Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Not necessarily at all. War could be coming perhaps. Not enough to measure it from Starlink.

Starlink who uses remote access? Sat phones or uplinks in Antarctica, a desert, the jungle, a mountain, or needs that connection and away from local providers and coverage?

Look at that list? No wonder it was immediately contracted to the Ukraine. First major contract and it's the military. Why was that? Because it was already, right, to the USA military and perhaps its other Allies?

War incoming, perhaps, let me know when they capture something else, non military funded.

A bigger Mandela effect is all the crappy sources flipping out because Russia is stationing nukes in Belarus. This has been a source of crap over the last few days. Somehow this already happened last year. At the start of the conflict they were stationed in Kaliningrad and Belarus had the S400-500. But if memory serves Belarus already hosted Russian nukes, it has always hosted Russian nukes? Does anybody remember this. How many times last year deployment was announced or even threatened. Last week nothing but nonsense repeating what was already possibly there for much longer? Nuclear Bombers were there? Kaliningrad definitely had the latest arsenal. Belarus the S400-500. Didn't it also have nukes?

Yawn. I swear. Nothing but repetition today.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not necessarily at all. War could be coming perhaps. Not enough to measure it from Starlink.

Starlink who uses remote access? Sat phones or uplinks in Antarctica, a desert, the jungle, a mountain, or needs that connection and away from local providers and coverage?

Look at that list? No wonder it was immediately contracted to the Ukraine. First major contract and it's the military. Why was that? Because it was already, right, to the USA military and perhaps its other Allies?

War incoming, perhaps, let me know when they capture something else, non military funded.

A bigger Mandela effect is all the crappy sources flipping out because Russia is stationing nukes in Belarus. This has been a source of crap over the last few days. Somehow this already happened last year. At the start of the conflict they were stationed in Kaliningrad and Belarus had the S400-500. But if memory serves Belarus already hosted Russian nukes? Does anybody remember this. How many times last year deployment was announced or even threatened. Last week nothing but nonsense repeating what was already possibly there for much longer? Nuclear Bombers were there? Kaliningrad definitely had the latest arsenal. Belarus the S400-500. Didn't it also have nukes?

Yawn. I swear. Nothing but repetition today.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not necessarily at all. War could be coming perhaps. Not enough to measure it from Starlink.

Starlink who uses remote access? Sat phones or uplinks in Antarctica, a desert, the jungle, a mountain, or needs that connection and away from local providers and coverage?

Look at that list? No wonder it was immediately contracted to the Ukraine. First major contract and it's the military. Why was that? Because it was already, right, to the USA military and perhaps its other Allies?

War incoming, perhaps, let me know when they capture something else, non military funded.

A bigger Mandela effect is all the crappy sources flipping out because Russia is stationing nukes in Belarus. This has been a source of crap over the last few days. Somehow this already happened last year. At the start of the conflict they were stationed in Kalingrad and Belarus had the S400-500. But if memory serves Belarus already hosted Russian nukes? Does anybody remember this. How many times last year deployment was announced or even threatened. Last week nothing but nonsense repeating what was already possibly there for much longer? Nuclear Bombers were there? Kaliningrad definitely had the latest arsenal. Belarus the S400-500. Didn't it also have nukes?

Yawn. I swear. Nothing but repetition today.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not necessarily at all. War could be coming perhaps. Not enough to measure it from Starlink.

Starlink who uses remote access? Sat phones or uplinks in Antarctica, a desert, the jungle, a mountain, or needs that connection and away from local providers and coverage?

Look at that list? No wonder it was immediately contracted to the Ukraine. First major contract and it's the military. Why was that? Because it was already, right, to the USA military and perhaps its other Allies?

War incoming, perhaps, let me know when they capture something else, non military funded.

A bigger Mandela effect is all the crappy sources flipping out because Russia is stationing nukes in Belarus. This has been a source of crap over the last few days. Somehow this already happened last year. At the start of the conflict they were stationed in Kalingrad and Belarus had the S400-500. But if memory serves Belarus already hosted Russian nukes? Does anybody remember this. How many times last year deployment was announced or even threatened. Last week nothing but nonsense repeating what was already possibly there for much longer? Nuclear Bombers were there? Kaliningrad definitely had the latest Arsenal. Belarus the S400-500. Didn't it also have nukes?

Yawn. I swear. Nothing but repetition today.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Not necessarily at all. War could be coming perhaps. Not enough to measure it from Starlink.

Starlink who uses remote access? Sat phones or uplinks in Antarctica, a desert, the jungle, a mountain, or needs that connection and away from local providers and coverage?

Look at that list? No wonder it was immediately contracted to the Ukraine. First major contract and it's the military. Why was that? Because it was already, right, to the USA military and perhaps its other Allies?

War incoming, perhaps, let me know when they capture something else, non military funded.

1 year ago
1 score