These people are the worst that have ever existed in history. They are contrary to every democratic law and principle. They are not our elected choice. The key word choice. Information isn't there's to usurp. It is our choice in what we deem to be informative. It shouldn't be restricted because it undermines them, or any other challenges to what they're promoting. At what point did the Internet become Tyranny, the day they assumed control over it.

Until today it had done society no favours at all. Look at the cost. Still they insist on restricting it. Because that has worked. No. Not one single solution using the Internet more has worked better. Not even email. Seriously mail was often far more secure. Argues it improved times. At what cost to society, how much more crap does it take to get your mail, secure, laughs, hell no. It bombarded you with worsening services. Look at them now. Connected. Haha society was before. Now it's in protest. Instead there's a society hellbent on inserting it more and it controlling every aspect of our lives. Wrong.

These people are the worst that have ever existed in history. They are contrary to every democratic law and principle. They are not our elected choice. The key word choice. Information isn't there's to usurp. It is our choice in what we deem to be informative. It shouldn't be restricted because it undermines them, or any other challenges to what they're promoting. At what point did the Internet become Tyranny, the day they assumed control over it.

Until today it had done society no favours at all. Look at the cost. Still they insist on restricting it. Because that has worked. No. Not one single solution using the Internet more has worked better. Not even email. Seriously mail was often far more secure. Argues it improved times. At what cost to society how much more crap does it take to get your mail, secure, laughs, hell no. It bombarded you with worsening services. Look at them now. Instead there's a society hellbent on inserting it more and it controlling every aspect of our lives. Wrong.

These people are the worst that have ever existed in history. They are contrary to every democratic law and principle. They are not our elected choice. The key word choice. Information isn't there's to usurp. It is our choice in what we deem to be informative. It shouldn't be restricted because it undermines them, or any other challenges to what they're promoting. At what point did the Internet become Tyranny, the day they assumed control over it.

Until today it had done society no favours at all. Look at the cost. Still they insist on restricting it. Because that has worked. No. Not one single solution using the Internet more has worked better. Not even email. Seriously mail was often far more secure. Argues it improved times. At what cost to society, secure laughs, hell no. It bombarded you with worsening services. Look at them now. Instead there's a society hellbent on inserting it more and it controlling every aspect of our lives. Wrong.

These people are the worst that have ever existed in history. They are contrary to every democratic law and principle. They are not our elected choice. The key word choice. Information isn't there's to usurp. It is our choice in what we deem to be informative. It shouldn't be restricted because it undermines them, or any other challenges to what they're promoting. At what point did the Internet become Tyranny, the day they assumed control over it.

Until today it had done society no favours at all. Look at the cost. Still they insist on restricting it. Because that has worked. No. Not one single solution using the Internet more has worked better. Not even email. Seriously mail was often far more secure. Instead there's a society hellbent on inserting it more and it controlling every aspect of our lives. Wrong.