Do you think this is some sort of gotcha? You're changing the subject to something that I was never talking about in the first place. I'm not an authority on the Star of David, I'm not going to attempt to win the approval of some internet antisemite with scholarly citations because you people don't give a shit about these things in the first place. I could lay some whole trip on you about Jewish mysticism, about the shield of David, etc. but it wouldn't matter. It's all the same old bad faith shit. I could tell you that, obviously, the Star of David does not have Satanic origins.
But I also don't remotely buy into the notion that the Bible prophesied contemporary events, so your entire angle here is moot. It doesn't work on me. I can't imagine having a more reductive and superstitious perspective on reality, but that goes hand in hand with the mind of the midwit.
Well, we’re obviously not remotely in agreement. You’re trying to appropriate the language of a religious text written thousands of years ago in an attempt contextualize your oppression fantasy of what you imagine is happening today. Kudos for framing it as a Democrat thing, which makes you a partisan hack on top of a racist midwit.
Yes, just as the New Testament proposes that everyone who doesn't accept Christ will languish in Hell forever. Is this the best you can do? What happened to raping 3-year olds and murdering goyim for inquiring about the Torah and all that shit?
Truly scraping the bottom of the barrel now that all of your fake Talmud quotations have been debunked. The passage in question refers to "all other Gods," not merely Christianity. But gee, I can't believe the language employed in the Old Testament is of a passionate fervor.
Anything else?
Thanks for the laugh. I can't believe people living in fields before the advent of indoor plumbing would have primitive ideas about cleanliness and bathroom etiquette.
Is this the logic, whimpering endpoint of the Talmud conversation when the rest of you have been repeatedly BTFO'd with your fabricated passages about goyim being "cattle" and all the rest of that shit?
If you've done "research for decades" then how come so much of your information is blatantly false, easily debunked and completely misunderstands and misinterprets fundamental aspects of Judaism, Torah and Talmud?
Are you simply an antisemites acting in bad faith? Or are you just stupid?
It's being downvoted because all of these so-called "quotes" are either completely falsified or taken so far out of context that they no longer resemble the initial message. No one is fleeing from anything, all are welcome to do some actual investigation into these matters to see the truth.
Knock yourself out, racist: https://www.sefaria.org/
Making these false delineations makes you seem even more delusional. The Talmud is the dissection, discussion and analysis of the Torah. I'm sure your "best friend" appreciates the relentless antisemitic posts you make online.
Blatantly false, right off the bat. "Yashu" is not derogatory at all. It is the Aramaic spelling of "Yeshua" or "Joshua." It is very simply a man's name. There is nothing derogatory about it. Associating Jesus with the name Yashu is problematic from the start, as the latter was a common name.
Yashu (Jesus) was sexually immoral and worshipped a brick.” (Sanhedrin 107b): False. This is a distortion of the truth by Van Hyning based upon a legendary story in this portion of the Talmud. As it is actually related, Jesus and his teacher met a woman at a wayside inn; Jesus admired her extreme beauty. For this the teacher severely admonished him and dismissed him as a pupil. The rabbis in the Talmud sharply criticized the teacher for his harshness and severity towards Jesus.
"Yashu (Jesus) was cut off from the Jewish people for his wickedness and refused to repent.” (Sotah 47a)** Sotah 47a simply doesn't state this at all. It concerns a disagreement between Jesus and a rabbinical mentor, but this isn't the message it conveys.
“Miriam the hairdresser had sex with many men.” (Shabbath 104b, Hebrew Edition only)
“She who was the descendant of princes and governors (the virgin Mary) played the harlot with carpenters.” (Sanhedrin 106a): It does not make an evaluation of anyone, but rather reports a dialogue; "It was taught, Rabbi Eliezer said to the Sages: But did not Ben Stada bring forth witchcraft from Egypt by means of scratches (in the form of charms) upon his flesh? He was a fool, answered they, and proof cannot be adduced from fools." The professional antisemites are relying on the theory that the Talmudic scholars meant Jesus when they referred to Ben Stada. A British scholar, R. Travers Herford, gives it as his opinion in "Christianity in Talmud and Midrash" (p. 37) that Ben Stada means Jesus of Nazareth. Further on, however, he says "...The Talmud has preserved only a very vague and confused recollection of Jesus" (p. 83). And he points out that some people argue "that there are in the Talmud two persons called Jesus, neither of whom is the historical Jesus of Nazareth" (p. 347).
“Christians who reject the Talmud will go to hell and be punished there for all generations.” Lastly, this is a reductive interpretation of how "judgement day" is explained in the Talmud. The text states that there are three ways that people will be judged on this day. Those that lived a virtuous life will ascend, those that sinned wickedly will be sent to Gehenna (which is not Hell, but purgatory) for "generations" and those in the middle will be sent to Gehenna for a year. The line that you're incorrectly quoting actually goes like this:
"But the heretics; and the informers; and the apostates [apikorsim]; and those who denied the Torah; and those who denied the resurrection of the dead; and those who separated from the ways of the Jewish community and refused to share the suffering; and those who cast their fear over the land of the living; and those who sinned and caused the masses to sin, for example, Jeroboam, son of Nebat, and his company; all of these people descend to Gehenna and are judged there for generations and generations..."
Which is, you know, nearly identical to the orientation of judgement day according to the Christians you seem to be so found of.
Shall I go on?
Nonstop research of absolute bullshit. I’m very glad you posted these so I debunk all of it. I know you won’t care or believe it because the foundation of your entire reality has to revolve around your Jew-hatred, but I’m going to do it anyway.
Also, the massive LOL of this entire song and dance is that “six-sided” is never even mentioned in Acts 7:43. That’s pure poetic license that you and the other antisemites felt at liberty to employ. What a joke.