful and evil players were planning this behind the scenes, they would not offer us the most survivable scenario that we could prepare for easily. And this does not even take into account that we do not even know the true motives behind the plan that is unfolding.
The bottom line is that there are unknown unknowns, and for everything that we think we know but we don't actually know for sure, there are many unknown unknowns that we will not prepare for, until it's too late.
Somebody posted on GLP about waking up at 4 AM and was asking others, and a lot of people replied that they did also. I did also and have been many times recently. What about you guys? In the past, waking up before 8 AM was a rare thing, maybe once in a quarter or something.
I think this is being caused by minor space weather. There have been M class flares almost every day for weeks. Normally I see about one of those every week or two on the suspicious observers app. I've had the app for years.
There has been plenty of evidence that folks like Stew Peters and Dr David Martin are Freemasons. These two, among a few others (Peter McCullough, etc.) are the top names we know, in terms of "the vax is poison" messaging.
The reason I'm bringing this up is because either these guys are working for the bad guys or they are part of a "white hat" scam that is equally as bad from somebody else's perspective.
Two options I see:
-
We are the ones being tricked (something I've been preaching was a possibility from the beginning) and when the real "virus" comes the subservient lemmings who took the poison will survive.
-
some weird scenario where these characters were put in place to cheerlead us and keep us confident through all of this chaos, without us eventually capitulating, while the real goal (to get rid of all the sheep) is achieved.
Think about how obvious the first option sounds and how ridiculous the second one does. However, I will say that, in a scenario where the goal is to wipe out most of the rest of the countries in the world, while sparing the strong and creating a "new American century", I could see how something exactly like the second option could be plausible.
Despite my concerns, I'd rather be eaten by gnats for 100 years than take a vaccine ever.
All I know is, despite the "fuck the lemmings", talk, etc., either scenario will be hell on earth with a 30 year long period of chaos, minimum.
I've been trying to book 3 nights at a resort that is ~$900 per night. It's a resort that has many zones/properties in a general area, and I wanted to make sure we were in a specific part of the resort where we have stayed before.
On my third attempt to book, I called and got some Hatian-sounding lady who spoke fluent English but whom seemed very slow to understand anything. I spent almost an hour on the phone trying to get a couple basic questions answered and was put on hold over and over while she was trying to get those answers from some lady in the background who sounded like what, in the past, would have been considered tier 7 support.
I ended up hanging up without booking the hotel and now we aren't going on vacation, because their help is so fucking worthless and retarded that we were not able to even get basic questions answered. I understand that when you get a call center you never gonna get that personal service that you get from the front desk of the hotel, but this was like next level stupid and it made me think "this is the future", and then shortly there after "… the future is now :/".
I can see a time in the near future when the power / water just starts shutting off in various US cities because of the caliber of idiots that are in key positions.
At some point, money becomes worthless. Even if the currency doesn't "collapse", if everything that you save money for becomes worthless trash, served by retarded idiots, it's very easy to imagine how an Atlas Shrugged scenario comes about.
A number of us have at least one stalker user that just follows us around and down votes every post/every message we make, and in my case I think this user is u/Corporis. In my opinion, such behavior is not valid forum behavior and removing such users entirely from the platform would be not censorship, since these users are abusing the platform's voting system with what is, ultimately, a form of spam.
Thoughts?
When SHTF, a lot of folks here may be stocked to the hilt with canned foods, buckets of dried foods, rice, etc. when shit really begins to hit the fan there are a few major reasons why you should steer clear of your stockpile for as long as possible:
# 1
If it gets to the point where do you feel compelled to start consuming your prep, then that means things are likely not gonna be getting better for a very long time, which means that you should be out there in the streets/stores groveling for whatever remaining supplies you can get, and continuing to stockpile excess while reducing your consumption to subsistence levels.
By the time that available supply runs out, everybody who has no prep will perish (this is not a good thing - don't celebrate the demise of others, just because they were too ignorant to prepare). After this period of time passes, there will be a lot fewer remaining people to consume whatever resources remain, which means that you may not have to dip into your stockpile to survive. If things continue downwards from this point (think of a worst case scenario like a nuclear winter), you will still have whatever number of months of supplies that you started with to survive the real SHTF that ensues.
Reason # 1 could be summed up as "shit can always get much worse".
# 2
The next reason is that you may think shit has hit the fan, and so you begin to consume your stockpile, and then suddenly things turn around and start getting better, and now you have consumed your stock pile and you are no longer prepared for whatever comes next, while the likelihood of another SHTF scenario probably increases exponentially after this point in time (due to all the systems that will have failed as a result of the first SHTF).
# 3
If your neighbors and everybody around you have been going to the store/other resource pool, and you have just been comfortably hiding out in your house (to avoid chaos, etc.), then the likelihood of somebody nearby realizing that you are stocked up goes up increases.
The first point stands on its own and should be reason enough to follow this advice.
BONUS
Whatever food preps you have, add 100 pounds of rice AND 1 water filter (life straw or Sawyer Mini) per person to that. It's cheap AF, you can buy cheap mylar bags from Amazon and oxygen absorbers to put in those bags and the race will last for many years. And then you will have about six months extra runway when SHTF.
Here are the mylar bags:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08MDWBMY4/
Here are the oxygen absorbers: