In 2020, he was one of the early dissenting voices around COVID because he researched its patent – finding that published genomic sequences of the virus were patented as early as 2015. His argument was that one couldn't patent a naturally occurring phenomenon and that the virus only existed as a computer model, ergo had never been "isolated," and therefore couldn't be identified as a disease-causing pathogen.
So, I'm genuinely confused as to why he now has this stance: the virus is a real thing, able to cause disease, transmissible, and made in a lab by evil scientists. Was he co-opted into this narrative or is there something I'm not understanding?
Other researchers have arguably debunked the whole study of "virology" as being a fraud since its inception, and I personally believe that the R&D done by EcoHealth and Wuhan were to perfect the various poisons in the vaccines and possibly those to be introduced in the near future.
Edited for clarity considering comment from u/megalithicallstar.
In 2020, he was one of the early dissenting voices around COVID because he researched its patent – finding that published genomic sequences of the virus were patented as early as 2015. His argument was that one couldn't patent a naturally occurring phenomenon and that the virus only existed as a computer model, ergo had never been "isolated," and therefore couldn't be identified as a disease-causing pathogen.
So, I'm genuinely confused as to why he now has this stance: the virus is a real thing, able to cause disease, transmissible, and made in a lab by evil scientists. Was he co-opted into this narrative or is there something I'm not understanding?
Other researchers have arguably debunked the whole study of "virology" as being a fraud since its inception, and I personally believe that the R&D done by EcoHealth and Wuhan were to perfect the various poisons in the vaccines and possibly those to be introduced in the near future.
In 2020, he was one of the early dissenting voices around COVID because he researched its patent – finding that published genomic sequences of the virus were patented as early as 2015. His argument was that one couldn't patent a naturally occurring phenomenon and that the virus only existed as a computer model, ergo had never been "isolated," and therefore couldn't be identified as a disease-causing pathogen.
So, I'm genuinely confused as to why he now has this stance, where the virus is a real thing, able to cause disease, transmissible, and made in a lab by evil scientists. Was he co-opted into this narrative or is there something I'm not understanding?
Other researchers have arguably debunked the whole study of "virology" as being a fraud since its inception, and I personally believe that the R&D done by EcoHealth and Wuhan were to perfect the various poisons in the vaccines and possibly those to be introduced in the near future.