No my debate is solid. The nature is that you have reproductive organs and hormones. It leads to sex by nature from reproducing, adapting, and surviving. The choice by nature is therefore bisexual. It is with every mammal, and many other species. But specifically our species. Sex is a product of environment and experience, leading to instinct or preference.

Science would argue unbalanced rogue genes. But this isn't factual when regardless of hormone levels your biology will always be bisexual, choosing how you have sex and any preferences towards it.

Or please try to argue otherwise. Asexual is contrary to our species reproduction. But sex becomes a preference.

No my debate is solid. The nature is that you have reproductive organs and hormones. It leads to sex by nature from reproducing, adapting, and surviving. The choice by nature is therefore bisexual. It is with every mammal, and many other species. But specifically our species. Sex is a product of environment and experience, leading to instinct or preference.

Science would argue unbalanced rogue genes. But this isn't factual when regardless of hormone levels your biology will always be bisexual, choosing how you have sex and any preferences towards it.

Or please try to argue otherwise. Asexual is contrary to our species reproduction. But sex becomes a prreference.

No my debate is solid. The nature is that you have reproductive organs and hormones. It leads to sex by nature from reproducing, adapting, and surviving. The choice by nature is therefore bisexual. It is with every mammal, and many other species. But specifically our species. Sex is a product of environment and experience, leading to instinct or preference.

Science would argue unbalanced rogue genes. But this isn't factual when regardless of hormone levels your biology will always be bisexual, choosing how you have sex and any preferences towards it.