Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Yes, but it's whether somebody diagnosed with mental health conditions, read their response to the shooting, it has outlined why Trans shouldn't own guns, has a right to firearms to begin with.

The same current laws are mental health conditions don't. The statistic of suicidal Trans is the highest out of any demographic, and out of any event, or reason. Those numbers are above 70% of Trans have mental health conditions, primarily are suicidal.

Not seizing firearms, that landmark, after having supposed firearms. It was on a police seizure. Obviously seizing gun rights are quite concerning affecting the right to own guns. Any diagnosis was a single medical opinion. How valid was it. The reaction seems overblown.

Regardless it is concerning how nobody else is authorised with guns to begin with, if currently, they have the same mental conditions, the same Trans have. Read their own response. Their words. Yet there they are branishing them psychotically. Further they are being paraded as a sane and responsible choice, when anybody else with the same mental health conditions aren't paraded. In fact they're excluded from most roles of public service if they have those mental health conditions.

My suggestion of a Supreme Court Judgement is on their Status.

Because it is absurd. Irrationally illogical. There is a demographic of people where the medicine they take has clear warning labels on it. The health and mental conditions the majority have aren't by the same current laws fit to own guns. It is incredibly alarming they're paraded to children when they're an even bigger danger to themselves and others.

The current gun laws are medical checks, specifically mental health. You cannot purchase guns without clearance. Except Trans have invalidated this. Trans can.

The same mental conditions aren't fit to be around children, teaching, in any other capacity, outside of giving birth, or supposedly parenting kids birthed. The same mental health conditions aren't fit for any kind of active duty.

Read that response. Their words. Obviously it is the biggest oxymoron. Why have they been given status? They are in fact a danger.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Yes, but it's whether somebody diagnosed with mental health conditions, read their response to the shooting, it has outlined why Trans shouldn't own guns, has a right to firearms to begin with.

The same current laws are mental health conditions don't. The statistic of suicidal Trans is the highest out of any demographic, and out of any event, or reason. Those numbers are above 70% of Trans have mental health conditions, primarily are suicidal.

Not seizing firearms, that landmark, after having supposed firearms. It was on a police seizure. Obviously seizing gun rights are quite concerning affecting the right to own guns. Any diagnosis was a single medical opinion. How valid was it. The reaction seems overblown.

Regardless it is concerning how nobody else is authorised with guns to begin with, if currently, they have the same mental conditions, the same Trans have. Read their own response. Their words. Yet there they are branishing them psychotically. Further they are being paraded as a sane and responsible choice, when anybody else with the same mental health conditions aren't paraded. In fact they're excluded from most roles of public service if they have those mental health conditions.

My suggestion of a Supreme Court Judgement is on their Status.

Because it is absurd. Irrationally illogical. There is a demographic of people where the medicine they take has clear warning labels on it. The health and mental conditions the majority have aren't by the same current laws fit to own guns. It is incredibly alarming they're paraded to children when they're an even bigger danger to themselves and others.

The current gun laws are medical checks, specifically mental health. You cannot purchase guns without clearance. Except Trans have invalidated this. Trans can.

The same mental conditions aren't fit to be around children, in any other capacity, outside giving birth. The same mental health conditions aren't fit for any kind of active duty.

Read that response. Their words. Obviously it is the biggest oxymoron. Why have they been given status? They are in fact a danger.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Yes, but it's whether somebody diagnosed with mental health conditions, read their response to the shooting, it has outlined why Trans shouldn't own guns, has a right to firearms to begin with.

The same current laws are mental health conditions don't. The statistic of suicidal Trans is the highest out of any demographic, and out of any event, or reason. Those numbers are above 70% of Trans have mental health conditions, primarily are suicidal.

Not seizing firearms, that landmark, after having supposed firearms. It was on a police seizure. Obviously seizing gun rights are quite concerning affecting the right to own guns. Any diagnosis was a single medical opinion. How valid was it. The reaction seems overblown.

Regardless it is concerning how nobody else is authorised with guns to begin with, if currently, they have the same mental conditions, the same Trans have. Read their own response. Their words. Yet there they are branishing them psychotically. Further they are being paraded as a sane and responsible choice, when anybody else with the same mental health conditions aren't paraded. In fact they're excluded from most roles of public service if they have those mental health conditions.

My suggestion of a Supreme Court Judgement is on their Status.

Because it is absurd. Irrationally illogical. There is a demographic of people where the medicine they take has clear warning labels on it. The health and mental conditions the majority have aren't by the same current laws fit to own guns. It is incredibly alarming they're paraded to children when they're an even bigger danger to themselves and others.

The current gun laws are medical checks, specifically mental health. You cannot purchase guns without clearance. Except Trans have invalidated this. Trans can.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Yes, but it's whether somebody diagnosed with mental health conditions, read their response to the shooting, it has outlined why Trans shouldn't own guns, has a right to firearms to begin with.

The same current laws are mental health conditions don't. The statistic of suicidal Trans is the highest out of any demographic, and out of any event, or reason. Those numbers are above 70% of Trans have mental health conditions, primarily are suicidal.

Not seizing firearms, that landmark, after having supposed firearms. It was on a police seizure. Obviously seizing gun rights are quite concerning affecting the right to own guns. Any diagnosis was a single medical opinion. How valid was it. The reaction seems overblown.

Regardless it is concerning how nobody else is authorised with guns to begin with, if currently, they have the same mental conditions, the same Trans have. Read their own response. Their words. Yet there they are branishing them psychotically. Further they are being paraded as a sane and responsible choice, when anybody else with the same mental health conditions aren't paraded. In fact they're excluded from most roles of public service if they have those mental health conditions.

My suggestion of a Supreme Court Judgement is on their Status.

Because it is absurd. Irrationally illogical. There is a demographic of people where the medicine they take has clear warning labels on it. The health and mental conditions the majority have aren't by the same current laws fit to own guns. It is incredibly alarming they're paraded to children when they're an even bigger danger to themselves and others.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Yes, but it's whether somebody diagnosed with mental health conditions, read their response to the shooting, it has outlined why Trans shouldn't own guns, has a right to firearms to begin with.

The same current laws are mental health conditions don't. The statistic of suicidal Trans is the highest out of any demographic, and out of any event, or reason. Those numbers are above 70% of Trans have mental health conditions primarily are suicidal.

Not seizing firearms that landmark after having supposed firearms. It was on a police seizure. Obviously seizing gun rights are quite concerning affecting the right to own guns. Any diagnosis was a single medical opinion. How valid was it. The reaction seems overblown.

Regardless it is concerning how nobody else is authorised with guns to begin with if currently, they have the same mental conditions, the same Trans have. Read their own response. Their words. Yet there they are branishing them psychotically. Further they are being paraded as a sane and responsible choice, when anybody else with the same mental health conditions aren't paraded. In fact they're excluded from most roles of public service if they have those mental health conditions.

My suggestion of a Supreme Court Judgement is on their Status.

Because it is absurd. Irrationally illogical. There is a demographic of people where the medicine they take has clear warning labels on it. The health and mental conditions the majority have aren't by the same current laws fit to own guns. It is incredibly alarming they're paraded to children when they're an even bigger danger to themselves and others.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Yes, but it's whether somebody diagnosed with mental health conditions, read their response to the shooting, it has outlined why Trans shouldn't own guns, has a right to firearms to begin with.

The same current laws are mental health conditions don't. The statistic of suicidal Trans is the highest out of any demographic, and out of any event, or reason. Those numbers are above 70% of Trans have mental health conditions primarily are suicidal.

Not seizing firearms that landmark after having supposed firearms. It was on a police seizure. Obviously seizing gun rights are quite concerning affecting the right to own guns. Any diagnosis was a single medical opinion. How valid was it. The reaction seems overblown.

Regardless it is concerning how nobody else is authorised with guns to begin with if currently if they have the same mental conditions Trans have. Their words. Yet there they are branishing them psychotically. Further they are being paraded as a sane and responsible choice, when anybody else with the same mental health conditions aren't. In fact they're excluded from most roles of public service if they have those mental health conditions.

My suggestion of a Supreme Court Judgement is on their Status.

Because it is absurd. Irrationally illogical. There is a demographic of people where the medicine they take has clear warning labels on it. The health and mental conditions the majority have aren't by the same current laws fit to own guns. It is incredibly alarming they're paraded to children when they're an even bigger danger to themselves and others.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Yes, but it's whether somebody diagnosed with mental health conditions, read their response to the shooting, it has outlined why Trans shouldn't own guns, has a right to firearms to begin with.

The same current laws are mental health conditions don't. The statistic of suicidal Trans is the highest out of any demographic, and out of any event, or reason. Those numbers are above 70% of Trans have mental health conditions primarily are suicidal.

Not seizing firearms that landmark after having supposed firearms. It was on a police seizure. Obviously seizing gun rights are quite concerning affecting the right to own guns. Any diagnosis was a single medical opinion. How valid was it. The reaction seems overblown.

Regardless it is concerning how nobody else is authorised with guns to begin with if currently if they have the same mental conditions Trans have. Their words. Yet there they are branishing them psychotically. Further they are being paraded as a sane and responsible choice, when anybody else with the same mental health conditions aren't. In fact they're excluded from most roles of public service if they have those mental health conditions.

1 year ago
1 score