"the Power of Associative Thinking"

That represents choice (suggestion) as the power of the few towards choice (consent); which associates (unite in the same mass) the many into a chain of command under the few aka a contract law (also called religion; religo - "to bind anew") that shapes consenting memory (mind) to think in suggested information, instead of adapting to perceived inspiration.

In short...the few suggest what the consenting many think about (fiction); while the many ignore the perceived world (reality). Each one represents an expression of reality; while suggested fiction allows others to shape expressions within ignored reality (allegory of the golem).

"The internet itself has even been compared to the Talmud...layers upon layers of commentary dealing with issues from personal hygiene to oven construction"..."However the internet is only truly comparable to the Talmud if it’s dialogue eventually returns to G-dly matters"

The "Gemara" part of the talmud deals with suggested information; while the "Mishna" part of the talmud deals with perceived inspiration aka laws of nature (perceived inspiration) and laws of men (suggested information). The entire internet net of suggested information (internet) represents a govern (control) ment (mind) tool for the many who ignore the laws of nature for the suggested laws of men.

The communication on the internet is based on reasoning (want versus not want conflict) caused by consenting to want or not want suggested information. Meanwhile; the so called talmud covers the use of implication (if/then) over reason (want vs not want; true vs false; good vs evil etc.); which allows those who comprehend perceived inspiration (natural law aka flow to form aka balance to choice aka action to reaction) to control those who stand under (understanding) suggested information (contract law aka laws of men aka choice to choice aka consent to suggestion).

The return of the dialogue represents transmutation of suggested words back to perceived sound; which can now been seen with encircling (ouroboros) restrictions upon speech; which will eventually lead back to the issue of idolatry...choosing want (suggested information) over need (perceived inspiration). Branding (words) a moving (sound) system (energy) represents idolatry (representation aka response to presented...not the origin of meaning; but the response shaped out of it).

Edit: the hand behind the internet only points out the farmers; not the landowners...look into the Wallenberg family.

"the Power of Associative Thinking"

That represents choice (suggestion) as the power of the few towards choice (consent); which associates (unite in the same mass) the many into a chain of command under the few aka a contract law (also called religion; religo - "to bind anew") that shapes consenting memory (mind) to think in suggested information, instead of adapting to perceived inspiration.

In short...the few suggest what the consenting many think about (fiction); while the many ignore the perceived world (reality). Each one represents an expression of reality; while suggested fiction allows others to shape expressions within ignored reality (allegory of the golem).

"The internet itself has even been compared to the Talmud...layers upon layers of commentary dealing with issues from personal hygiene to oven construction"..."However the internet is only truly comparable to the Talmud if it’s dialogue eventually returns to G-dly matters"

The "Gemara" part of the talmud deals with suggested information; while the "Mishna" part of the talmud deals with perceived inspiration aka laws of nature (perceived inspiration) and laws of men (suggested information). The entire internet net of suggested information (internet) represents a govern (control) ment (mind) tool for the many who ignore the laws of nature for the suggested laws of men.

The communication on the internet is based on reasoning (want versus not want conflict) caused by consenting to want or not want suggested information. Meanwhile; the so called talmud covers the use of implication (if/then) over reason (want vs not want; true vs false; good vs evil etc.); which allows those who comprehend perceived inspiration (natural law aka flow to form aka balance to choice aka action to reaction) to control those who stand under (understanding) suggested information (contract law aka laws of men aka choice to choice aka consent to suggestion).

The return of the dialogue represents transmutation of suggested words back to perceived sound; which can now been seen with encircling (ouroboros) restrictions upon speech; which will eventually lead back to the issue of idolatry...choosing want (suggested information) over need (perceived inspiration). Branding (words) a moving (sound) system (energy) represents idolatry (representation aka response to presented...not the origin of meaning; but the response shaped out of it).