Paul begins appearing in the dreams of random people, many of whom do not know him. In the dreams, calamity occurs or the dreamers ask for help, but Paul is passive or emotionless and does not intervene.

a) Those who don't know (perceive) experience calamity (reason) within dreams (suggested).

b) To be implies passive (life) within active (inception towards death), hence a passage. Others suggest passivism to tempt one to ignore re-acting.

c) Emotion (Latin emoveo) - "to move from" tempts one to ignore being resistance (temporary growth) within velocity (ongoing loss), hence emotions tempting one to ignore ones position.

In short...one needs to resist wanted temptation aka choosing motion (needed) or emotion (wanted).

d) Consenting to suggested tempts one to ask for more suggestions, hence the dreamers seeking answers from those awake.

e) Questions (suggested progressivism aka quest towards outcome) tempt others to suggest answers, while in return ignoring perceivable solution offered.

That's why answering questions by dreamers is tempting those awake into the dream-state of ignoring perceivable for suggested.

f) Ignorance of dreamer breeds insolence within those awake. Why? Because a wake requires resisting the temptation of falling asleep, while ignorance lures one into it...unbeknownst to those ignoring.

This is where those awake find themselves tempted to scream "wake the fuck up" to those willingly asleep.

g) Trying to wake up those willingly asleep will be viewed by those who WANT to sleep as NOT WANTing to wake up, hence a conflict of reason (want vs not want) with those awake at the opposite side aka something that needs to be attacked to defend ones status quo...which is ignorance and which will not be admitted without fighting self.

h) Paul falling for the dream (wishes the dream was reality) implies Saul aka inversion of apostle (to send away) by bringing those awake and those asleep together.

Paul starts apart from, yet within, others, then gets pushed outside by others, while wanting to be inside with others.

In reality...PAUL (apostle; to send away) and SAUL (sole/soul; one and only) implies each one (life) send away (inception towards death), hence apart from one another, not together. That's why a dreamer can only awake self.

I want to know

Wanting suggested contradicts/inverts/ignores/denies perceivable need...KNOW; verb (to perceive).

consider

a) CON (together; with) contradicts SIDE (apart from)...

b) Implication (if/then) keeps sides apart from one another. Reason (want vs not want; true vs false; yes vs no; belief vs disbelief etc.) tempts sides together within a conflict of reason.

Paul begins appearing in the dreams of random people, many of whom do not know him. In the dreams, calamity occurs or the dreamers ask for help, but Paul is passive or emotionless and does not intervene.

a) Those who don't know (perceive) experience calamity (reason) within dreams (suggested).

b) To be implies passive (life) within active (inception towards death), hence a passage. Others suggest passivism to tempt one to ignore re-acting.

c) Emotion (Latin emoveo) - "to move from" tempt one to ignore being resistance (temporary growth) within velocity (ongoing loss), hence emotions tempting one to ignore ones position.

In short...one needs to resist wanted temptation aka motion (needed) or emotion (wanted).

d) Consenting to suggested tempts one to ask for more suggestions, hence the dreamers seeking answers from those awake.

e) Questions (suggested progressivism aka quest towards outcome) tempt others to suggest answers, while in return ignoring perceivable solution offered.

That's what answering questions by dreamers is tempting those awake into the dream-state of ignoring perceivable for suggested.

f) Ignorance of dreamer breeds insolence within those awake. Why? Because a wake requires resisting the temptation of falling asleep, while ignorance lures onto into it...unbeknownst to those ignoring.

This is where those awake find themselves tempted to scream "wake the fuck up" to those willingly asleep.

g) Trying to wake up those willingly asleep will be viewed by those who WANT to sleep as NOT WANTing to wake up, hence a conflict of reason (want vs not want) with those awake at the opposite side aka something that needs to be attacked to defend ones status quo...which is ignorance and which will not be admitted without fighting self.

h) Paul falling for the dream (wishes the dream was reality) implies Saul aka inversion of apostle (to send away) by bringing those awake and those asleep together.

Paul starts apart from, yet within, others, then gets pushed outside by others, while wanting to be inside with others.

In reality...PAUL (apostle; to send away) and SAUL (sole/soul; one and only) implies each one (life) send away (inception towards death), hence apart from one another, not together. That's why a dreamer can only awake self.

I want to know

Wanting suggested contradicts/inverts/ignores/denies perceivable need...KNOW; verb (to perceive).

consider

a) CON (together; with) contradicts SIDE (apart from)...

b) Implication (if/then) keeps sides apart from one another. Reason (want vs not want; true vs false; yes vs no; belief vs disbelief etc.) tempts sides together within a conflict of reason.