Yes, that’s the picture you linked earlier. But she’s incorrectly labeled in the photo on the right if that’s supposed to be Denise. Is there a better source of the picture than Twitpic/MS Paint? You’re telling me the picture is one thing when the picture says it’s another.
I did do some further digging though, and the daughter has made several public appearances, as recently as last year. Is she perpetuating a lie as well? If Denise doesn’t exist/never existed, how do you explain her daughter?
Dunno. That image looks like it could be from anything. What is “twitpic”? Who identified the people in the photo and drew the graphics (seemingly in MS Paint)? Is the information on that photo correct?
According to the graphics, Denise isn’t in this photo.
Sure! So the guy in the last article I sent was Kevin Andrews, who was headmaster while Denise worked there. Here is an announcement on their website about his tenure there:
https://www.thenhcs.org/nhcs-founding-headmaster-kevin-andrews-to-retire/
Now it appears he works for the Barr foundation:
https://www.barrfoundation.org/bios/kevin-andrews
Further searches bring up videos, testimonials about his time as a headmaster, and other coworkers (including successors).
For me, him lying about the existence of someone (on the record) should be a huge red flag for anyone he works with and works for in the future. It wouldn’t make sense that his peers would be okay with him doing that.
If there is something else you’re looking for, I’m sure I can dig it up!
Yes, of course!
For a while I believed Obama to be one of the best presidents of our time. After looking more closely at his administration and actions I realize he was far from great.My mind is certainly open to ideas that don't match my current worldview, if evidence is presented.
But I really rather would talk about the school where Denise Richard worked. If the reality is that she didn't exist, why would so many of the staff speak about her as if she did exist? Your evidence seems centered around a picture that you believe to be photoshopped (it looks legit to me), along with speculation that she didn't exist. If I were to accept this to be the true reality, then I have questions about things that don't make sense, such as, again, her peers discussing her as if she does exist.
Well, you're presenting a reality, and I'm only questioning it. What's wrong with asking questions? Why are you dodging answering a very simple question?
I don't really see what was photoshopped in this picture. Maybe I'm missing something here.
But again, there are articles of real people talking about the family. Have they been spoken to? Are they also lying about a family's existence?
I'm not sure if that answers my question. Have people spoken to the other employees of Neighborhood House Charter School? Because surely if there was never a Denise Richard, they'd be able to confirm that no such employee existed, yes?
Also, the site has been updated several times since the bombing. The news/events page has several semi-annual lessons posted, and there are articles pertaining to remote learning and COVID.
Here's an article where another NHCS employee is speaking highly of Denise. Is the suggestion that he's also in on the coverup?
https://www.msnbc.com/the-last-word/visit-8-year-old-martin-richards-school-msna56791
Does that include other employees at the school where Denise worked? Did they confirm that she never actually worked there?
So is the claim that Denise Richard, who's still alive, never existed, and it's an actress pretending to be her? I want to make sure I have that part clear.
Not really. Because that's what movies are.
Certainly peculiar! If there's more information that links the two that would be ideal. But to me this looks like the same graffiti writing I see all over my city. If they were hiring vandalizers, why use the same person on two different cities? Wouldn't they take more care to just get someone else to do it?
It looks darkened on the far left side of it. I don't think it was intentional. The left side of the oval made by the spraypaint is pretty light too.
Eh I’m not sold. The photo quality isn’t perfect, but when you zoom in there appears to be some black paint on the brick. If you look on the opposite side of the shape you can see that the paint isn’t that strongly applied either.
What do you think?
We’d have to see evidence of that happening for it to be a well known fact.
And again, these would have to be paid to the family, friends, coworkers, neighbors...that’s a huge web of people that you’d have to rely on to stay silent.
But the other thing is based on the constitution even if pence denies a states electoral votes, the house and senate have to agree with him, otherwise the votes go forward as it is currently certified.
You think that’s a reasonable assumption then? I can tell when you’ve read them because you do your little downvote thing.
So these dozens of people have all been paid off? That’s your assumption?
Well yes but then for that to be true, then we must assume that this is a large community of her peers, neighbors, and coworkers who have all decided that covering up her death and pretending she’s alive is the right thing to do.
You’d have to base the execution of this scenario on the complete compliance of an entire network of people. How is that sort of thing feasible?
Well, because if she wasn’t surely alive, there would logically have to be some record of her being dead.
There would have to be some recognition of her death by coworkers, friends, and or family. To believe otherwise would be to assume that there is some greater group out there who is either threatening or paying off dozens or potentially hundreds of people who would have to not only ignore a peer’s death, but also continue to lie and make a country believe that a person is still alive who in fact died as a result of this complication.
Moreover, there are photographs of her, although she is wearing a mask. One could propose that this is a body double, but now you have photographic evidence of a group of people continuing to perpetuate a complete fabrication of a woman’s life who made national headlines. It would be a conspiracy to include the government, the healthcare system, her boss, her coworkers, her family, her friends, and her children, and requiring ALL of them to continue the charade.
It would require, still, that each person consciously is aware of, what I would agree to be, a morally repugnant task and not admit to a soul this lie that’s taking place. The very concept of which should be repulsive to anyone, to suggest a nationally televised death/whateveryouwanttocallit from a vaccine be covered up and the person faked as we move forward.
It would require the body double to live a second life? For how long? Do they give up their previous identity? Does she also act as the mother to the children?
All of this is just a foundation on why I choose to accept that reality is as it’s currently presented, and she’s at work right now.
At this moment? No idea.
Reports say she’s been doing shifts at work since the incident (as in, days after the effect). None of her coworkers or her family or friends seem to dispute this. So I don’t really see why there is any reason to believe the contrary.
In short, probably at work or at her house. That’s my best guess.
I don’t know. Is it?