I do not see evidence this is much beyond speculative. I.e., not real science. It uses buzzwords but conceptually only applies them to some smoke and mirrors, so beware. There is no evidence of mechanisms in vivo using carbon nanotubes connecting neurons. Literature on CN and neurons started about 14 years ago but it covered making CN base structure then putting neurons on them. There are no known means to make nanotubes in vivo and using them to connect neurons, although it can be done in the lab.

Also, it contains some flaws. It references plasmonic nanoantennas but such structures are NOT organic nor compatible with an organic environment. These are made of metals and things like precious metals. There aren't really organic, cellular means to make them in vivo.

If there is someone putting this into vaccines, they are far ahead of human research. Might the fabled rumored alien labs under Dulce be real?

Also, I'm not buying the idea there are cellular-level routers made of nanotech.

I do not see any evidence this is much beyond speculative. I.e., not real science. It uses buzzwords but conceptually only applies them to some smoke and mirrors, so beware. There is no evidence of mechanisms using carbon nanotubes connecting neurons.

Also, it contains some flaws. It references plasmonic nanoantennas but such structures are NOT organic nor compatible with an organic environment. These are made of metals and things like precious metals. There aren't really organic, cellular means to make them in vitro.

Also, I'm not buying the idea there are cellular-level routers made of nanotech.