Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

No, it isn't. Not that I agree with it or choose it.

It's a product of experience through choice and environment, causing instinct and preference. Hormones develop causing interaction causing experience.

Although any experience probably develops younger. I am sure we've seen kids, kiss, far younger than puberty as example. Let's suggest an environment was around a babysitter or parents or older siblings having sex that a child possibly encountered, it could try to mimic, like kissing, and experiment and interact. Let's suggest trauma, abuse, or a restricted environment limiting choice. Let's suggest rejection or rebellion. Let's suggest choice becoming a habit an addiction a desire.

By suggesting it's a rogue gene is ignorant. Trans use this, and it is dumbfounded. Because Trans not in their majority have defects such as abnormal genitals, like conjoined twins, or supposed chromosone imbalances. But they will still develop into their natural biology and would anyway if it weren't for choice by medicine. Until it becomes an excuse by medicine to keep promoting experiments. Until it has nothing to do with Trans. Rather Transhumanism.

The fact is mammals are bisexual, far more so in domesticated and restricted environments. It will always be this case in this species having sex.

Psychology and medicine need to provide a reason often as an excuse condoning or simply tolerating because it profits. The fact is hormones drive sex. How that sexuality develops is by interaction and experience becoming choices. No other dysfunction.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

No, it isn't. Not that I agree with it or choose it.

It's a product of experience through choice and environment, causing instinct and preference. Hormones develop causing interaction causing experience.

Although any experience probably develops younger. I am sure we've seen kids, kiss, far younger than puberty as example. Let's suggest an environment was around a babysitter or parents or older siblings having sex that a child possibly encountered, it could try to mimic, like kissing, and experiment and interact. Let's suggest trauma, abuse, or a restricted environment limiting choice. Let's suggest rejection or rebellion. Let's suggest choice becoming a habit an addiction a desire.

By suggesting it's a rogue gene is ignorant. Trans use this, and it is dumbfounded. Because Trans not in their majority have defects such as abnormal genitals, like conjoined twins, or supposed chromosone imbalances. But they will still develop into their natural biology and would anyway if it weren't for choice by medicine. Until it becomes an excuse by medicine to keep promoting experiments. Until it has nothing to do with Trans. Rather Transhumanism.

The fact is mammals are bisexual, far more so in domesticated and restricted environments. It will always be this case in this species having sex.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

No, it isn't. Not that I agree with it or choose it.

It's a product of experience through choice and environment, causing instinct and preference. Hormones develop causing interaction causing experience.

Although any experience probably develops younger. I am sure we've seen kids, kiss, far younger than puberty as example. Let's suggest an environment was around a babysitter or parents or older siblings having sex that a child possibly encountered, it could try to mimic, like kissing, and experiment and interact. Let's suggest trauma, abuse, or a restricted environment limiting choice. Let's suggest rejection or rebellion.

By suggesting it's a rogue gene is ignorant. Trans use this, and it is dumbfounded. Because Trans not in their majority have defects such as abnormal genitals, like conjoined twins, or supposed chromosone imbalances. But they will still develop into their natural biology and would anyway if it weren't for choice by medicine. Until it becomes an excuse by medicine to keep promoting experiments. Until it has nothing to do with Trans. Rather Transhumanism.

The fact is mammals are bisexual, far more so in domesticated and restricted environments. It will always be this case in this species having sex.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

No, it isn't. Not that I agree with it or choose it.

It's a product of experience through choice and environment, causing instinct and preference. Hormones develop causing interaction causing experience.

Although any experience probably develops younger. I am sure we've seen kids, kiss, far younger than puberty as example. Let's suggest an environment was around a babysitter or parents having sex that a child possibly encountered, it could try to mimic, like kissing, and experiment and interact. Let's suggest trauma, abuse, or a restricted environment limiting choice. Let's suggest rejection or rebellion.

By suggesting it's a rogue gene is ignorant. Trans use this, and it is dumbfounded. Because Trans not in their majority have defects such as abnormal genitals, like conjoined twins, or supposed chromosone imbalances. But they will still develop into their natural biology and would anyway if it weren't for choice by medicine. Until it becomes an excuse by medicine to keep promoting experiments. Until it has nothing to do with Trans. Rather Transhumanism.

The fact is mammals are bisexual, far more so in domesticated and restricted environments. It will always be this case in this species having sex.

1 year ago
1 score