Because it occurred. But here's the thing. It made no difference. If Napoleon won it wouldn't have changed anything and France losing had already lost economical dominance. Their revolution empowering Napoleon. Trafalgar was far more important. It stopped the French navy. Destroyed prior to Waterloo. No invasion of England possible. Meanwhile Prussia beat Napoleon at Waterloo arrived late by calvary beating any advantage, Napoleon pressed. He might have won, if even the sky itself, eruption in Indonesia hadn't have even been against him. Where if he won both Prussia and Russia were there to kick him all over again.

The main thing it did was empower the banks Rothschild, who sooner got their hands all over it. And later, caused the fall of Empires in WW1.

Because it occurred. But here's the thing. It made no difference. If Napoleon won it wouldn't have changed anything and France losing had already lost economical dominance. Their revolution empowering Napoleon. Trafalgar was far more important. It stopped the French navy. Destroyed prior to Waterloo. No invasion of England possible. Meanwhile Prussia beat Napoleon at Waterloo arrived late by calvary beating any advantage, Napolean pressed. He might have won, if even the sky itself, eruption in Indonesia hadn't have even been against him. Where if he won both Prussia and Russia were there to kick him all over again.

The main thing it did was empower the banks Rothschild, who sooner got their hands all over it. And later, caused the fall of Empires in WW1.