Nobody should have these devices. If they constitute an invasion of privacy. How was it accessed? It like anything else, illegal, should have been treated as such.

Where is the rest of that footage. The years of intolerance. Instead it has acted as executioner off of hearsay. Who knows the rest of it. It looks staged. What does it even prove. A bad day at the office?

Seriously it is criminal that the footage was released. There was laws on it. It is an invasion. Prior too today, but these devices are creeping on everybody. She didn't record him either. It wasn't her own footage, and her personal device. It was accessed how, and under what pretense? A divorce, spare us all that bullshit gossip. It should be subjected to the full extent of the law. Suing that device into censorship, so it doesn't invade our rights.

I do not condone his behaviour. I condemn that access being put out publicly.

Nobody should have these devices. If they constitute an invasion of privacy. How was it accessed? It like anything else, illegal, should have been treated as such.

Where is the rest of that footage. The years of intolerance. Instead it has acted as executioner off of hearsay. Who knows the rest of it. It looks staged. What does it even prove. A bad day at the office?

Seriously it is criminal that the footage was released. There was laws on it. It is an invasion. Prior today, but these devices are creeping on everybody. She didn't record him either. It wasn't her own footage, and her personal device. It was accessed how, and under what pretense. A divorce, spare us all that bullshit gossip. It should be subjected to the full extent of the law. Suing that device into censorship, so it doesn't invade our rights.

I do not condone his behaviour. I condemn that access being put out publicly.