Understanding Jewish Supremacy
If a gentile chooses to stand under (understand) a jewish suggestion, then a jew was chosen to be supreme.
To understand the current...
...implies ignoring to resist (life) current (inception towards death).
need to understand
One needs to resist the wanted temptation to stand under another...otherwise one cannot sustain self.
debate
Aka reasoning over suggested information; while ignoring the implication of perceivable inspiration.
jews get to define antisemitism
Gentiles consenting to suggested -isms permits a jew to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested at will.
definition changes overtime
a) A jew suggests definition and time to tempt gentiles to ignore being solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death) aka constantly changing. Holding onto suggested definitions; while contemplating affixed states (past; present; future) tempts one to ignore being moved.
b) A jew suggests words to tempt gentiles to ignore perceivable sound, hence suggested "definition" tempting one to ignore perceivable "DEAF PHONETICIAN" aka being deaf to perceivable phonics (sound).
Another example: suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore perceivable....being in sanus (within sound) and per sonos (by sound).
Suggesting words (information) over sound (inspiration) implies spell-craft.
they are in the sole position to define
a) Sole (all perceivable) generates positions (ones perception) by separating itself from whole into partial.
b) Whole/sole/soul aka "one for all and all for one" aka "there can be only one" aka "alone - ALL(in)ONE"
c) Consenting to suggested definition implies ONES CHOICE establishing CHOSEN ONES position over self by submitting of self to another.
d) Suggested pluralism (they) tempts perceiving singular (one) to ignore self for others.
There is no rational or objective definition that lies outside jewish control
a) Rational implies reasoning over suggested definitions. A jew suggests to tempt gentiles to reason against one another over suggested; which permits a jew control over both sides of every conflict of reason.
Nature operates on implication (if/then)...not on reason (want vs not want; true vs false; yes vs no; agree vs disagree; believe vs denial; good vs bad etc.)
Being implies choice within balance, hence if balance; then choice...reasoning against other choices implies imbalance.
b) Objective implies as perceived by self; consenting to anything suggested by another tempts one to subject self.
c) Being (life) implies in (inception) and out (death) of sides (inception/death balance aka momentum of motion for matter within).
d) jews suggest sides to tempt gentiles off-center and into circumference, which permits jews to erect self at center, while cutting off circumference. This implies circumcision.
Being implies center (perception) within circumference (perceivable)...
Understanding Jewish Supremacy
If a gentile chooses to stand under (understand) a jewish suggestion, then a jew was chosen to be supreme.
To understand the current...
...implies ignoring to resist (life) current (inception towards death).
need to understand
One needs to resist the wanted temptation to stand under another...otherwise one cannot sustain self.
debate
Aka reasoning over suggested information; while ignoring the implication of perceivable inspiration.
jews get to define antisemitism
Gentiles consenting to suggested -isms permits a jew to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested at will.
definition changes overtime
a) jews suggest definition and time to tempt gentiles to ignore being solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death) aka constantly changing. Holding onto suggested definitions; while contemplating affixed states (past; present; future) tempts one to ignore being moved.
b) jews suggest words to tempt gentiles to ignore perceivable sound, hence suggested "definition" tempting one to ignore perceivable "DEAF PHONETICIAN" aka being deaf to perceivable phonics (sound).
Another example: suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore perceivable....being in sanus (within sound) and per sonos (by sound).
Suggesting words (information) over sound (inspiration) implies spell-craft.
they are in the sole position to define
a) Sole (all perceivable) generates positions (ones perception) by separating itself from whole into partial.
b) Whole/sole/soul aka "one for all and all for one" aka "there can be only one" aka "alone - ALL(in)ONE"
c) Consenting to suggested definition implies ONES CHOICE establishing CHOSEN ONES position over self by submitting of self to another.
d) Suggested pluralism (they) tempts perceiving singular (one) to ignore self for others.
There is no rational or objective definition that lies outside Jewish control
a) rational implies reasoning over suggested definitions. A jew suggests to tempt gentiles to reason against one another over suggested; which permits a jew control over both sides of every conflict of reason.
Nature operates on implication (if/then)...not on reason (want vs not want; true vs false; yes vs no; agree vs disagree; believe vs denial; good vs bad etc.).
Being implies choice within balance, hence if balance; then choice...reasoning against other choices implies imbalance.
b) Objective implies as perceived by self; consenting to anything suggested by another tempts one to subject self.
c) Being (life) implies in (inception) and out (death) of sides (inception/death balance aka momentum of motion for matter within).
d) jews suggest sides to tempt gentiles off-center and into circumference, which permits jews to erect self at center, while cutting off circumference. This implies circumcision.
Being implies center (perception) within circumference (perceivable)...