Talking about the RTV, not the metal. Obviously.

First, seems you don't even know what RTV is. RTV is "Room Temperature Vulcanisation". It is a property of material, not material name or brand. It could be rubber, polyurethane, silicone, butadien-stirole, any elastic polymer that will cure at room temperature.

Second. Silicone itself does not outgas at al. It will decompose earlier, than it reach outgasing temperature. Silicone outgasing with reducing amount of material due to loss of atoms or molecules is a complete nonsense, unlike for metal, ice and other substances that at least could outgas into space under specific circumstances.

Third. 2k silicone rubber have silicone oils and solvents in components to make mixing and applying easier. After curing (vulcanisation) this components still present between created silicone polymer chains. Table about outgassing silicone compounds is about evapouration of that componenets from silicone resin, not about silicone itself. Evapouration of thinners and oils does not make silicone rubber weaker or make it loose any sealing properties. But it harmful for vacuum in vacuum chambers. F.e. I have a small vacuum chamber for restoration of vintage cars headlights reflectors with vacuum metal vapour deposition. With fresh gasket for vacuum bell, I geting bad results of deposition, weak adhesion, because of that thinners from 2k silicone that outgas and interfere with metal vapours. I need around 2 days under vacuum to get rid of that nasty substances that contaminate my vacuum, and then silicone gasket works perfectly. It does not evapourate, it just get rid of thinners and comtaminate vacuum. That is why silicone compounds tested for outgasing of additives. Meanwhile even cheap 1k silicone from hardware store will work perfectly in any vacuum. You just need more time to dry it in air, and more time to dry under vacuum. Silicone compounds designed specifically for vacuum gaskets have less additives so have less vacuum contamination. It is all about fucking vacuum chamber contamination, not about silicone disapeearing.

Again and again, you show that you don't want to know how things work. You just found some stupid screenshot and post it here.

What is the source of that screenshot? Where did you get it? Who told you to post it here? Let me guess, you, suddenly, will never answer this questions. :)

Let's hear your list of "acceptable" moonhoax theories

1. Where is moon soil? Why NASA presented USSR only few dozen grams of moon soil, less than USSR presented to NASA just before? They presumably bring 382 kg of moon soil, but presented only few dozen grams of soil that was suddenly identical to one that USSR presented to NASA.

2. How Apollo crews was able to walk and stay on foot right after the landing? A week in low gravity conditions does not allow that.

3. Why huge part of important documentation of Apollo project was destroyed? That is not what people do with documentation of greatest achievement of humanity.

4. Why after that huge success with heavy duty rockets, great docking expirience and so on, NASA curtailed any long term missions to space and all space station projects? NASA resumed long term missions only with Mir space station.

Talking about the RTV, not the metal. Obviously.

First, seems you don't even know what RTV is. RTV is "Room Temperature Vulcanisation". It is a property of material, not material name or brand. It could be rubber, polyurethane, silicone, butadien-stirole, any elastic polymer that will cure at room temperature.

Second. Silicone itself does not outgas at al. It will decompose earlier, than it reach outgasing temperature.

Third. 2k silicone rubber have silicone oils and solvents in components to make mixing and applying easier. After curing (vulcanisation) this components still present between created silicone polymer chains. Table about outgassing silicone compounds is about evapouration of that componenets from silicone resin, not about silicone itself. Evapouration of thinners and oils does not make silicone rubber weaker or make it loose any sealing properties. But it harmful for vacuum in vacuum chambers. F.e. I have a small vacuum chamber for restoration of vintage cars headlights reflectors with vacuum metal vapour deposition. With fresh gasket for vacuum bell, I geting bad results of deposition, weak adhesion, because of that thinners from 2k silicone that outgas and interfere with metal vapours. I need around 2 days under vacuum to get rid of that nasty substances that contaminate my vacuum, and then silicone gasket works perfectly. It does not evapourate, it just get rid of thinners and comtaminate vacuum. That is why silicone compounds tested for outgasing of additives. Meanwhile even cheap 1k silicone from hardware store will work perfectly in any vacuum. You just need more time to dry it in air, and more time to dry under vacuum. Silicone compounds designed specifically for vacuum gaskets have less additives so have less vacuum contamination. It is all about fucking vacuum chamber contamination, not about silicone disapeearing.

Again and again, you show that you don't want to know how things work. You just found some stupid screenshot and post it here.

What is the source of that screenshot? Where did you get it? Who told you to post it here? Let me guess, you, suddenly, will never answer this questions. :)

Let's hear your list of "acceptable" moonhoax theories

1. Where is moon soil? Why NASA presented USSR only few dozen grams of moon soil, less than USSR presented to NASA just before? They presumably bring 382 kg of moon soil, but presented only few dozen grams of soil that was suddenly identical to one that USSR presented to NASA.

2. How Apollo crews was able to walk and stay on foot right after the landing? A week in low gravity conditions does not allow that.

3. Why huge part of important documentation of Apollo project was destroyed? That is not what people do with documentation of greatest achievement of humanity.

4. Why after that huge success with heavy duty rockets, great docking expirience and so on, NASA curtailed any long term missions to space and all space station projects? NASA resumed long term missions only with Mir space station.

Talking about the RTV, not the metal. Obviously.

First, seems you don't even know what RTV is. RTV is "Room Temperature Vulcanisation". It is a property of material, not material name.

Second. Silicone itself does not outgase at al. It will decompose earlier, than it reach outgasing temperature.

Third. 2k silicone rubber have silicone oils and solvents in components. After curing (vulcanisation) this components still present between created silicone polymer chains. Table about outgassing silicone compounds is about evapouration of that componenets from silicone resin, not about silicone itself. Evapouration of thinners and oils does not make silicone weaker or make it loose any sealing properties. But it harmful for vacuum in vacuum chambers. F.e. I have a small vacuum chamber for restoration of vintage cars headlights reflectors with vacuum metal vapour deposition. With fresh gasket for vacuum bell, I get bad results of deposition, because of that thinners from 2k silicone that outgas and interfere with metal vapour. I need around 2 days under vacuum to get rid of that nasty substances that contaminate vacuum, and then silicone gasket works perfectly. It does not evapourate, it just get rid of thinners and comtaminate vacuum. That is why silicone compounds tested for outgasing of additives. Meanwhile even cheap 1k silicone from hardware store will work perfectly in any vacuum. You just need more time to dry it in air, and more time to dry under vacuum. Silicone compounds designed specifically for vacuum gaskets have less additives so have less vacuum contamination. It is all about fucking vacuum chamber contamination, not about silicone disapeearing.

Again and again, you show that you don't want to know how things work. You just found some stupid screenshot and post it here.

What is the source of that screenshot? Where did you get it? Who told you to post it here? Let me guess, you, suddenly, will never answer this questions. :)

Let's hear your list of "acceptable" moonhoax theories

1. Where is moon soil? Why NASA presented USSR only few dozen grams of moon soil, less than USSR presented to NASA just before? They presumably bring 382 kg of moon soil, but presented only few dozen grams of soil that was suddenly identical to one that USSR presented to NASA.

2. How Apollo crews was able to walk and stay on foot right after the landing? A week in low gravity conditions does not allow that.

3. Why huge part of important documentation of Apollo project was destroyed? That is not what people do with documentation of greatest achievement of humanity.

4. Why after that huge success with heavy duty rockets, great docking expirience and so on, NASA curtailed any long term missions to space and all space station projects? NASA resumed long term missions only with Mir space station.