DavidColeIntrepid1 points52 minutes ago https://thecountersignal.com/99-per-cent-covid-deaths-in-canada-among-vaccinated/
"Learn maffs nigga"
Do you know what "cherry picking" is?
So the claim here is that in one week, 222 vaccinated people died vs, only 1 unvaccinated person.
Let's look at that data:
Unvaxxed deaths through April 10: 9,511
Unvaxxed deaths through April 17: 9,512
So yes, it's true that there was only 1 unvaxxed death reported to PHAS from April 10 - April 17.
Fully vaxxed deaths through April 10: (2,770 + 1,835=) 4,605
Fully vaxxed through April 17: (2,832 + 1,995=) 4,827
That's a difference of 222 and includes Fully vaxxed and Fully + booster).
So that's correct. But we're missing a big a problem when it's reported as 99.6% of deaths are fully vaccinated.
- It's cherry-picked data--only one week.
- It leaves out totals. Let's compare totals:
Unvaxxed deaths through April 17: 9,512
Fully Vaxxed deaths through April 10: 4,827
Total: 14,339
%Deaths (Unvaxxed): 9,512/14,339 = 66.3%
%Deaths (Vaxxed): 4,827/14,339 = 33.7%
So nearly 2/3 of the total deaths (uvaxxed + fully vaxxed) are unvaxxed vs only 1/3 vaxxed.
So tell me how reporting this as evidence that vaccines don't work is not misleading? Anybody who can do math can look at the data presented and if it weren't such a serious subject just laugh out loud at the gross stupidity of the person who wrote that article. But there are enough people on the right who just don't have the math skills to do that so they think this article says something that supports their preconceived ideas. It's just confirmation bias.
That you would cite this and some argument against me is just laughable. It doesn't help your case in anyway. And I know your responses to me will be entirely vacuous. Meaningless. Insults with no analysis or argument to support them. Please, try harder.
We can go further, let's look at the n for each case.
For unvaxxed the n is: 945,183 For fully vaxxed the n is: (723,415 + 250,951=) 974,366 Total: 1,919,549
%Pop unvaxxed: 49.2% %Pop vaxxed: 50.8%
So all things being equal, we would expect the total deaths to be roughly 50-50. But instead it breaks down to 66:34.
Once again, you only reveal your inability to understand the math.
Feed me some more.
DavidColeIntrepid1 points52 minutes ago https://thecountersignal.com/99-per-cent-covid-deaths-in-canada-among-vaccinated/
"Learn maffs nigga"
Do you know what "cherry picking" is?
So the claim here is that in one week, 222 vaccinated people died vs, only 1 unvaccinated person.
Let's look at that data:
Unvaxxed deaths through April 10: 9,511
Unvaxxed deaths through April 17: 9,512
So yes, it's true that there was only 1 unvaxxed death reported to PHAS from April 10 - April 17.
Fully vaxxed deaths through April 10: (2,770 + 1,835=) 4,605
Fully vaxxed through April 17: (2,832 + 1,995=) 4,827
That's a difference of 222 and includes Fully vaxxed and Fully + booster).
So that's correct. But we're missing a big a problem when it's reported as 99.6% of deaths are fully vaccinated.
- It's cherry-picked data--only one week.
- It leaves out totals. Let's compare totals:
Unvaxxed deaths through April 17: 9,512
Fully Vaxxed deaths through April 10: 4,827
Total: 14,339
%Deaths (Unvaxxed): 9,512/14,339 = 66.3%
%Deaths (Vaxxed): 4,827/14,339 = 33.7%
So nearly 2/3 of the total deaths (uvaxxed + fully vaxxed) are unvaxxed vs only 1/3 vaxxed.
So tell me how reporting this as evidence that vaccines don't work is not misleading? Anybody who can do math can look at the data presented and if it weren't such a serious subject just laugh out loud at the gross stupidity of the person who wrote that article. But there are enough people on the right who just don't have the math skills to do that so they think this article says something that supports their preconceived ideas. It's just confirmation bias.
That you would cite this and some argument against me is just laughable. It doesn't help your case in anyway. And I know your responses to me will be entirely vacuous. Meaningless. Insults with no analysis or argument to support them. Please, try harder.
Let's break that down by percent: