While I agree that the photos are difficult to parse, we know there is no sea level rise and no one knows much about “global” temperature rise. We have very limited climatological data, especially if you consider the earth to be millions or billions of years old. Microclimates are all over the place and can very easily keep ice persistent in arctic regions as needed, while other microclimates increase regional temperatures. Our atmosphere self-regulates and is always trying to move towards equilibrium. I’d encourage you to read some college-level earth science books from pre-1990s.
Your first article/link could easily be explained by the Great Flood. We can assume the global oceanscape drastically changed after such an event. A 12,000 year old city is mostly in line with the young earth theory.
Your second article/link (cosmos) is written by someone who identifies her pronouns and writes articles on paleontology, Hollywood dinosaurs and other fake shit. So that example won’t fly because it’s science fiction, not science.
While I agree that the photos are difficult to parse, we know there is no sea level rise and no one knows much about “global” temperature rise. We have very limited climatological data, especially if you consider the earth to be millions or billions of years old. Microclimates are all over the place and can very easily keep ice persistent in arctic regions as needed, while other microclimates increase regional temperatures. Our atmosphere self-regulates and is always trying to move towards equilibrium. I’d encourage you to read some college-level earth science books from pre-1990s.
Your first article/link could easily be explained by the Great Flood. We can assume the global oceanscape drastically changed after such an event. A 12,000 year old city is mostly in line with the young earth theory.
Your second article/link is written by someone who identifies her pronouns and writes articles on paleontology, Hollywood dinosaurs and other fake shit. So that example won’t fly because it’s science fiction, not science.
While I agree that the photos are difficult to parse, we know there is no sea level rise and no one knows much about “global” temperature rise. We have very limited climatological data, especially if you consider the earth to be millions or billions of years old. Microclimates are all over the place and can very easily keep ice persistent in arctic regions as needed. Our atmosphere self-regulates and is always trying to move towards equilibrium. I’d encourage you to read some college-level earth science books from pre-1990s.
Your first article/link could easily be explained by the Great Flood. We can assume the global oceanscape drastically changed after such an event. A 12,000 year old city is mostly in line with the young earth theory.
Your second article/link is written by someone who identifies her pronouns and writes articles on paleontology, Hollywood dinosaurs and other fake shit. So that example won’t fly because it’s science fiction, not science.
While I agree that the photos are difficult to parse, we know there is no sea level rise and no one knows much about “global” temperature rise. We have very limited climatological data, especially if you consider the earth to be millions of billions of years old (it isn’t). Microclimates are all over the place and can very easily keep ice persistent in arctic regions as needed. Our atmosphere self-regulates and is always trying to move towards equilibrium. I’d encourage you to read some college-level earth science books from pre-1990s.
Your first article/link could easily be explained by the Great Flood. We can assume the global oceanscape drastically changed after such an event. A 12,000 year old city is mostly in line with the young earth theory.
Your second article/link is written by someone who identifies her pronouns and writes articles on paleontology, Hollywood dinosaurs and other fake shit. So that example won’t fly because it’s science fiction, not science.
While I agree that the photos are difficult to parse, we know there is no sea level rise and no one knows much about “global” temperature rise. Microclimates are all over the place and can very easily keep ice persistent in arctic regions as needed. Our atmosphere self-regulates and is always trying to move towards equilibrium. I’d encourage you to read some college-level earth science books from pre-1990s.
Your first article/link could easily be explained by the Great Flood. We can assume the global oceanscape drastically changed after such an event. A 12,000 year old city is mostly in line with the young earth theory.
Your second article/link is written by someone who identifies her pronouns and writes articles on paleontology, Hollywood dinosaurs and other fake shit. So that example won’t fly because it’s science fiction, not science.