Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Interesting. I'm not saying that I've fallen hook line and sinker for the venom story, but it definitely definitely definitely has some seriously compelling points that cannot be simply brushed aside as "absolute bullshit".

The fact that Cliff has always seemed to keep it so real is difficult to reconcile with his course "absolute bullshit" take on this venom narrative, unless you accept that either A) the venom narrative has threatened his ego / brand with a new narrative or B) that he is one of their higher level disinformation agents and has been reserved thus far for something really important, which the venom narrative would definitely qualify as. The more obvious explanation would be A, but, in entertaining B, one can't help but think of the WEF/elite connection to crypto, which is what made Cliff famous to begin with.

The other thing that's impossible to ignore is that pretty much anyone in America learned at some point in their life that "1 drop of [insert any one of dozens of snake species] venom can kill 1000 people". That's one of those fun facts that you learned from every snake person as a kid, nature TV shows, etc. It's difficult to imagine that Cliff couldn't have possibly had this thought while trying to think through the argument that you would need to have an entire planet of snakes in order to produce enough poison to lightly poison everyone. It would be different if it was considered to be common knowledge that you needed half a syringe full of snake venom to kill a person, but a gallon of king cobra venom would probably be enough to kill New York City.

Once you know somebody said something that you know that they know just doesn't pan out in reality, then you have to question everything they say or ever have said, and their motives...

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Interesting. I'm not saying that I've fallen hook line and sinker for the venom story, but it definitely definitely definitely has some seriously compelling points that cannot be simply brushed aside as "absolute bullshit".

The fact that Cliff has always seemed to keep it so real is difficult to reconcile with his course "absolute bullshit" take on this venom narrative, unless you accept that either A) the venom narrative has threatened his ego / brand with a new narrative or B) that he is one of their higher level disinformation agents and has been reserved thus far for something really important, which the venom narrative would definitely qualify as. The more obvious explanation would be A, but, in entertaining B, one can't help but think of the WEF/elite connection to crypto, which is what made Cliff famous to begin with.

The other thing that's impossible to ignore is that pretty much anyone in America learned at some point in their life that "1 drop of [insert any one of dozens of snake species] venom can kill 1000 people". That's one of those fun facts that you learned from every snake person as a kid, nature TV shows, etc. It's difficult to imagine that Cliff couldn't have possibly had this thought while trying to think through the argument that you would need to have an entire planet of snakes in order to produce enough poison to lightly poison everyone. It would be different if it was considered to be common knowledge that you needed half a syringe full of snake venom to kill a person, but a gallon of king cobra venom would probably be enough to kill New York City.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Interesting. I'm not saying that I've fallen hook line and sinker for the venom story, but it definitely definitely definitely has some seriously compelling points that cannot be simply brushed aside as "absolute bullshit". The fact that Cliff has always seemed to keep it so real, that's difficult to reconcile with his "absolute bullshit" take on this venom story, unless you accept that either A) the venom narrative has threatened his ego / brand with a new narrative or B) that he is one of their higher level disinformation agents and has been reserved thus far for something really important, which the venom narrative would definitely qualify as. The more obvious explanation would be A, but I can't help but think of the WEF/elite connection to crypto, which is what made Cliff famous to begin with.

2 years ago
1 score