The original MAD doctrine was fire on everything. Cold War, shit. Theory of would you even want another cunt emerging from that clash been technology and powers. Some other lost tribe from bongaboo, later ruling the planet. So how many nukes did they build. Enough to target the planet several times. Insuring almost complete annihilation. Or the theories of it, off the weapons prepared. Since improving targeting and guidance. Supposedly tactical and what not. Placing in greater debates, scenarios, and rules. Hiding deeper bunkers. But even so, density and infrastructure aren't off the table, nothing theoretically is. If it goes there.
An easier scenario could see them used to prevent further use. But it ain't happening yet. At this rate who knows.
Would a nuke in Ukraine see the entire planet kick off? Would a nuke on Taiwan? Or Iran? Or North Korea?
I bet there are people or programs who calculate it? Of course a person suggests alliances, and defense pacts. But when you're considering the original doctrine. Would it see MAD off any proxies? These questions are being asked. Easier to just propose MAD. In doing so how many more nukes are there today? And faster emerging programs adopting them. Until it becomes MAD, anyway. Or rather not.
Until today, even on this forum, they think they aren't for real. For fucks sake. Not a pretty calculation.
The original MAD doctrine was fire on everything. Cold War, shit. Theory of would you even want another cunt emerging from that clash been technology and powers. Some other lost tribe from bongaboo, later ruling the planet. So how many nukes did they build. Enough to target the planet several times. Insuring almost complete annihilation. Or the theories of it, off the weapons prepared. Since improving targeting and guidance. Supposedly tactical and what not. Placing in greater debates, scenarios, and rules. Hiding deeper bunkers. But even so, density and infrastructure aren't off the table, nothing theoretically is. If it goes there.
An easier scenario could see them used to prevent further use. But it ain't happening yet. At this rate who knows.
Would a nuke in Ukraine see the entire planet kick off? Would a nuke on Taiwan? Or Iran? Or North Korea?
I bet there are people or programs who calculate it? Of course a person suggests alliances, and defense pacts. But when you're considering the original doctrine. Would it see MAD off any proxies? These questions are being asked. Easier to just propose MAD. In doing so how many more nukes are there today? And faster emerging programs adopting them. Until it becomes MAD, anyway. Or rather not.
The original MAD doctrine was fire on everything. Cold War, shit. Theory of would you even want another cunt emerging from that clash been technology and powers. Some other lost tribe from bongaboo, later ruling the planet. So how many nukes did they build. Enough to target the planet several times. Insuring almost complete annihilation. Or the theories of it, off the weapons prepared. Since improving targeting and guidance. Supposedly tactical and what not. Placing in greater debates, scenarios, and rules. Hiding deeper bunkers. But even so, density and infrastructure aren't off the table, nothing theoretically is. If it goes there.
An easier scenario could see them used to prevent further use. But it ain't happening yet. At this rate who knows.
Would a nuke in Ukraine see the entire planet kick off? Would a nuke on Taiwan? Or Iran? Or North Korea?
I bet there are people or programs who calculate it? Of course a person suggests alliances, and defense pacts. But when you're considering the original doctrine. Would it see MAD off any proxies? These questions are being asked. Easier to just propose MAD. In doing so how many more nukes are there today? And faster emerging programs adopting them. Until it becomes MAD, anyway.
The original MAD doctrine was fire on everything. Cold War, shit. Theory of would you even want another cunt emerging from that clash been technology and powers. Some other lost tribe from bongaboo, later ruling the planet. So how many nukes did they build. Enough to target the planet several times. Insuring almost complete annihilation. Or the theories of it, off the weapons prepared. Since improving targeting and guidance. Supposedly tactical and what not. Placing in greater debates, scenarios, and rules. Hiding deeper bunkers. But even so, density and infrastructure aren't off the table, nothing theoretically is. If it goes there.