Yawn. You're missing the point of today's exercise.

Can war today be won conventionally? It hasn't effectively been since WW2. Sure they removed some despot but did they win? No but change occurred. Instead it forces collapse to bring change. Today's collapse is simply adopting another method.

War can still occur and runs far greater risk now. But it hasn't directly yet. Now why is that? Because it will later. It hasn't yet despite even more opportunities too. You're suggesting it still will. Instead of it simply causing change. Look at the change being forced?

War would be simpler. It would be easier. There aren't those kind of winners, haven't been for awhile. I agree it can still occur. But today it is being used to force agenda and cause control. It is causing collapse to adopt another means and method of control. It is quite profitable. You will buy more electricity, paying even more for bugs, but they aren't the irradiated cockroaches, not yet.

Or war already. 2 more weeks. Nope. But you're still paying more for it. Hahaha, and it will wipe all the debt out. No, debt is profitable. There's always more debt for you to pay more for, or they'll sell it to another investor anyway.

I'd laugh if it occurs because everywhere else decides to mass formation against their governments taxing them more, and the only way they stay in power is to go too war. Not happening. They'll get the next government in beforehand, and it will promise more debt. But the banks will continue to laugh all the same.

Yawn. You're missing the point of today's exercise.

Can war today be won conventionally? It hasn't effectively been since WW2. Sure they removed some despot but did they win? No but change occurred. Instead it forces collapse to bring change. Today's collapse is simply adopting another method.

War can still occur and runs far greater risk now. But it hasn't directly yet. Now why is that? Because it will later. It hasn't yet despite even more opportunities too. You're suggesting it still will. Instead of it simply causing change. Look at the change being forced?

War would be simpler. It would be easier. There aren't those kind of winners, haven't been for awhile. I agree it can still occur. But today it is being used to force agenda and cause control. It is causing collapse to adopt another means and method of control. It is quite profitable. You will buy more electricity, paying even more for bugs, but they aren't the irradiated cockroaches, not yet.

Or war already. 2 more weeks. Nope. But you're still paying more it. Hahaha, and it will wipe all the debt out. No, debt is profitable. There's always more debt for you to pay more for, or they'll sell it to another investor anyway.

I'd laugh if it occurs because everywhere else decides to mass formation against their governments taxing them more and the only way they stay in power is to go too war. Not happening. They'll get the next government in beforehand, and it will promise more debt. The banks laugh all the same.

Yawn. You're missing the point of today's exercise.

Can war today be won conventionally? It hasn't effectively been since WW2. Sure they removed some despot but did they win? No but change occurred. Instead it forces collapse to bring change. Today's collapse is simply adopting another method.

War can still occur and runs far greater risk now. But it hasn't directly yet. Now why is that? Because it will later. It hasn't yet despite even more opportunities too. You're suggesting it still will. Instead of it simply causing change. Look at the change being forced?

War would be simpler. It would be easier. There aren't those kind of winners, haven't been for awhile. I agree it can still occur. But today it is being used to force agenda and cause control. It is causing collapse to adopt another means and method of control. It is quite profitable. You will buy more electricity, paying even more for bugs, but they aren't the irradiated cockroaches, not yet.

Or war already. 2 more weeks. Nope. But you're still paying more it. Hahaha, and it will wipe all the debt out. No, debt is profitable. There's always more debt for you to pay more for, or they'll sell it to another investor anyway.

I'd laugh if it occurs because everywhere else decides to mass formation against their governments taxing them more.and the only way they stay in power is to go too war. Not happening. They'll get the next government in beforehand, and it will promise more debt.

Yawn. You're missing the point of today's exercise.

Can war today be won conventionally? It hasn't effectively been since WW2. Sure they removed some despot but did they win? No but change occurred. Instead it forces collapse to bring change. Today's collapse is simply adopting another method.

War can still occur and runs far greater risk now. But it hasn't directly yet. Now why is that? Because it will later. It hasn't yet despite even more opportunities too. You're suggesting it still will. Instead of it simply causing change. Look at the change being forced?

War would be simpler. It would be easier. There aren't those kind of winners, haven't been for awhile. I agree it can still occur. But today it is being used to force agenda and cause control. It is causing collapse to adopt another means and method of control. It is quite profitable. You will buy more electricity, paying even more for bugs, but they aren't the irradiated cockroaches, not yet.

Yawn. You're missing the point of today's exercise.

Can war today be won conventionally? It hasn't effectively been since WW2. Sure they removed some despot but did they win? Instead it forces collapse to bring change. Today's collapse is simply adopting another method.

War can still occur and runs far greater risk. But it hasn't directly yet. Now why is that?