"u/name" to tag
Look, the research has to be related. Citing stuff for other viruses really is not helpful unless you're establishing background which we are past. Show me a way to surveil safety that is more accurate than VAERS or else it's a mute point since VAERS data clearly deconstructs the safety argument. Absolute risk is less than 0.1%. I'm not interested in evaluating relative risk unless you are willing to do time series analysis.
Also, I'd say you are quite disrespectful so unless that changes I'm not willing to debate with you. I think your sources are ridiculous but I continue to offer a resolution without attacking you.
Literally. It's laughable, then you are hurt and think I am personally attacking you because I call you out on absolute BULLSHIT that you post on here.
🤦♂️ see you're not interested in understanding, you're interested in winning
"u/name" to tag
Look, the research has to be related. Citing stuff for other viruses really is not helpful unless you're establishing background which we are past. Show me a way to surveil safety that is more accurate than VAERS or else it's a mute point since VAERS data clearly deconstructs the safety argument. Absolute risk is less than 0.1%. I'm not interested in evaluating relative risk unless you are willing to do time series analysis.
Also, I'd say you are quite disrespectful so unless that changes I'm not willing to debate with you. I think your sources are ridiculous but I continue to offer a resolution without attacking you.
Literally. It's laughable, then you are hurt and think I am personally attacking you because I call you out on absolute BULLSHIT that you post on here.
🤦♂️ see you're not interested in understanding, you're interested in winning
"u/name" to tag
Look, the research has to be related. Citing stuff for other viruses really is not helpful unless you're establishing background which we are past. Show me a way to surveil safety that is more accurate than VAERS or else it's a mute point since VAERS data clearly deconstructs the safety argument. Absolute risk is less than 0.1%. I'm not interested in evaluating relative risk unless you are willing to do time series analysis.
Also, I'd say you are quite disrespectful so unless that changes I'm not willing to debate with you. I think your sources are ridiculous but I continue to offer a resolution.