I made this post as a response to a comment thread (here: https://conspiracies.win/p/16a9h3yYIa/x/c/), because I felt like it was long enough to warrant existence as a post.

Picture a chart with the X axis representing age and the Y axis representing wealth. It would be pretty easy to see that, aside from some outliers, the majority of the people (points) placed on this chart would be in a diagonal line from the bottom left to the top right (indicating a high degree of correlation), since young people tend to have less wealth and older people tend to have more wealth. This is easy for a human to see when visualizing a chart. In a computer program, a Euclidean distance calculation is used, which involves essentially drawing a triangle with the hypotenuse ends connecting two data points on the chart. In reality, no triangle is drawn, since this is in a computer program rather than a visual chart on paper, but the left to right and up to down distance, between the points, is used to calculate the length of the hypotenuse, via the Pythagorean theorem. The length of the hypotenuse is the Euclidean distance. The shorter the distance the higher the correlation.

This would be the same is looking at such a chart and figuring out "these old guys are all like within a few centimeters of each other" by putting a measuring tape on the chart, the distance between each of those dots being the Euclidean distance.

That example is based on a two dimensional array of data (those dimensions being age and wealth), but imagine a three dimensional chart, like a transparent cube, and on the third dimension you had something like a 0-100 scalar value representing political leaning (0 for left, naturally, and 100 for right). Now the data points would be floating in three-dimensional space, but the same concept would apply, where you could draw lines between the points and figure out the correlations, such as "old people that have wealth tend to be right leaning, but old people that are poor tend to be left-leaning". Obviously three dimensional data is much more valuable than two dimensional data. You can use two data points to predict the third, with a reasonable degree of accuracy (e.g., "this guy is 60 and very wealthy, so he is probably right leaning").

Think about how much more valuable 12 dimensions would be, compared to three. How about 12,000 dimensions? Unfortunately, three dimensions is about as far as we can go with the human mind, since we can only observationally understand three dimensions.

But, in data science there exists N-dimensional arrays. And, despite not being able to observe one of these arrays in a visual chart, the same kind of math applies.

Take for example, a 5-dimensional array:

• sex
• age
• married status
• favorite color
• is gay (self reported: true or false)

Given a set of millions of people and knowing these 5 attributes of all of them, a similar kind of mathematics can be applied to this data set to come up with a deep understanding of the relationship between these attributes. For example, your program would be able to understand things like "males between 24 and 68, who wear pink, and are not married, are more likely to be gay", or " females between 18 and 36 who wear pink or more likely to be gay than females between 36 and 48 who wear pink", etc.

This is called psychographic analysis, and it's exactly how we are so deeply understood by big tech, and it's the exact knowledge that big tech and the powers that be use against us in every fashion (e.g., trying to make us gay, etc.). The same kind of data science is precisely what Cambridge Analytica used to get Trump elected in 2016. It worked on me, despite me knowing about their use of Cambridge Analytica before the election.

This kind of knowledge gives one a lot of power.

I was just listening to the talk that Peter Zeihan u/GynaNumbaZero posted yesterday or so, and I had this sudden Epiphany. I hadn't really thought about any kind of relationship between the boomer demographic shift and the inflation situation, and then it struck me:

The boomers have a ton of money, so what better time to do this gigantic inflationary generational transfer of wealth then right when they are retiring. On one hand, the boomers are able to get massive amounts of money for their assets, ONE TIME, but on the other hand they just jacked the costs of living up probably 100%, permanently, once the dust settles,

This means that, instead of lobster dinners at an island resort and fancy wine on the beach, boomers will be relegated to bingo/bridge night like the depression generation.

Zap made a couple posts today that got me thinking about 5G again, so I figured I would make a post.

I am extremely worried about the EMF from 5G towers alone (let alone the weakening magnetic field implications that Zap mentioned).

I've got to TriField TF2 and a GQ EMF-390, and while I've seen people on the Internet detail some of the problems with the former's ability to accurately measure low to moderate amounts of EMF, without greatly exaggerating, I can attest to the fact that one can at least use these consumer priced meters to measure relative EMF radiation, barring some gross underestimation of the calculus involved pertaining the length of the antenna and the wave length of the offending radiation.

For example, I can put my TF2 next to a router and take average measurements while moving it around the router at a very close range (1-3 inches) while the router is doing work (playing an HD video on a connected device 50 feet away), and then I can use that measurement as a "you definitely don't wanna be in this much EMF" benchmark, knowing that having that router right next to you would represent levels that are absolutely within the ranges shown, in multiple studies, to have drastic effects on your health, assuming you are in this territory on a long-term basis (for example, putting your head 3 inches in front of your router for an hour is not going to kill you, but doing so for years probably will, one way or another).

Using that router benchmark, I am able to compare that against ambient EMF in residential areas that have a large 5G tower nearby, and I can tell you, for certain, that you do not want to be living within a quarter mile of one of the large multi-array towers. The inverse square law pertaining to three-dimensional dispersion does not apply to these types of towers, and the reason is because they do not disperse equally in three dimensions; they each contain a series of targeted arrays, and each of these arrays targets a cone, so once you get a couple hundred yards away from it you are most likely well within the range of one or more of these cones. The levels of EMF that I've measured, depending on the distance from the tower, have ranged from 1/4 of the level to 3x the level of EMF measured directly next to a router. 1/4 doesn't seem like a lot until you imagine being in that environment for 10 years, and it's only getting worse as they had more towers.

The smaller towers, the ones that don't have visible array on the outside, that look kind of like a solid metal dildo sticking off the top of the telephone pole or light pole, they project equal or greater amounts of EMF than do the multi-array towers, but they appear to project equally in three dimensions, or perhaps in a circle horizontally; Either way, if you've got one of these, but it's 300 feet or further away, you are probably OK.

I would also add my own conjecture that I do believe some of these arrays contain phased array targeting capabilities, but I have no proof of this.

In the past few days I've received probably a dozen privacy policy change notification emails from all the usual suspects, like DoorDash (which I've used once), GoPro, Coinbase, etc., aka BlackRock cabal companies. I don't know what has suddenly changed that's so important that they would all be sent down orders to do these updates, but it's probably not good.

Imagine a scenario where you and 9 others are captured by enemy combatants after a battle. They put all 10 of you in a big bamboo cage.

A guard watches everyone through the bamboo bars, making sure nothing fucky goes on inside. Once a day, the single guard comes in and checks under everyone's bedding for contraband, which takes about 2 minutes in total. The guard is armed and is a 220 lb solid muscle warrior, but if 3 or 4 of the 10 prisoners worked together, they could easily overpower the guard during his contraband check. However, the guard has informed all 10 prisoners that, if anyone ever tries to plot anything, all who know about or participate in such a plot will be hanged to death.

One soldier has an idea; instead of plotting anything, he'll attempt to use facial expressions and gesticulations to convey the need to take action, with the intention of catalyzing the course of action once he has a sense that he has communicated this sentiment to most of the others.

This scenario, I think, describes the psychology that we, the concerned individuals in this society, experience. We are prisoners of an enemy combatant who intends to end our way of life and/or our lives. We're trying to understand the plan and convince one another and others that the plan is real. We don't fully understand what the plan is and we don't know what the solution is, but we like that our numbers are great enough to affect real change. We're all convinced, by the figurative guard, that the moment anyone goes from this observational and communicative mode to an action mode (even at a protest level), that things will not go well. So we continue to figuratively gesticulate solidarity and understanding to one another, while simultaneously trying to decode our captors' plans.

I made this post as a response to this post:

https://conspiracies.win/p/16ZXQiICt4/why-does-ot-matter-if-people-wak/

I was watching that Ireland "refugee" video that somebody posted :/

Europe was such an amazing place just a few years ago. Visiting France, Austria, Germany, Denmark, and Italy, especially Italy, Western Austria, and southern France, these places have some amazing history, with castles and even ordinary houses dating back almost a thousand years. The landscapes are unbelievably beautiful. It made me so sad to be reminded of what is happening in these places.

Be prepared, because these people aren't being shipped all over the world for no reason. It's coming. You can't will it away. Extremely rich people do not pay to ship military age Africans and muslims all over the world because they have feelings. The global civil war is coming, and when it does, everyone you know who isn't prepared well is going to die. There will be thousands of millions dead before it's over.

Buy land, if you can. Buy guns & ammo, if you can. Buy storable food. Buy water and filtration capacity for a year per person. Buy survival gear. Buy first aid. If you live in a cold area, buy warm gear (the heat will not come on again). Nobody is coming to help you when the time comes.

We sold our house 6 weeks ago or so ago (significant cash out) and moved across the country, and we decided to rent for a bit and gamble that the market would collapse more. But we hate renting and we are already capitulating and putting an offer on a house we found and love. Even with our cash the mortgage will be about the same as before, due to the interest rates. So now we will be gambling that the interest rates will not continue up for long, and that they will decrease below their current level within a couple years. It feels wrong from an investment perspective, but it feels right from a life decision perspective, and it feels right from a security perspective (owning a place we can secure, and where we can grow a garden, etc.), and in the event of a currency crisis it would be bad to be super long cash. Side note: we don't have kids or pets, so it's just my wife and me; and we both have family nearby.

What would you do? And why?

He hasn't posted since May 17th. Anyone know what happened?

https://www.iceagefarmer.com/

I know FE is not a popular topic around here, but I'm looking for something that I think was posted here. There was this flat earth map with global sea currents (like the Gulf Stream, etc.) overlaid. Does this ring a bell? Does anyone have a link to this, or to a video showing it?

I saw a post[1] and it reminded me of something I've thought about a few times. Imagine the ordinary flu vaccine, aside from the known problems it causes, is the ultimate cause of death in most people who take annual flu vaccines, and that most of those people would otherwise live to 90+ years old.

There have been so many interviews with 90+ year old people where, when asked how they lived to be so old and still healthy, etc., and the self-reported reason is always some naturopathic sounding trope, like "I drank water and got lots of sunshine", etc. Never once have I ever heard some 90+ year old say "the high tech medical industry helped me..." or "I took every vaccine", or any horseshit like that.

Imagine the flu vaccine was a lottery of random time bombs with random-length fuses, as a means of population control. Imagine the COVID poison is just the ramp-up period.

Side note: my grandpa lived to be 94 - no vaccines and very little medical care, smoked for 40+ years until he had a minor heart attack in his 60s and the doctor told him "if you don't quit smoking, you'll be dead in less than a year"; prob just a fear tactic to get him to quit. He did quit, that day. In his early 70s he became one of those people that drank red wine "because it's good for their heart". He drank red wine every single day. The point of this is: what if cigarettes didn't almost kill him and red wine didn't save him; what if he simply lived a natural lifespan because he didn't "science" his blood with various injectables.

1. https://conspiracies.win/p/15Jn6djvsp/has-anyone-here-heard-of-an-unva/

Disclaimers

I am not a financial advisor and none of this is financial advice or advice of any kind. I'm stating all of this only for informational / educational purposes.

I don't know everything, and a lot of this is theory, because God knows what the Fed and/or banks will actually do in a situation.

tl;dr if you've got money in savings, you may want to take serious note of whether or not your savings account is a "money market savings account". And, you may want to take note of whether or not you have the facilities to withdraw and securely store your entire balance (or perhaps gold or something else). The bank may be withdrawing all of your money, for themselves, very soon.

Background

Whenever the government passes new laws you can rest assured that those laws will be very important in the years to come. Nearly a decade ago (I don't recall the exact year, but I think it was 2013), a bill was passed that allowed money market accounts to be frozen by the holding bank, if the bank, using their own discretion, determined they were nearing a "liquidity crisis".

Banking is Fucked

The banking system is far more complex than you might imagine, even given how many documentaries you may have watched on the topic (e.g., starting all the way back at Zeitgeist Addendum, etc.), even if you've fully read Modern Money Mechanics. It is so complex, and the relationships between various entity types and how their regulations affect the availability of funds to other entity types, etc., it would blow your mind.

Current Situation

Because banks are disincentivized (by regulation) to keep M1 money on their books (watch the latest Steven Van Metre video for a quick understanding of that), they sneak everybody into money market accounts. You walk into a bank and say "I need a savings account" and you automatically assume "OK this is actual money that I'm depositing in the bank and it is FDIC insured, etc.". Neither of those statements are true. Money market accounts are SIPC insured in most cases, but that's beside the point. The bank does not keep your M1 money on their books. The money you put in the money market account, which you didn't ask for, flows upward toward the federal reserve, into a special kind of reserve currency status. It is no longer M1 money on the bank's books.

Because of this, as Steven also briefly alludes to, banks outside of the US will begin issuing more loans than they can afford to, because of the market gap (for dollars) created by US regulations. When this happens we are going to see a dollar shortage beyond imagination, and this is going to create a liquidity crisis at the bank of your choosing. When that happens they are going to freeze your money market savings accounts first. They can't simply freeze your FDIC insured ordinary savings account based on their own discretion. I'm not saying that those accounts won't also be frozen. I have no idea. But I do know is that there is a very well defined process for FDIC insurance in the event of a bank becoming insolvent in M1 money.

Crisis

The real crisis will come when there is a "sudden realization" That the total amount of money in both forms of depository accounts does not match the amount of money required to meet regulatory standards.

The solution to this predictable crisis might be for the federal reserve to come in and take over operation of all the banks that fail, and during this process there might be a bail-in. A bail-in is when the banks take money from your account (permanently - like "steal it") to meet whatever requirements the Fed gives them.

If this happens, there will be a lot less outcry than you think, and nobody is going to reverse that when it happens. All of the BLM clowns and commie trannies with purple hair don't work and have no savings, so they won't burn anything down. They'll celebrate. The super rich already have their money protected in diversified ways. Middle-class folks with $10-100k will be hit the hardest.

Again, this is all hypothetical, and I may be completely wrong about all of this. Do you own research.

But be ready.

This prediction is based purely on market analysis. We will see a major escalation, in terms of geo politics/war, within the next 10 days. I don't know if this will be Russia/Ukraine, Israel, etc., but it will be big enough to top the headlines similarly to invasion in February.