Word
Thank you for your considerations. I find them all to be true-isms with reservations, and you impress with your Herculean forays into the subject.
If you'd allow me to digress in the name of progression.
If I'm accused of being anti-semite, I would say, 'Bring me this Semite'.
And I might be seen as anti-semantic if I say, 'Show me this 'will'.'
Is there a middle? A tourus vector? :)
The Will as ego projection is what most discuss when the subject is breached.
You seem to critique this. As do I.
You have meditated on the subject and find it a selective point out of the all. (map of the terrain - kek)
I offered the Map/Terrain deposition as introduction to another.
'If the map is not the terrain, then what 'is' the terrain? And what the answer gives us. Or what it does not give us is the answer in words. Here we arrive at the is/is not dichotomy and every other dichotomy involved with words. Words themselves are divisions of the all and are a 'left-brained' way of interpreting as map of the terrain.
The old philosphical chestnuts 'To do is to be' and 'To be is to do' has no mention of the word 'will' as in 'Do what thou wilt'.
In religion, the ego will is sublimated until the symbolic angel/angle is 'seen' or 'wrestled with' and defeated, so to say in words.
The exaltant religions give 'free will' as they enslave their passions to repeat.
All function has 'need' as it's source and what we call will is the attractive or repulsive force.
Ego sublimated creates a neutrality of 'will' to the point that it's moot.
That place where some attempt to arrive through dissection of words. Yet we use words, don't we? Renting and sewing. Sew I took up needle and thread also and can discern your pattern. So to speak.
We're fish exchanging spittle on dry land, says the Sufi. We're slapped as we discuss the difference between the flag, the wind, the wave, the mind.....
This can become it's own labyrinth until certain clew is found and the actual work done after realization. Realization is the first step as AA would say.
As a former and current wordaholic, I try to avoid them until I meet an old friend and then we'll reminisce.
Always a clew in the thread, a minotaur in a labyrinth and devil in the details.
But God is All that +1 one discovers with it's part (Q/17/Divine inspiration)
And now it's time to sail back home.
Updooted ya. Thanks for the journey and bon voyage.
A good host offers a gift for your safe return.
Word
Thank you for your considerations. I find them all to be true-isms with reservations, and you impress with your Herculean forays into the subject.
If you'd allow me to digress in the name of progression.
If I'm accused of being anti-semite, I would say, 'Bring me this Semite'.
And I might be accuses of being anti-semantic if I say, 'Show me this 'will'.'
Is there a middle? A tourus vector? :)
The Will as ego projection is what most discuss when the subject is breached.
You seem to critique this. As do I.
You have meditated on the subject and find it a selective point out of the all. (map of the terrain - kek)
I offered the Map/Terrain deposition as introduction to another.
'If the map is not the terrain, then what 'is' the terrain? And what the answer gives us. Or what it does not give us is the answer in words. Here we arrive at the is/is not dichotomy and every other dichotomy involved with words. Words themselves are divisions of the all and are a 'left-brained' way of interpreting as map of the terrain.
The old philosphical chestnuts 'To do is to be' and 'To be is to do' has no mention of the word 'will' as in 'Do what thou wilt'.
In religion, the ego will is sublimated until the symbolic angel/angle is 'seen' or 'wrestled with' and defeated, so to say in words.
The exaltant religions give 'free will' as they enslave their passions to repeat.
All function has 'need' as it's source and what we call will is the attractive or repulsive force.
Ego sublimated creates a neutrality of 'will' to the point that it's moot.
That place where some attempt to arrive through dissection of words. Yet we use words, don't we? Renting and sewing. Sew I took up needle and thread also and can discern your pattern. So to speak.
We're fish exchanging spittle on dry land, says the Sufi. We're slapped as we discuss the difference between the flag, the wind, the wave, the mind.....
This can become it's own labyrinth until certain clew is found and the actual work done after realization. Realization is the first step as AA would say.
As a former and current wordaholic, I try to avoid them until I meet an old friend and then we'll reminisce.
Always a clew in the thread, a minotaur in a labyrinth and devil in the details.
But God is All that +1 one discovers with it's part (Q/17/Divine inspiration)
And now it's time to sail back home.
Updooted ya. Thanks for the journey and bon voyage.
A good host offers a gift for your safe return.
Word
Thank you for your considerations. I find them all to be true-isms with reservations, and you impress with your Herculean forays into the subject.
If you'd allow me to digress in the name of progression.
If I'm accused of being anti-semite, I would say, 'Bring me this Semite'.
And I might be accuses of being anti-semantic if I say, 'Show me this 'will'.'
Is there a middle? A tourus vector? :)
The Will as ego projection is what most discuss when the subject is breached.
You seem to critique this. As do I.
You have meditated on the subject and find it a selective point out of the all. (map of the terrain - kek)
I offered the Map/Terrain deposition as introduction to another.
'If the map is not the terrain, then what 'is' the terrain? And what the answer gives us. Or what it does not give us is the answer in words. Here we arrive at the is/is not dichotomy and every other dichotomy involved with words. Words themselves are divisions of the all and are a 'left-brained' way of interpreting as map of the terrain.
The old philosphical chestnuts 'To do is to be' and 'To be is to do' has no mention of the word 'will' as in 'Do what thou wilt'.
In religion, the ego will is sublimated until the symbolic angel/angle is 'seen' or 'wrestled with' and defeated, so to say in words.
The exaltant religions give 'free will' as they enslave their passions to repeat.
All function has 'need' as it's source and what we call will is the attractive or repulsive force.
Ego sublimated creates a neutrality of 'will' to the point that it's moot.
That place where some attempt to arrive through dissection of words. Yet we use words, don't we? Renting and sewing. Sew I took up needle and thread also and can discern your pattern. So to speak.
We're fish exchanging spittle on dry land, says the Sufi. We're slapped as we discuss the difference between the flag, the wind, the wave, the mind.....
This can become it's own labyrinth until certain clew is found and the actual work done after realization. Realization is the first step as AA would say.
As a former and current wordaholic, I try to avoid them until I meet an old friend and then we'll reminisce.
Always a clew in the thread, a minotaur in a labyrinth and devil in the details.
But God is All that +1 one discovers with it's part (Q/17/Divine inspiration)
And now it's time to sail back home.
Updooted ya. Thanks for the journey and bon voyage.
A good host offers a gift for your safe return.
Word
Thank you for your considerations. I find them all to be true-isms with reservations. But that's my take on everything. :)
If I'm accused of being anti-semite, I would say, 'Bring me this Semite'.
So I'll be accuse of being anti-semantic if I say, 'Show me this 'will'.'
The truth is usually in the middle of that tourus vector.
The Will as ego projection is what most discuss when the subject is breached.
You seem to critique this. As do I.
You have meditated on the subject and find it a selective point out of the all. (map of the terrain - kek)
I offered the Map/Terrain deposition as introduction to another.
'If the map is not the terrain, then what 'is' the terrain? And what the answer gives us. Or what it does not give us is the answer in words. Here we arrive at the is/is not dichotomy and every other dichotomy involved with words. Words themselves are divisions of the all and are a 'left-brained' way of interpreting as map of the terrain.
The old philosphical chestnuts 'To do is to be' and 'To be is to do' has no mention of the word 'will' as in 'Do what thou wilt'.
In religion, the ego will is sublimated until the symbolic angel/angle is 'seen' or 'wrestled with' and defeated, so to say in words.
The exaltant religions give 'free will' as they enslave their passions to repeat.
All function has 'need' as it's source and what we call will is the attractive or repulsive force.
Ego sublimated creates a neutrality of 'will' to the point that it's moot.
That place where some attempt to arrive through dissection of words. Yet we use words, don't we? Renting and sewing. Sew I took up needle and thread also and can discern your pattern. So to speak.
We're fish exchanging spittle on dry land, says the Sufi. We're slapped as we discuss the difference between the flag, the wind, the wave, the mind.....
This can become it's own labyrinth until certain clew is found and the actual work done after realization. Realization is the first step as AA would say.
As a former and current wordaholic, I try to avoid them until I meet an old friend and then we'll reminisce.
Always a clew in the thread, a minotaur in a labyrinth and devil in the details.
But God is All that +1 one discovers with it's part (Q/17/Divine inspiration)
And now it's time to sail back home.
Updooted ya. Thanks for the journey and bon voyage.
A good host offers a gift for your safe return.
Word
Thank you for your considerations. I find them all to be true-isms with reservations. But that's my take on everything. :)
If I'm accused of being anti-semite, I would say, 'Bring me this Semite'.
So I'll be accuse of being anti-semantic if I say, 'Show me this 'will'.'
The truth is usually in the middle of that tourus vector.
The Will as ego projection is what most discuss when the subject is breached.
You seem to critique this. As do I.
You have meditated on the subject and find it a selective point out of the all. (map of the terrain - kek)
I offered the Map/Terrain deposition as introduction to another.
'If the map is not the terrain, then what 'is' the terrain? And what the answer gives us. Or what it does not give us is the answer in words. Here we arrive at the is/is not dichotomy and every other dichotomy involved with words. Words themselves are divisions of the all and are a 'left-brained' way of interpreting as map of the terrain.
The old philosphical chestnuts 'To do is to be' and 'To be is to do' has no mention of the word 'will' as in 'Do what thou wilt'.
In religion, the ego will is sublimated until the symbolic angel/angle is 'seen' or 'wrestled with' and defeated, so to say in words.
The exaltant religions give 'free will' as they enslave their passions to repeat.
All function has 'need' as it's source and what we call will is the attractive or repulsive force.
Ego sublimated creates a neutrality of 'will' to the point that it's moot.
That place where some attempt to arrive through dissection of words. Yet we use words, don't we? Renting and sewing. Sew I took up needle and thread also and can discern your pattern. So to speak.
We're fish exchanging spittle on dry land, says the Sufi. We're slapped as we discuss the difference between the flag, the wind, the wave, the mind.....
This can become it's own labyrinth until certain clew is found and the actual work done after realization. Realization is the first step as AA would say.
As a former and current wordaholic, I try to avoid them until I meet an old friend and then we'll reminisce.
Always a clew in the thread, a minotaur in a labyrinth and devil in the details.
But God is All that +1 on discovers with it's part (Q/17/Divine inspiration)
And now it's time to sail back home.
Updooted ya. Thanks for the journey and bon voyage.
A good host offers a gift for your safe return.