I am saying that if i do have to take that stance then i definitely can't be sure my mom isn't a doppleganger. Nobody can truly know.

The sort of docs that mostly are false are those aligned with narratives, not those that are unpleasant to it. Stochastic thinking.

Also, what sort of 'source' would you expect me to communicate through html? there are only docs to be had. What kind of thing i could include in an answer for you to verify would satisfy your terms exactly?

What could be done was to debate the sources, in the specific instance. But if you make an argument for docs being 'fakeable' (true, but then again all is a 'doc' these days) that's kind of lame, as it is the only content we can have.

If you prefer better words for it, instead of 'know', put 'history attests'

I am saying that if i do have to take that stance then i definitely can't be sure my mom isn't a doppleganger. Nobody can truly know.

The sort of docs that mostly are false are those aligned with narratives, not those that are unpleasant to it. Stochastic thinking.

Also, what sort of 'source' would you expect me to communicate through html? there are only docs to be had. What kind of thing i could include in an answer for you to verify would satisfy your terms exactly?

What could be done was to debate the sources, in the specific instance. But if you make an argument for docs being 'fakeable' (true, but then again all is a 'doc' these days) that's kind of lame, as it is the only content we can have.

I am saying that if i do have to take that stance then i definitely can't be sure my mom isn't a doppleganger. Nobody can truly know.

The sort of docs that mostly are false are those aligned with narratives, not those that are unpleasant to it. Stochastic thinking.

Also, what sort of 'source' would you expect me to communicate through html? there are only docs to be had. What kind of thing i could include in an answer for you to verify would satisfy your terms exactly?

What could be done was to debate the sources, in the specific instance. But if you make an argument for docs being 'fakeable' that's kind of lame, as it is the only content we can have.

I am saying that if i do have to take that stance then i definitely can't be sure my mom isn't a doppleganger. Nobody can truly know.

The sort of docs that mostly are false are those aligned with narratives, not those that are unpleasant to it. Stochastic thinking.

Also, what sort of 'source' would you expect me to communicate through html? there are only docs to be had. What kind of thing i could include in an answer for you to verify would satisfy your terms exactly?

I am saying that if i do have to take that stance then i definitely can't be sure my mom isn't a doppleganger. Nobody can truly know.

The sort of docs that mostly are false are those aligned with narratives, not those that are unpleasant to it. Stochastic thinking.

Also, what sort of 'source' would you expect me to communicate through html? there are only docs to be had.

I am saying that if i do have to take that stance then i definitely can't be sure my mom isn't a doppleganger. Nobody can truly know.

The sort of docs that mostly are false are those aligned with narratives, not those that are unpleasant to it. Stochastic thinking

I am saying that if i do have to take that stance then i definitely can't be sure my mom isn't a doppleganger. Nobody can truly know.

The sort of docs that mostly are false are those aligned with narratives, not those that are unpleasant to it.