can't figure why

i believe the simple answer is that electricity is the "lowest common denominator", so to speak:

• oil can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• coal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• solar can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• tidal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• geothermal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• nuclear can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• even Ford F150's can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• etc. etc. etc.

• once the industries shift all the motors to electric, they won't need to "switch again" at some later date down the road -- because no matter the fuel source, electricity can always be generated to power the engines.

• from an industry infrastructure / human civilization stability perspective, it's pretty smart / logical to move to electric motors, from my perspective.

the conspiracy:

• so called "free energy" exists (unlimited energy source, zero point, etc.), and TPTB won't touch it with a 10 foot pole because... meh ... all kinds of reasons including... can you imagine giving "unlimited energy" to osama bin laden™ (stereotypical terrorist) ?

• my only issue with electric is that TPTB want to use this "shift to electric" as an opportunity to further centralize energy production / distribution -- e.g., as Elon suggested: ONE (1) giant solar field in the middle of the desert to power the entire nation - represents a single point of failure #stupid.

• but i DO like solar (not ideally) -- for the reason it CAN be distributed (per rooftop) -- it's not about being "green" (whatever the fuck that means) -- more fundamentally, it's about the stability of civilization.

can't figure why

i believe the simple answer is that electricity is the "lowest common denominator", so to speak:

• oil can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• coal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• solar can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• tidal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• geothermal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• nuclear can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• even Ford F150's can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• etc. etc. etc.

• once the industries shift all the motors to electric, they won't need to "switch again" at some later date down the road -- because no matter the fuel source is at the moment, electricity may always be used to power the engines.

• from an industry infrastructure / human civilization stability perspective, it's pretty smart / logical to move to electric motors, from my perspective.

the conspiracy:

• so called "free energy" exists (unlimited energy source, zero point, etc.), and TPTB won't touch it with a 10 foot pole because... meh ... all kinds of reasons including... can you imagine giving "unlimited energy" to osama bin laden™ (stereotypical terrorist) ?

• my only issue with electric is that TPTB want to use this "shift to electric" as an opportunity to further centralize energy production / distribution -- e.g., as Elon suggested: ONE (1) giant solar field in the middle of the desert to power the entire nation - represents a single point of failure #stupid.

• but i DO like solar (not ideally) -- for the reason it CAN be distributed (per rooftop) -- it's not about being "green" (whatever the fuck that means) -- more fundamentally, it's about the stability of civilization.

can't figure why

i believe the simple answer is that electricity is the "lowest common denominator", so to speak:

• hydrogen can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• oil can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• coal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• solar can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• tidal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• geothermal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• nuclear can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• even Ford F150's can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• etc. etc. etc.

• once the industries shift all the motors to electric, they won't need to "switch again" at some later date down the road -- because no matter the fuel source is at the moment, electricity may always be used to power the engines.

• from an industry infrastructure / human civilization stability perspective, it's pretty smart / logical to move to electric motors, from my perspective.

the conspiracy:

• so called "free energy" exists (unlimited energy source, zero point, etc.), and TPTB won't touch it with a 10 foot pole because... meh ... all kinds of reasons including... can you imagine giving "unlimited energy" to osama bin laden™ (stereotypical terrorist) ?

• my only issue with electric is that TPTB want to use this "shift to electric" as an opportunity to further centralize energy production / distribution -- e.g., as Elon suggested: ONE (1) giant solar field in the middle of the desert to power the entire nation - represents a single point of failure #stupid.

• but i DO like solar (not ideally) -- for the reason it CAN be distributed (per rooftop) -- it's not about being "green" (whatever the fuck that means) -- more fundamentally, it's about the stability of civilization.

can't figure why

i believe the simple answer is that electricity is the "lowest common denominator", so to speak:

• oil can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• coal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• solar can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• tidal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• geothermal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• nuclear can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• even Ford F150's can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• etc. etc. etc.

• once the industries shift all the motors to electric, they won't need to "switch again" at some later date down the road -- because no matter the fuel source is at the moment, electricity may always be used to power the engines.

• from an industry infrastructure / human civilization stability perspective, it's pretty smart / logical to move to electric motors, from my perspective.

the conspiracy:

• so called "free energy" exists (unlimited energy source, zero point, etc.), and TPTB won't touch it with a 10 foot pole because... meh ... all kinds of reasons including... can you imagine giving "unlimited energy" to osama bin laden™ (stereotypical terrorist) ?

• my only issue with electric is that TPTB want to use this "shift to electric" as an opportunity to further centralize energy production / distribution -- e.g., as Elon suggested: ONE (1) giant solar field in the middle of the desert to power the entire nation - represents a single point of failure #stupid.

• but i DO like solar (not ideally) -- for the reason it CAN be distributed (per rooftop) -- it's not about being "green" (whatever the fuck that means) -- more fundamentally, it's about the stability of civilization.

can't figure why

i believe the simple answer is that electricity is the "lowest common denominator", so to speak:

• oil can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• coal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• solar can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• tidal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• geothermal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• nuclear can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• even Ford F150's can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• etc. etc. etc.

• once the industries shift all the motors to electric, they won't need to "switch again" at some later date down the road -- because no matter the fuel source is at the moment, electricity may always be used to power the engines.

• from an industry infrastructure / human civilization stability perspective, it's pretty smart / logical to move to electric motors, from my perspective.

the conspiracy:

• so called "free energy" exists (unlimited energy source, zero point, etc.), and TPTB won't touch it with a 10 foot pole because... meh ... all kinds of reasons including... can you imagine giving "unlimited energy" to osama bin laden™ (stereotypical terrorist) ?

• my only issue with electric is that TPTB want to use this "shift to electric" as an opportunity to further centralize energy production / distribution -- e.g., as Elon suggested: ONE (1) giant solar field in the middle of the desert to power the entire nation - represents a single point of failure #stupid.

• but i DO like solar (kinda) -- for the reason it CAN be distributed (per rooftop) -- it's not about being "green" (whatever the fuck that means) -- more fundamentally, it's about the stability of civilization.

can't figure why

i believe the simple answer is that electricity is the "lowest common denominator", so to speak:

• oil can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• coal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• solar can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• tidal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• geothermal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• nuclear can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• even Ford F150's can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• etc. etc. etc.

• once the industries shift all the motors to electric, they won't need to "switch again" at some later date down the road -- because no matter the fuel source is at the moment, electricity may always be used to power the engines.

• from an industry infrastructure / human civilization stability perspective, it's pretty smart / logical to move to electric motors, from my perspective.

the conspiracy:

so called "free energy" exists (unlimited energy source, zero point, etc.), and TPTB won't touch it with a 10 foot pole because... meh ... all kinds of reasons including... can you imagine giving "unlimited energy" to osama bin laden™ (stereotypical terrorist) ?

my only issue with electric is that TPTB want to use this "shift to electric" as an opportunity to further centralize energy production / distribution -- e.g., as Elon suggested: ONE (1) giant solar field in the middle of the desert to power the entire nation - represents a single point of failure #stupid.

but i DO like solar (kinda) -- for the reason it CAN be distributed (per rooftop) -- it's not about being "green" (whatever the fuck that means) -- more fundamentally, it's about the stability of civilization.

can't figure why

i believe the simple answer is that electricity is the "lowest common denominator", so to speak:

• oil can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• coal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• solar can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• tidal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• geothermal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• nuclear can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• even Ford F150's can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• etc. etc. etc.

• once the industries shift all the motors to electric, they won't need to "switch again" at some later date down the road -- because no matter the fuel source is at the moment, electricity may always be used to power the engines.

• from an industry infrastructure / human civilization stability perspective, it's pretty smart / logical to move to electric motors, from my perspective.

the conspiracy:

so called "free energy" exists (unlimited energy source, zero point, etc.), and TPTB won't touch it with a 10 foot pole because... meh ... all kinds of reasons including... can you imagine giving "unlimited energy" to osama bin laden™ (stereotypical terrorist) ?

my only issue with electric is that TPTB want to use this shift as an opportunity to further centralize energy production / distribution -- e.g., as Elon suggested: ONE (1) giant solar field in the middle of the desert to power the entire nation - represents a single point of failure #stupid.

but i DO like solar (kinda) -- for the reason it CAN be distributed (per rooftop) -- it's not about being "green" (whatever the fuck that means) -- more fundamentally, it's about the stability of civilization.

can't figure why

i believe the simple answer is that electricity is the "lowest common denominator", so to speak:

• oil can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• coal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• solar can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• tidal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• geothermal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• nuclear can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• even Ford F150's can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• etc. etc. etc.

• once the industries shift all the motors to electric, they won't need to "switch again" at some later date down the road -- because no matter the fuel source is at the moment, electricity may always be used to power the engines.

• from an industry infrastructure / human civilization stability perspective, it's pretty smart / logical to move to electric motors.

the conspiracy:

so called "free energy" exists (unlimited energy source, zero point, etc.), and TPTB won't touch it with a 10 foot pole because... meh ... all kinds of reasons including... can you imagine giving "unlimited energy" to osama bin laden™ (stereotypical terrorist) ?

my only issue with electric is that TPTB want to use this shift as an opportunity to further centralize energy production / distribution -- e.g., as Elon suggested: ONE (1) giant solar field in the middle of the desert to power the entire nation - represents a single point of failure #stupid.

but i DO like solar (kinda) -- for the reason it CAN be distributed (per rooftop) -- it's not about being "green" (whatever the fuck that means) -- more fundamentally, it's about the stability of civilization.

can't figure why

i believe the simple answer is that electricity is the "lowest common denominator", so to speak:

• oil can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• coal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• solar can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• tidal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• geothermal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• nuclear can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• even Ford F150's can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• etc. etc. etc.

i.e., once the industries shift all the motors to electric, they won't need to "switch again" at some later date down the road -- because no matter the fuel source is at the moment, electricity may always be used to power the engines.

i.e., from an industry infrastructure / human civilization stability perspective, it's pretty smart / logical to move to electric motors.

the conspiracy:

so called "free energy" exists (unlimited energy source, zero point, etc.), and TPTB won't touch it with a 10 foot pole because... meh ... all kinds of reasons including... can you imagine giving "unlimited energy" to osama bin laden™ (stereotypical terrorist) ?

my only issue with electric is that TPTB want to use this shift as an opportunity to further centralize energy production / distribution -- e.g., as Elon suggested: ONE (1) giant solar field in the middle of the desert to power the entire nation - represents a single point of failure #stupid.

but i DO like solar (kinda) -- for the reason it CAN be distributed (per rooftop) -- it's not about being "green" (whatever the fuck that means) -- more fundamentally, it's about the stability of civilization.

can't figure why

i believe the simple answer is that electricity is the "lowest common denominator", so to speak:

• oil can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• coal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• solar can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• tidal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• geothermal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• nuclear can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• even Ford F150's can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• etc. etc. etc.

i.e., once the industries shift all the motors to electric, they won't need to "switch again" at some later date down the road -- because no matter the fuel source is at the moment, electricity may always be used to power the engines.

i.e., from an industry infrastructure / human civilization stability perspective, it's pretty smart / logical to move to electric motors.

the conspiracy:

so called "free energy" exists (unlimited energy source, zero point, etc.), and TPTB won't touch it with a 10 foot pole because... meh ... all kinds of reasons including... can you imagine giving "unlimited energy" to osama bin laden™ (stereotypical terrorist) ?

my only issue with electric is that TPTB want to use this shift as an opportunity to further centralize energy production / distribution -- e.g., as Elon suggested: ONE (1) giant solar field in the middle of the desert to power the entire nation - represents a single point of failure #stupid.

but i DO like solar (kinda) -- for the reason it CAN be distributed (per rooftop) -- it's not about being "green" -- it's about the stability of civilization.

can't figure why

i believe the simple answer is that electricity is the "lowest common denominator", so to speak:

• oil can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• coal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• solar can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• tidal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• geothermal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• nuclear can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• even Ford F150's can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• etc. etc. etc.

i.e., once the industries shift all the motors to electric, they won't need to "switch again" at some later date down the road -- because no matter the fuel source is at the moment, electricity may always be used to power the engines.

i.e., from an industry infrastructure / human civilization stability perspective, it's pretty smart / logical to move to electric motors.

the conspiracy:

so called "free energy" exists (unlimited energy source, zero point, etc.), and TPTB won't touch it with a 10 foot pole because... meh ... all kinds of reasons including... can you imagine giving "unlimited energy" to osama bin laden™ (stereotypical terrorist) ?

my only issue with electric is that TPTB want to use this shift as an opportunity to further centralize energy production / distribution -- e.g., as Elon suggested: ONE (1) giant solar field in the middle of the desert to power the entire nation - represents a single point of failure #stupid.

but i DO like solar (kinda) -- for the reason it CAN be distributed (per rooftop) -- it's not about being "green".

can't figure why

i believe the simple answer is that electricity is the "lowest common denominator", so to speak:

• oil can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• coal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• solar can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• tidal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• geothermal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• nuclear can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• even Ford F150's can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• etc. etc. etc.

i.e., once the industries shift all the motors to electric, they won't need to "switch again" at some later date down the road -- because no matter the fuel source is at the moment, electricity may always be used to power the engines.

i.e., from an industry infrastructure / human civilization stability perspective, it's pretty smart / logical to move to electric motors.

the conspiracy:

so called "free energy" exists (unlimited energy source, zero point, etc.), and TPTB won't touch it with a 10 foot pole because... meh ... all kinds of reasons including... can you imagine giving "unlimited energy" to osama bin laden™ (stereotypical terrorist) ?

my only issue with electric is that TPTB want to use this shift as an opportunity to further centralize energy production / distribution -- e.g., as Elon suggested: ONE (1) giant solar field in the middle of the desert to power the entire nation - represents a single point of failure #stupid.

but that's why i DO like solar (kinda). it's not about "green". it's about distributed power production.

can't figure why

i believe the simple answer is that electricity is the "lowest common denominator", so to speak:

• oil can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• coal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• solar can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• tidal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• geothermal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• nuclear can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• even Ford F150's can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• etc. etc. etc.

i.e., once the industries shift all the motors to electric, they won't need to "switch again" at some later date down the road -- because no matter the fuel source is at the moment, electricity may always be used to power the engines.

i.e., from an industry infrastructure / human civilization stability perspective, it's pretty smart / logical to move to electric motors.

the conspiracy:

so called "free energy" exists (unlimited energy source, zero point, etc.), and TPTB won't touch it with a 10 foot pole because... meh ... all kinds of reasons including... can you imagine giving "unlimited energy" to osama bin laden™ (stereotypical terrorist) ?

my only issue with electric is that TPTB want to use this shift an opportunity to further centralize energy production / distribution -- e.g., as Elon suggested: ONE (1) giant solar field in the middle of the desert to power the entire nation - represents a single point of failure #stupid.

but that's why i DO like solar (kinda). it's not about "green". it's about distributed power production.

can't figure why

i believe the simple answer is that electricity is the "lowest common denominator", so to speak:

• oil can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• coal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• solar can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• tidal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• geothermal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• nuclear can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• even Ford F150's can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• etc. etc. etc.

i.e., once the industries shift all the motors to electric, they won't need to "switch again" at some later date down the road -- because no matter the fuel source is at the moment, electricity may always be used to power the engines.

i.e., from an industry infrastructure / human civilization stability perspective, it's a logical move.

the conspiracy:

so called "free energy" exists (unlimited energy source, zero point, etc.), and TPTB won't touch it with a 10 foot pole because... meh ... all kinds of reasons including... can you imagine giving "unlimited energy" to osama bin laden™ (stereotypical terrorist) ?

my only issue with electric is that TPTB want to use this shift an opportunity to further centralize energy production / distribution -- e.g., as Elon suggested: ONE (1) giant solar field in the middle of the desert to power the entire nation - represents a single point of failure #stupid.

but that's why i DO like solar (kinda). it's not about "green". it's about distributed power production.

can't figure why

i believe the simple answer is that electricity is the "lowest common denominator", so to speak:

• oil can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• coal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• solar can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• tidal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• geothermal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• nuclear can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• even Ford F150's can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• etc. etc. etc.

i.e., once the industries shift all the motors to electric, they won't need to "switch again" at some later date down the road -- because no matter the fuel source is at the moment, electricity may always be used to power the engines.

i.e., from an industry infrastructure / human civilization stability perspective, it's a logical move.

the conspiracy:

so called "free energy" exists (unlimited energy source, zero point, etc.), and TPTB won't touch it with a 10 foot pole because... meh ... all kinds of reasons including... can you imagine giving "unlimited energy" to osama bin laden™ (stereotypical terrorist) ?

my only issue with electric is that TPTB want to use this shift an opportunity to further centralize energy production / distribution -- e.g., as Elon suggested: ONE (1) giant solar field in the middle of the desert to power the entire nation - represents a single point of failure #stupid.

that's why i like solar (kinda). it's not about "green". it's about distributed power production.

can't figure why

i believe the simple answer is that electricity is the "lowest common denominator", so to speak:

• oil can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• coal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• solar can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• tidal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• geothermal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• nuclear can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• even Ford F150's can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• etc. etc. etc.

i.e., once the industries shift all the motors to electric, they won't need to "switch again" at some later date down the road -- because no matter the fuel source is at the moment, electricity may always be used to power the engines.

i.e., from an industry infrastructure / human civilization stability perspective, it's a logical move.

the conspiracy:

so called "free energy" exists (unlimited energy source, zero point, etc.), and TPTB won't touch it with a 10 foot pole because... meh ... all kinds of reasons including... can you imagine giving "unlimited energy" to osama bin laden™ (stereotypical terrorist) ?

my only issue with electric is that TPTB want to use this shift an opportunity to further centralize energy production / distribution (e.g., as Elon suggested: ONE (1) giant solar field in the middle of the desert to power the entire nation - represents a single point of failure #stupid)

that's why i like solar (kinda). it's not about "green". it's about distributed power production.

can't figure why

i believe the simple answer is that electricity is the "lowest common denominator", so to speak:

• oil can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• coal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• solar can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• tidal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• geothermal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• nuclear can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• even Ford F150's can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• etc. etc. etc.

i.e., once the industries shift all the motors to electric, they won't need to "switch again" at some later date down the road -- because no matter the fuel source is at the moment, electricity may always be used to power the engines.

i.e., from an industry infrastructure / human civilization stability perspective, it's a logical move.

the conspiracy:

so called "free energy" exists (unlimited energy source, zero point, etc.), and TPTB won't touch it with a 10 foot pole because... meh ... all kinds of reasons including... can you imagine giving "unlimited energy" to osama bin laden™ (stereotypical terrorist) ?

my only issue with electric is that TPTB want to use this shift an opportunity to further centralize energy production / distribution (e.g., as Elon suggested: ONE (1) giant solar field in the middle of the desert to power the entire nation - represents a single point of failure #stupid)

that's why i ~like solar. it's not about "green". it's about distributed power production.

can't figure why

i believe the simple answer is that electricity is the "lowest common denominator", so to speak:

• oil can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• coal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• solar can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• tidal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• geothermal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• nuclear can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• even Ford F150's can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• etc. etc. etc.

i.e., once the industries shift all the motors to electric, they won't need to "switch again" at some later date down the road -- because no matter the fuel source is at the moment, electricity may always be used to power the engines.

i.e., from an industry infrastructure / human civilization stability perspective, it's a logical move.

the conspiracy:

so called "free energy" exists (unlimited energy source, zero point, etc.), and TPTB won't touch it with a 10 foot pole because... meh ... all kinds of reasons including... can you imagine giving "unlimited energy" to osama bin laden™ (stereotypical terrorist) ?

can't figure why

i believe the simple answer is that electricity is the "lowest common denominator", so to speak:

• oil can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• coal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• solar can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• tidal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• geothermal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• nuclear can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• even Ford F150's can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• etc. etc. etc.

i.e., once the industries shift all the motors to electric, they won't need to "switch again" at some later date down the road -- because no matter the fuel source is at the moment, electricity may always be used to power the engines.

i.e., from an industry infrastructure perspective, it's a logical move.

the conspiracy:

so called "free energy" exists (unlimited energy source, zero point, etc.), and TPTB won't touch it with a 10 foot pole because... meh ... all kinds of reasons including... can you imagine giving "unlimited energy" to osama bin laden™ (stereotypical terrorist) ?

can't figure why

i believe the simple answer is that electricity is the "lowest common denominator" - so to speak:

• oil can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• coal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• solar can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• tidal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• geothermal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• nuclear can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• even Ford F150's can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• etc. etc. etc.

i.e., once the industries shift all the motors to electric, they won't need to "switch again" at some later date down the road -- because no matter the fuel source is at the moment, electricity may always be used to power the engines.

i.e., from an industry infrastructure perspective, it's a logical move.

the conspiracy:

so called "free energy" exists (unlimited energy source, zero point, etc.), and TPTB won't touch it with a 10 foot pole because... meh ... all kinds of reasons including... can you imagine giving "unlimited energy" to osama bin laden™ (stereotypical terrorist) ?

can't figure why

i believe the simple answer is that electricity is the lowest common denominator:

• oil can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• coal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• solar can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• tidal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• geothermal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• nuclear can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• even Ford F150's can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• etc. etc. etc.

i.e., once the industries shift all the motors to electric, they won't need to "switch again" at some later date down the road -- because no matter the fuel source is at the moment, electricity may always be used to power the engines.

i.e., from an industry infrastructure perspective, it's a logical move.

the conspiracy:

so called "free energy" exists (unlimited energy source, zero point, etc.), and TPTB won't touch it with a 10 foot pole because... meh ... all kinds of reasons including... can you imagine giving "unlimited energy" to osama bin laden™ (stereotypical terrorist) ?

can't figure why

i believe the simple answer is that electricity is the lowest common denominator:

• oil can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• coal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• solar can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• tidal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• geothermal can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• nuclear can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• even Ford F150's can produce electricity - and not the other way around;

• etc. etc. etc.

i.e., once the industries shift all the motors to electric, they won't need to "switch again" at some later date down the road -- because no matter the original fuel source, electricity may always be used to power the engine.

i.e., from an industry infrastructure perspective, it's a logical move.

the conspiracy:

so called "free energy" exists (unlimited energy source, zero point, etc.), and TPTB won't touch it with a 10 foot pole because... meh ... all kinds of reasons including... can you imagine giving "unlimited energy" to osama bin laden™ (stereotypical terrorist) ?