Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

NZ is a terrible choice. Especially the top Island with the Capital. I cannot think of worse geography to be fair. It's situated on a Super Volcano of which it currently has active volcanoes, and a huge fault line. They are otherwise imminent and are having increasing activity. With bigger tectonics due. New Zealand, has already had a sizable chunk of it sunk Zealandia.

Being remote isn't always the best choice. Antarctica another joke needs constant resupplying to survive indefinitely. Imagine that the World has just been decimated by nuclear war, but you're on a continent of ice with competing armies. Russia and China are on Antarctica and have Military and Research bases. Both are also aware of any other installations. Does the Antarctic treaty hold? Besides there are possibly even nukes on Antarctica. They have shot nukes from Antarctica, atmosphere tests when was this the 50s, 60s. It has nuclear reactors on it. Russia has also supposedly tested pole to pole and recently?

Back to NZ, what army has NZ got. Almost any other nation like China could walk into it. In that scenario its population has suddenly become anarchic. It barely contained them in COVID, but WW3 hahaha.

Australia has the nukes. There are few islands, supposedly governed by NZ which are also probable for them. At least navy installations and docks.

I find the topic laughable. Bonga boo hasn't got a nice little warhead predesignated. 10 years from now, even currently. They're on hunter seeker drones. These fully autonomous drones in fully autonomous factory refuelling them, like that film interstellar? Why. Because at what fucking point on a reset do they want bonga boo recolonising the globe. They've put those things practically everywhere else. The amount that have by treaty, alliance, or their own gain isn't what any Wiki says either. Who knows and who cares. Edgy topic. But they're in the fucking ice. Greenland had them. The Russian Arctic has them increasingly. The amount of Northern bases Russia has just put up, missile defense, and remote launchers. Bonga Boo would be so lucky right? Some mountainback community underground out in the deep jungle in the middle of continent somewhere. Bonga boo. Whoops.

Nobody is thinking of this scenario quite yet. What is that point. Would it even escalate into all out war if Kiev was obliterated? I doubt anybody will test that theory yet.

Besides the war seems as stupid as WW1. Trench warfare. I still don't understand this today. How grav bombs, carpet bombs, hypersonics, hasn't stopped the trench warfare. They've been throwing troops back and forth along fortified trench lines and towns. This like WW1 yes? All it did was deplete troops. It seems something is questionable about it. I cannot put a finger on this. But how has this occurred? Need hundreds of thousands of troops. Causality Ukraine is in the millions, Russia's are high. What is going on. Running out of bullets. Umm? Umm? Running out of tanks. Hear this constantly in the news. Artillery versus artillery some bullshit trenches, and charge playing capture flag. Oddly. What is this? At what point aren't there tactical nukes. I mean it would save lives. But okay the napalm. Nope. The grav bombs. The father of bombs. Something. Not trenches, stalling it. Drawing it. Dragging it on. Something is wrong.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

NZ is a terrible choice. Especially the top Island with the Capital. I cannot think of worse geography to be fair. It's situated on a Super Volcano of which it currently has active volcanoes, and a huge fault line. They are otherwise imminent and are having increasing activity. With bigger tectonics due. New Zealand, has already had a sizable chunk of it sunk Zealandia.

Being remote isn't always the best choice. Antarctica another joke needs constant resupplying to survive indefinitely. Imagine that the World has just been decimated by nuclear war, but you're on a continent of ice with competing armies. Russia and China are on Antarctica and have Military and Research bases. Both are also aware of any other installations. Does the Antarctic treaty hold? Besides there are possibly even nukes on Antarctica. They have shot nukes from Antarctica, atmosphere tests when was this the 50s, 60s. It has nuclear reactors on it. Russia has also supposedly tested pole to pole and recently?

Back to NZ, what army has NZ got. Almost any other nation like China could walk into it. In that scenario its population has suddenly become anarchic. It barely contained them in COVID, but WW3 hahaha.

Australia has the nukes. There are few islands, supposedly governed by NZ which are also probable for them. At least navy installations and docks.

I find the topic laughable. Bonga boo hasn't got a nice little warhead predesignated. 10 years from now, even currently. They're on hunter seeker drones. These fully autonomous drones in fully autonomous factory refuelling them, like that film interstellar? Why. Because at what fucking point on a reset do they want bonga boo recolonising the globe. They've put those things practically everywhere else. The amount that have by treaty, alliance, or their own gain isn't what any Wiki says either. Who knows and who cares. Edgy topic. But they're in the fucking ice. Greenland had them. The Russian Arctic has them increasingly. The amount of Northern bases Russia has just put up, missile defense, and remote launchers. Bonga Boo would be so lucky right? Some mountainback community underground out in the deep jungle in the middle of continent somewhere. Bonga boo. Whoops.

Nobody is thinking of this scenario quite yet. What is that point. Would it even escalate into all out war if Kiev was obliterated? I doubt anybody will test that theory yet.

Besides the war seems as stupid as WW1. Trench warfare. I still don't understand this today. How grav bombs, carpet bombs, hypersonics, hasn't stopped the trench warfare. They've been throwing troops back and forth along fortified trench lines and towns. This like WW1 yes? All it did was deplete troops. It seems something is questionable about it. I cannot put a finger on this. But how has this occurred? Need hundreds of thousands of troops. Causality Ukraine is in the millions, Russia's are high. What is going on. Running out of bullets. Umm? Umm? Running out of tanks. Hear this constantly in the news. Artillery versus artillery some bullshit trenches, and charge playing capture flag. Oddly. What is this? At what point aren't tactical nuke. I mean it would save lives. But okay the napalm. Nope. The grav bombs. The father of bombs. Something. Not trenches, stalling it. Drawing it. Dragging it on. Something is wrong.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

NZ is a terrible choice. Especially the top Island with the Capital. I cannot think of worse geography to be fair. It's situated on a Super Volcano of which it currently has active volcanoes, and a huge fault line. They are otherwise imminent and are having increasing activity. With bigger tectonics due. New Zealand, has already had a sizable chunk of it sunk Zealandia.

Being remote isn't always the best choice. Antarctica another joke needs constant resupplying to survive indefinitely. Imagine that the World has just been decimated by nuclear war, but you're on a continent of ice with competing armies. Russia and China are on Antarctica and have Military and Research bases. Both are also aware of any other installations. Does the Antarctic treaty hold? Besides there are possibly even nukes on Antarctica. They have shot nukes from Antarctica, atmosphere tests when was this the 50s, 60s. It has nuclear reactors on it. Russia has also supposedly tested pole to pole and recently?

Back to NZ, what army has NZ got. Almost any other nation like China could walk into it. In that scenario its population has suddenly become anarchic. It barely contained them in COVID, but WW3 hahaha.

Australia has the nukes. There are few islands, supposedly governed by NZ which are also probable for them. At least navy installations and docks.

I find the topic laughable. Bonga boo hasn't got a nice little warhead predesignated. 10 years from now, even currently. They're on hunter seeker drones. These fully autonomous drones in fully autonomous factory refuelling them, like that film interstellar? Why. Because at what fucking point on a reset do they want bonga boo recolonising the globe. They've put those things practically everywhere else. The amount that have by treaty, alliance, or their own gain isn't what any Wiki says either. Who knows and who cares. Edgy topic. But they're in the fucking ice. Greenland had them. The Russian Arctic has them increasingly. The amount of Northern bases Russia has just put up, missile defense, and remote launchers. Bonga Boo would be so lucky right? Some mountainback community underground out in the deep jungle in the middle of continent somewhere. Bonga boo. Whoops.

Nobody is thinking of this scenario quite yet. What is that point. Would it even escalate into all out war if Kiev was obliterated? I doubt anybody will test that theory yet.

Besides the war seems as stupid as WW1. Trench warfare. I still don't understand this today. How grav bombs, carpet bombs, hypersonics, hasn't stopped the trench warfare. They've been throwing troops back and forth along fortified trench lines and towns. This like WW1 yes? All it did was deplete troops. It seems something is questionable about it. I cannot put a finger on this. But how has this occurred? Need hundreds of thousands of troops. Causality Ukraine is in the millions, Russia's are high. What is going on. Running out of bullets. Umm? Umm? Running out of tanks. Hear this constantly in the news. Artillery versus artillery some bullshit trenches, and charge playing capture flag. Oddly. What is this? At what point aren't tactical nuke. I mean it would save lives. But okay the napalm. Nope. The grav bombs. The father of bombs. Something. Not trenches, stalling it. Drawing it. Dragging it on.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

NZ is a terrible choice. Especially the top Island with the Capital. I cannot think of worse geography to be fair. It's situated on a Super Volcano of which it currently has active volcanoes, and a huge fault line. They are otherwise imminent and are having increasing activity. With bigger tectonics due. New Zealand, has already had a sizable chunk of it sunk Zealandia.

Being remote isn't always the best choice. Antarctica another joke needs constant resupplying to survive indefinitely. Imagine that the World has just been decimated by nuclear war, but you're on a continent of ice with competing armies. Russia and China are on Antarctica and have Military and Research bases. Both are also aware of any other installations. Does the Antarctic treaty hold? Besides there are possibly even nukes on Antarctica. They have shot nukes from Antarctica, atmosphere tests when was this the 50s, 60s. It has nuclear reactors on it. Russia has also supposedly tested pole to pole and recently?

Back to NZ, what army has NZ got. Almost any other nation like China could walk into it. In that scenario its population has suddenly become anarchic. It barely contained them in COVID, but WW3 hahaha.

Australia has the nukes. There are few islands, supposedly governed by NZ which are also probable for them. At least navy installations and docks.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

NZ is a terrible choice. Especially the top Island with the Capital. I cannot think of worse geography to be fair. It's situated on a Super Volcano of which it currently has active volcanoes, and a huge fault line. They are otherwise imminent and are having increasing activity. With bigger tectonics due. New Zealand, has already had a sizable chunk of it sunk Zealandia.

Being remote isn't always the best choice. Antarctica another joke needs constant resupplying to survive indefinitely. Imagine that the World has just been decimated by nuclear war, but you're on a continent of ice with competing armies. Russia and China are on Antarctica and have Military and Research bases. Both are also aware of any other installations. Does the Antarctic treaty hold? Besides there are possibly even nukes on Antarctica. They have shot nukes from Antarctica, atmosphere tests when was this the 50s, 60s. It has nuclear reactors on it. Russia has also supposedly tested pole to pole and recently?

Back to NZ, what army has NZ got. Almost any other nation like China could walk into it. In that scenario its population has suddenly become anarchic. It barely contained them in COVID, but WW3 hahaha.

Australia has the nukes. There are few islands, supposedly governed by NZ which are also probable for them. At least navy docks.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

NZ is a terrible choice. Especially the top Island with the Capital. I cannot think of worse geography to be fair. It's situated on a Super Volcano of which it currently has active volcanoes, and a huge fault line. They are otherwise imminent and are having increasing activity. With bigger tectonics due. New Zealand, has already had a sizable chunk of it sunk Zealandia.

Being remote isn't always the best choice. Antarctica another joke needs constant resupplying to survive indefinitely. Imagine that the World has just been decimated by nuclear war, but you're on a continent of ice with competing armies. Russia and China are on Antarctica and have Military and Research bases. Both are also aware of any other installations. Does the Antarctic treaty hold? Besides there are possibly even nukes on Antarctica. They have shot nukes from Antarctica, atmosphere tests when was this the 50s, 60s. I has nuclear reactors on it. Russia has also supposedly tested pole to pole and recently?

Back to NZ, what army has NZ got. Almost any other nation like China could walk into it. In that scenario its population has suddenly become anarchic. It barely contained them in COVID, but WW3 hahaha.

Australia has the nukes. There are few islands, supposedly governed by NZ which are also probable for them. At least navy docks.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

NZ is a terrible choice. Especially the top Island with the Capital. I cannot think of worse geography to be fair. It's situated on a Super Volcano of which it currently has active volcanoes, and a huge fault line. They are otherwise imminent and are having increasing activity. With bigger tectonics due. New Zealand, has already had a sizable chunk of it sunk Zealandia.

Being remote isn't always the best choice. Antarctica another joke needs constant resupplying to survive indefinitely. Imagine that the World has just been decimated by nuclear war, but you're on a continent of ice with competing armies. Russia and China are on Antarctica and have Military and Research bases. Both are also aware of any other installations. Does the Antarctic treaty hold? Besides there are possibly even nukes on Antarctica. They have shot nukes from Antarctica, atmosphere tests when was this the 50s, 60s. I think has nuclear reactors. Russia has also supposedly tested pole to pole and recently?

Back to NZ, what army has NZ got. Almost any other nation like China could walk into it. In that scenario its population has suddenly become anarchic. It barely contained them in COVID, but WW3 hahaha.

Australia has the nukes. There are few islands, supposedly governed by NZ which are also probable for them. At least navy docks.

1 year ago
1 score