https://archive.org/stream/photographichist02mill#page/n9/mode/1up

-I don't see anything obvious that determines that this is indeed 1863. -Nothing seems much different from 1863 photos to 1900 photos (not from the book, but my own research.) -The book starts out with a lot of pictures of men, not even in uniform, fixing bridges, railroad bridges, building pontoons to cross rivers, tents, ect. -There are no photos of actual battles. -There are some photos of troops, only Union troops, never what could amount to thousands of troops. -There are cannons but not many pictures with them. -There are dead bodies, many pictures of dead men, most with out any guns, but there are a few where they have their guns. -Pictures of dead animals, some are mysterious, most are dead horses. -There are a lot of barren landscapes and some ruins. There are also a lot of intact towns. The pictures of the towns, houses and civilians are interesting in their own right. What was going on? -There are pictures of the American Flag, but NO pictures of the Confederate Flag. -There is only 1 picture of Confederate troops, very dark shadowy figures, no facial distinction at all, where as all the photos of the Union troops are very clear.

There's a few sites I've come across in Antarctica. Dome C particularly interesting, Dome C if you look at just the aeriel photos it looks kind of bizzare lots of red snow and etc. May be just rust or something, but another interesting thing if you look at the user uploaded photos there's a picture taken by Georgia Di Bernardo (his background is also questionable he's a science writer, pictures of him in Zero G plane etc, also his review history is somewhat interesting), so in the picture of the sun in Antarctica he takes it looks like stars in the same frame with the sun, hoping for opinions on that photo.

Also interesting is Dome A, or Dome Argus, and Dome F, or The Valkyrie Dome. The names Valkyrie (meaning of hell) and Argus (meaning 100 eyed monster, the watcher) dome locations.

Thoughts?

⚡You get them to do something not once, but again and again, increasing the level of intensity each time. Usually you do this 3 times (note: we’ve have 3 lockdowns). This increases compliance - you're much more likely to get them to do whatever you want ⚡A 'Yes' set: Get them to say 'Yes' to something small at first (2 weeks to "flatten the curve") then gradually increase (months of lockdown, Christmas cancelled, socially/economically coerced into vaccines). In this way they're much more likely to keep saying yes ⚡Confusion: Keep them in a constant state of uncertainty. The conscious mind responds by 'going offline' as it searches for the appropriate response for something it has no precedent for. Then it's much easier for the manipulator to gain access to the unconscious mind and change belief systems. For example, lockdown rules are changing on practically a day-to-day basis; we're living in a world we've never lived in before, everyone's stumbling about with no idea how to behave. We've no energy left to fight our oppressors. ⚡Repetition: Repeat the same information over and over (see any newspaper / TV news for evidence of this!) Illusion of Choice- Make them believe they're in control by giving them 2 choices, both of which lead to the same result. For example, 'Do you want the Pfeizer or the Oxford?' or 'You can choose to be good or bad. Bad = more lockdown. Good = more lockdown.' ⚡"Social Proof"- Images and videos of film and TV stars, musicians and sportsmen and women receiving their jab. “Look, all these great celebrities are backing it!" Scarcity": “You'll have to wait your turn for the vaccine... we might be running out!", to create a surge in people booking in for their jab, thus increasing uptake