I neglected to reply to some of your points...

perceptible sound as the foundation for every suggested word shaped out of it.

Here is an interesting point and one that has been studied. Many simple words are intuitive even if you do not speak the language...

Assuming you do not know Japanese, which of these words with zero relationship to any European language means "yes" and which "no"?

hai (pronounced as "high")

or

iieh (pronounced as ee-yeh)

There have even been studies on made up words compared to shapes that have proven sub-lingual "proto-language" across cultures. "Kiki and bouba" make people think of spiky and round.

c) what if nature sets "free will of choice" as the center of the operating system (balance); while other choices are suggesting programs (written information) to domesticate free will of choice by tempting it to consent to suggested information over perceivable inspiration?

Nature sets "reproduction and consumption with least effort" as the center of animal operating systems... the most effective "suggested programs" otherwise known as "persuasion" are ones based on the knowledge of the central drives of animal "operating systems".

In nature it is obvious why maximizing energy intake while minimizing energy output is the central drive, it is survival. But humans, despite possessing higher, abstract drives, are still governed by the simple animal ones. Social cohesion is another drive.

Propaganda, manipulation, persuasion etc. that are effective are all created to activate these animal drives and bypass higher reason.

"Free will of choice" is an anomaly in nature and is a higher motivation since there is no evolutionary reason for it.

Also, "balance" is nearly the opposite of free will... outside of human influence, natural systems tend towards balance or equilibrium, this includes predation and cycles of drought or starvation such that the species in the system reach equilibrium. Free will of choice is at odds with this, it is how humans tipped the natural balance and invented agriculture, irrigation and all other technologies that prevent us from being at the will of nature. It is why we have unbalanced the natural world.

I neglected to reply to some of your points...

perceptible sound as the foundation for every suggested word shaped out of it.

Here is an interesting point and one that has been studied. Many simple words are intuitive even if you do not speak the language...

Assuming you do not know Japanese, which of these words with zero relationship to any European language means "yes" and which "no"?

hai (pronounced as "high")

or

iieh (pronounced as ee-yeh)

There have even been studies on made up words compared to shapes that have proven sub-lingual "proto-language" across cultures. "Kiki and bouba" make people think of spiky and round.

c) what if nature sets "free will of choice" as the center of the operating system (balance); while other choices are suggesting programs (written information) to domesticate free will of choice by tempting it to consent to suggested information over perceivable inspiration?

Nature sets "reproduction and consumption with least effort" as the center of animal operating systems... the most effective "suggested programs" otherwise known as "persuasion" are ones based on the knowledge of the central drives of animal "operating systems".

In nature it is obvious why maximizing energy intake while minimizing energy output is the central drive, it is survival. But humans, despite possessing higher, abstract drives, are still governed by the simple animal ones. Social cohesion is another drive.

Propaganda, manipulation, persuasion etc. that are effective are all created to activate these animal drives and bypass higher reason.

"Free will of choice" is an anomaly in nature and is a higher motivation since there is no evolutionary reason for it.