Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Not the point of this.

Controlling the food is simply to automate it. Have you seen the new robotic farms. They grow millions and millions of veg yearly, in a robotic greenhouse using no soil but a shit ton of electricity and water and robots. It gets harvested and sent to the next robot factory turning it into plant food, supplementing meat. Or as alternative, entire farmland automated where the seeders, fertilizers, growers, harvesters are all robotic, requiring far more electricity to run.

It has nothing to do with anything else. Apart from assuming control by selling a solution upon creating the problem.

It is everything tying into their services, the robots, the parts, the mainframes running them, the grid, the energy how and where were the parts made, and the distribution, all connected into an electric grid and the Internet. No sooner is transport. I.Ds. Vaxes. Currency.

It hasn't solved anything else. Just assuming control for more profit. No sooner are you suppressed. The level they want is you are outlawed for not buying their bullshit. Until you can't keep livestock or grow your own food. Austraila. Until you can't make fire, it needs to come from electricity. Because you have to buy all this other stuff instead. If you don't, implementing it means collapsing the current method and its distribution to force their services. It means starving all the other eaters previously buying their bullshit distribution. Ukraine's bread basket, etc.

At what point have these dumb populations forgot to feed themselves. The day they needed the globohomos feeding them. All they do is assume control for profit. No other motivation. No other point. The technology has surpassed the current means, creating a population tipping point relying on the older method. Technology is the problem forcing the solution for power and profit.

It isn't better. Can you think of anything more insane. You cannot grow food because you needed a globohomo's robots doing it for you. Is it better. No, it causes increasing consumption once the demand has caught up. All those parts and services need more resources to operate. Then they regulate you far more, until robots are responsible for human food. Real smart.

Sure it's bad today, the government tells farmers what to grow, how to plant, providing them the seeds, and regulating anything else by taxes or closures. But what we're walking into is far worse. It has created the demand, off a few lies, the weather, distribution, to assume control. Then these previous cattle barons, become even wealthier. The corps win here on a scale never seen in history on a means they control completely, until they're sooner automating it fully.

Imagine it causing World Wars last century and prior. Horses gone for the car and railroad. Taxation forced. All the car did was cause taxes. Regulating what you purchased to operate it. This what is happening here, and it could become sooner. War, unrest, and increasing taxation. Implementing a system controlling you more. It won't change anything else. It's worse this time. It's assuming far more at increasing cost of automation. More stuff is needed, at greater costs. It doesn't quit, it cannot, it's there to be profited from. It will gain control no matter what ants it crushes.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not the point of this.

Controlling the food is simply to automate it. Have you seen the new robotic farms. They grow millions and millions of veg yearly, in a robotic greenhouse using no soil but a shit ton of electricity and water and robots. It gets harvested and sent to the next robot factory turning it into plant food, supplementing meat. Or as alternative, entire farmland automated where the seeders, fertilizers, growers, harvesters are all robotic, requiring far more electricity to run.

It has nothing to do with anything else. Apart from assuming control by selling a solution upon creating the problem.

It is everything tying into their services, the robots, the parts, the mainframes running them, the grid, the energy how and where were the parts made, and the distribution, all connected into an electric grid and the Internet. No sooner is transport. I.Ds. Vaxes. Currency.

It hasn't solved anything else. Just assuming control for more profit. No sooner are you suppressed. The level they want is you are outlawed for not buying their bullshit. Until you can't keep livestock or grow your own food. Austraila. Until you can't make fire, it needs to come from electricity. Because you have to buy all this other stuff instead. If you don't, implementing it means collapsing the current method and its distribution to force their services. It means starving all the other eaters previously buying their bullshit distribution. Ukraine's bread basket, etc.

At what point have these dumb populations forgot to feed themselves. The day they needed the globohomos feeding them. All they do is assume control for profit. No other motivation. No other point. The technology has surpassed the current means, creating a population tipping point relying on the older method. Technology is the problem forcing the solution for power and profit.

It isn't better. Can you think of anything more insane. You cannot grow food because you needed a globohomo's robots doing it for you. Is it better. No, it causes increasing consumption once the demand has caught up. All those parts and services need more resources to operate. Then they regulate you far more, until robots are responsible for human food. Real smart.

Sure it's bad today, the government tells farmers what to grow, how to plant, providing them the seeds, and regulating anything else by taxes or closures. But what we're walking into is far worse. It has created the demand, off a few lies, the weather, distribution, to assume control. Then these previous cattle barons, become even wealthier. The corps win here on a scale never seen in history on a means they control completely, until they're sooner automating it fully.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not the point of this.

Controlling the food is simply to automate it. Have you seen the new robotic farms. They grow millions and millions of veg yearly, in a robotic greenhouse using no soil but a shit ton of electricity and water and robots. It gets harvested and sent to the next robot factory turning it into plant food, supplementing meat. Or as alternative, entire farmland automated where the seeders, fertilizers, growers, harvesters are all robotic, requiring far more electricity to run.

It has nothing to do with anything else. Apart from assuming control by selling a solution upon creating the problem.

It is everything tying into their services, the robots, the parts, the mainframes running them, the grid, the energy how and where were the parts made, and the distribution, all connected into an electric grid and the Internet. No sooner is transport. I.Ds. Vaxes. Currency.

It hasn't solved anything else. Just assuming control for more profit. No sooner are you suppressed. The level they want is you are outlawed for not buying their bullshit. Until you can't keep livestock or grow your own food. Austraila. Until you can't make fire, it needs to come from electricity. Because you have to buy all this other stuff instead. If you don't, implementing it means collapsing the current method and its distribution to force their services. It means starving all the other eaters previously buying their bullshit distribution. Ukraine's bread basket, etc.

At what point have these dumb populations forgot to feed themselves. The day they needed the globohomos feeding them. All they do is assume control for profit. No other motivation. No other point. The technology has surpassed the current means, creating a population tipping point relying on the older method. Technology is the problem forcing the solution for power and profit.

It isn't better. Can you think of anything more insane. You cannot grow food because you needed a globohomo's robots doing it for you. Is it better. No, it causes increasing consumption once the demand has caught up. All those parts and services need more resources to operate. Then they regulate you far more, until robots are responsible for human food. Real smart.

Sure it's bad today, the government tells farmers what to grow, how to plant, providing them the seeds, and regulating anything else by taxes or closures. But what we're walking into is far worse. It has created the demand, of a few lies, to assume control. Then these previous cattle barons, become even wealthier. The corps win here on a scale never seen in history on a means they control completely, until they're sooner automating it fully.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not the point of this.

Controlling the food is simply to automate it. Have you seen the new robotic farms. They grow millions and millions of veg yearly, in a robotic greenhouse using no soil but a shit ton of electricity and water and robots. It gets harvested and sent to the next robot factory turning it into plant food, supplementing meat. Or as alternative, entire farmland automated where the seeders, fertilizers, growers, harvesters are all robotic, requiring far more electricity to run.

It has nothing to do with anything else. Apart from assuming control by selling a solution upon creating the problem.

It is everything tying into their services, the robots, the parts, the mainframes running them, the grid, the energy how and where were the parts made, and the distribution, all connected into an electric grid and the Internet. No sooner is transport. I.Ds. Vaxes. Currency.

It hasn't solved anything else. Just assuming control for more profit. No sooner are you suppressed. The level they want is you are outlawed for not buying their bullshit. Until you can't keep livestock or grow your own food. Austraila. Until you can't make fire, it needs to come from electricity. Because you have to buy all this other stuff instead. If you don't, implementing it means collapsing the current method and its distribution to force their services. It means starving all the other eaters previously buying their bullshit distribution. Ukraine's bread basket, etc.

At what point have these dumb populations forgot to feed themselves. The day they needed the globohomos feeding them. All they do is assume control for profit. No other motivation. No other point. The technology has surpassed the current means, creating a population tipping point relying on the older method. Technology is the problem forcing the solution for power and profit.

It isn't better. Can you think of anything more insane. You cannot grow food because you needed a globohomo's robots doing it for you. Is it better. No, it causes increasing consumption once the demand has caught up. All those parts and services need more resources to operate. Then they regulate you far more, until robots are responsible for human food. Real smart.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not the point of this.

Controlling the food is simply to automate it. Have you seen the new robotic farms. They grow millions and millions of veg yearly, in a robotic greenhouse using no soil but a shit ton of electricity and water and robots. Itgets harvested and sent to the next robot factory turning it into plant food, supplementing meat. Or as alternative, entire farmland automated where the seeders, fertilizers, growers, harvesters are all robotic, requiring far more electricity to run.

It has nothing to do with anything else. Apart from assuming control by selling a solution upon creating the problem.

It is everything tying into their services, the robots, the parts, the mainframes running them, the grid, the energy how and where were the parts made, and the distribution, all connected into an electric grid and the Internet. No sooner is transport. I.Ds. Vaxes. Currency.

It hasn't solved anything else. Just assuming control for more profit. No sooner are you suppressed. The level they want is you are outlawed for not buying their bullshit. Until you can't keep livestock or grow your own food. Austraila. Until you can't make fire, it needs to come from electricity. Because you have to buy all this other stuff instead. If you don't, implementing it means collapsing the current method and its distribution to force their services. It means starving all the other eaters previously buying their bullshit distribution. Ukraine's bread basket, etc.

At what point have these dumb populations forgot to feed themselves. The day they needed the globohomos feeding them. All they do is assume control for profit. No other motivation. No other point. The technology has surpassed the current means, creating a population tipping point relying on the older method. Technology is the problem forcing the solution for power and profit.

It isn't better. Can you think of anything more insane. You cannot grow food because you needed a globohomo's robots doing it for you. Is it better. No, it causes increasing consumption once the demand has caught up. All those parts and services need more resources to operate. Then they regulate you far more, until robots are responsible for human food. Real smart.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Not the point of this.

Controlling the food is simply to automate it. Have you seen the new robotic farms. They grow millions and millions of veg yearly, in a robotic greenhouse using no soil but a shit ton of electricity and water and robots. Itgets harvested and sent to the next robot factory turning it into plant food, supplementing meat. Or as alternative, entire farmland automated where the seeders, fertilizers, growers, harvesters are all robotic, requiring far more electricity to run.

It has nothing to do with anything else. Apart from assuming control by selling a solution upon creating the problem.

It is everything tying into their services, the robots, the parts, the mainframes running them, the grid, the energy how and where were the parts made, and the distribution, all connected into an electric grid and the Internet. No sooner is transport. I.Ds. Vaxes. Currency.

It hasn't solved anything else. Just assuming control for more profit. No sooner are you suppressed. The level they want is you are outlawed for not buying their bullshit. Until you can't keep livestock or grow your food. You can't make fire, it needs to come from electricity. Because you have to buy all this other stuff instead. If you don't, implementing it means collapsing the current method and its distribution to force their services. It means starving all the other eaters previously buying their bullshit distribution. Ukraine's bread basket etc. At what point have these dumb populations forgot to feed themselves. The day they needed the globohomos feeding them. All they do is assume control for profit. No other motivation. No other point. The technology has surpassed the current means creating a population tipping point relying on the older method. It is the problem forcing the solution for power and profit.

It isn't better. Can you think of anything more insane. You cannot grow food because you needed a globohomo robots doing it for you. Is it better no it causes increasing consumption once the demand has caught up. All those parts and services need more resources to operate. Then they regulate you far more, until robots are responsible for human food. Real smart.

1 year ago
1 score