I can't agree with much of what you said. I studied cell biology and other biology at a really good university for it. My cell biology bio lab course used electron microscopes, and we simply coated cells with a thin layer of gold and photographed that. The beam reflected from the gold and that was that. We got good images cleanly representing the cell. Sure, a 'naked' cell will get blasted if the beam is strong enough. These days, the E-Ms have advanced a lot and get images from weak beams. On the rest of the items, no, the ideas are incorrect. I am not attacking you with mean intent here but you have lots of mistaken wrong ideas. There is something wrong in Bailey's head, he twists things too much. [ well okay, you Dunning-Kroeger downvoters who never studied biology. I'm not going to waste my time posting links to counter where you are knowably wrong.]

I can't agree with much of what you said. I studied cell biology and other biology at a really good university for it. My cell biology bio lab course used electron microscopes, and we simply coated cells with a thin layer of gold and photographed that. The beam reflected from the gold and that was that. We got good images cleanly representing the cell. Sure, a 'naked' cell will get blasted if the beam is strong enough. These days, the E-Ms have advanced a lot and get images from weak beams. On the rest of the items, no, the ideas are incorrect. I am not attacking you with mean intent here but you have lots of mistaken wrong ideas. There is something wrong in Bailey's head, he twists things too much.