Of course I understand news bias and intention to show the worst, and as I mentioned, even in such biased news I still see untouched normal buildings surrounded by devastation.
But it is still unclear for me why in such hurricane rich places still exist any areas that continue to give that devastation footage for the news.
IDK, say nobody build houses in the Northen regions without good thermal insulation. So even if you need a fearmongering picture of hundreds of frozen out houses with freezing families in trouble from yearly disaster named winter, you will not be able to find anything.
But somehow, in the abovementioned Florida, there are still plenty of places where news could easily get nasty pictures of devastation every year.
Plenty of builders do exactly as you mention.
I understand that. I don't understand why there still exists districts or counties that get destroyed every year.
There are no districts or counties that massively freeze out to death every year in nothern regions f.e. But in much more pleasant (and so more expensive) places to live, somehow such districts exists.
Sorry to interrupt the anti-america circle jerk.
Funny, I mentioned f,e. Montana where, suddenly, people never build houses that are not suitable for local weather conditions. You hardly find a a single house with thin walls and without insulation that will not withstand cold weather in winter. Somehow Montana is not a part of US now?
If you want to stick a label to me, choose something else. Say something about "anti-southern coastal circle-jerk" or whatever term you have for that hurricane prone regions.
If you are heavily abused by comparison of something american with something from other country and feel raped or offended like LGBTXYZ+ whiners, then tell me please, why in Montana US people always build houses appropriate for local regular cold winters, but in Florida US people are not always build houses appropriate for regular hurricanes. Both states I compare here are in US, so you should not be offended.
Of course I understand news bias and intention to show the worst, and as I mentioned, even in such biased news I still see untouched normal buildings surrounded by devastation.
But it is still unclear for me why in such hurricane rich places still exist any areas that continue to give that devastation footage for the news.
IDK, say nobody build houses in the Northen regions without good thermal insulation. So even if you need a fearmongering picture of hundreds of frozen out houses with freezing families in trouble from yearly disaster named winter, you will not be able to find anything.
But somehow, in the abovementioned Florida, there are still plenty of places where news could easily get nasty pictures of devastation every year.
Plenty of builders do exactly as you mention.
I understand that. I don't understand why there still exists districts or counties that get destroyed every year.
There are no districts or counties that massively freeze out to death every year in nothern regions f.e. But in much more pleasant (and so more expensive) places to live, somehow such districts exists.
Sorry to interrupt the anti-america circle jerk.
Funny, I mentioned f,e. Montana where, suddenly, people never build houses that are not suitable for local weather conditions. You hardly find a a single house with thin walls and without insulation that will not withstand cold weather in winter. Somehow Montana is not a part of US now?
If you want to stick a label to me, choose something else. Say something about "anti-southern coastal circle-jerk" or whatever term you have for that hurricane prone regions.
If you are heavily abused by comparison of something american with something from other country and feel raped or offended like LGBTXYZ+ whiners, then tell me please, why in Montana US people always build houses appropriate for local regular cold winters, but in Florida US people are not always build houses appropriate for regular hurricanes. Both states I compare are in US, so you should not be offended.
Of course I understand news bias and intention to show the worst, and as I mentioned, even in such biased news I still see untouched normal buildings surrounded by devastation.
But it is still unclear for me why in such hurricane rich places still exist any areas that continue to give that devastation footage for the news.
IDK, say nobody build houses in the Northen regions without good thermal insulation. So even if you need a fearmongering picture of hundreds of frozen out houses with freezing families in trouble from yearly disaster named winter, you will not be able to find anything.
But somehow, in the abovementioned Florida, there are still plenty of places where news could easily get nasty pictures of devastation every year.
Plenty of builders do exactly as you mention.
I understand that. I don't understand why there still exists districts or counties that get destroyed every year.
There are no districts or counties that massively freeze out to death every year in nothern regions f.e. But in much more pleasant (and so more expensive) places to live, somehow such districts exists.
Sorry to interrupt the anti-america circle jerk.
Funny, I mentioned that in Montana people never build houses that are not suitable for local weather conditions. You hardly find a a single house with thin walls that will not withstand cold weather in winter. Somehow Montana is not a part of US now?
If you want to stick a label to me, choose something else. Say something about "anti-southern coastal circle-jerk" or whatever term you have for that hurricane prone regions.
If you are heavily abused by comparison of something american with something from other country and feel raped or offended like LGBTXYZ+ whiners, then tell me please, why in Montana US people always build houses appropriate for local regular cold winters, but in Florida US people are not always build houses appropriate for regular hurricanes. Both states I compare are in US, so you should not be offended.