Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Yawn, nuclear winter is vastly different to there being no sun at all. No the globe doesn't go completely dark. Even the poles have the Sun for limited durations, even toxic Venus has the Sun, not necessarily penetrating through its clouds. But it still causes that Planet to exist. If we don't have the Sun, our atmosphere changes. It would vastly change without our carbons. Carbons wiped out in an Ice-age. Nitrogen our main gas, level, would plummet. Who can even calculate it. Because prior to this concept, our geography has changed. Vastly changed. In order to adapt to it, there is no accounting for it. Only a suggestion of what if. Often stupidly. They live on Antarctica because there is the Sun. But the tectonic plates would bring their own catastrophe. Catastrophe so violent you could make something here and there, and what's to suggest it isn't wiped out.

Yawn. Literally no understanding. You have suggested something contrary. It is insane. It doesn't formulate. It is incorrect.

BTW I am far too private, to go make channels getting me banned. I have acquired a lifetime of knowledge by experience and assimilation through study, or the logical debate from it. I am banned instantly on Reddit by my IP on many subs connected to the press. They fucking hate my guts because I challenge their bullshit, instead of simply agreeing with it. I am not banned by the press, only a cabal of freaks thinking their comments do fuck all. But I wouldn't think to put my face out there. When I have, it gets the freaks attacking it. I have no desire to get banned off youtube. I don't make bullshit, I debate it.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Yawn, nuclear winter is vastly different to there being no sun at all. No the globe doesn't go completely dark. Even the poles have the Sun for limited durations, even toxic Venus has the Sun, not necessarily penetrating through its clouds. But it still causes that Planet to exist. If we don't have the Sun, our atmosphere changes. It would vastly change without our carbons. Carbons wiped out in an Ice-age. Nitrogen our main gas, level, would plummet. Who can even calculate it. Because prior to this concept, our geography has changed. Vastly changed. In order to adapt to it, there is no accounting for it. Only a suggestion of what if. Often stupidly. They live on Antarctica because there is the Sun. But the tectonic plates would bring their own catastrophe. Catastrophe so violent you could make something here and there, and what's to suggest it isn't wiped out.

Yawn. Literally no understanding. You have suggested something contrary. It is insane. It doesn't formulate. It is incorrect.

BTW I am far too private, to go make channels getting me banned. I have acquired a lifetime of knowledge by assimilation through study, or logical debate from it. I am banned instantly on Reddit by my IP on many subs connected to the press. They fucking hate my guts because I challenge their bullshit, instead of simply agreeing with it. I am not banned by the press only a cabal of freaks thinking their comments do fuck all. But I wouldn't think to put my face out there. When I have, it gets the freaks attacking it. I have no desire to get banned off youtube. I don't make bullshit, I debate it.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Yawn, nuclear winter is vastly different to there being no sun at all. No the globe doesn't go completely dark. Even the poles have the Sun for limited durations, even toxic Venus has the Sun, not necessarily penetrating through its clouds. But it still causes that Planet to exist. If we don't have the Sun, our atmosphere changes. It would vastly change without our carbons. Carbons wiped out in an Ice-age. Nitrogen our main gas, level, would plummet. Who can even calculate it. Because prior to this concept, our geography has changed. Vastly changed. In order to adapt to it, there is no accounting for it. Only a suggestion of what if. Often stupidly. They live on Antarctica because there is the Sun. But the tectonic plates would bring their own catastrophe. Catastrophe so violent you could make something here and there, and what's to suggest it isn't wiped out.

Yawn. Literally no understanding. You have suggested something contrary. It is insane. It doesn't formulate. It is incorrect.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Yawn, nuclear winter is vastly different to there being no sun at all. No the globe doesn't go completely dark. Even the poles have the Sun for limited durations, even toxic Venus has the Sun, not necessarily penetrating through its clouds. But it still causes that Planet to exist. If we don't have the Sun, our atmosphere changes. It would vastly change without our carbons. Carbons wiped out in an Ice-age. Nitrogen our main gas, level, would plummet. Who can even calculate it. Because prior to this concept, our geography has changed. Vastly changed. In order to adapt to it, there is no accounting for it. Only a suggestion of what if. Often stupidly. They live on Antarctica because there is the Sun. But the tectonic plates would bring their own catastrophe. Catastrophe so violent you could make something here and there what's to suggest it isn't wiped out.

Yawn. Literally no understanding. You have suggested something contrary. It is insane. It doesn't formulate. It is incorrect.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Yawn nuclear winter is vastly different to there being no sun at all. No the globe doesn't go completely dark. Even the poles have the Sun for limited durations, even toxic Venus has the Sun, not necessarily penetrating through its clouds. If we don't have the Sun our atmosphere changes. It would vastly change without our carbons. Carbons wiped out in an Ice-age. Nitrogen our main gas, level, would plummet. Who can even calculate it. Becauae prior to this concept, our geography has changed. Vastly changed. In order to adapt to it, there is no accounting for it. Only a suggestion of what if. Often stupidly. They live on Antarctica because there is the Sum. But the tectonic plates would bring their own catastrophe. Catastrophe so violent you could make something here and there what's to suggest it isn't wiped out.

Yawn. Literally no understanding. You have suggested something contrary. It is insane. It doesn't formulate. It is incorrect.

2 years ago
1 score