Your long responses show that effort was spent and therefore out of respect for you I am responding back
Maybe just maybe I might actually get honest civil debate free of insults and trolling that answers questions without evasion or gaslighting.
despite your writing being full of poor logic and enough gratuitous transphobia for me to think you're trolling or crazy.
lol I guess it was too much to ask
Ironically, you seem to be trying to gaslight us.
Who would this us be? I've been transparent.
To answer your question more directly: Firstly, in my opinion it is not on topic. Conspiracy forums are about conspiracies and not social commentary from South Park or your own personal crusades.
Biological males receiving women's awards and competing in women's sports is a conspiracy.
The LGBTQ lobby has positioned itself within social media and intimidated, bullied, threatened, and canceled anyone that might say that a biological male is a transgender woman or question whether CIS women feel disenfranchised by biological males receiving women's awards and competing in women's competitions.
Biological Women are being abused and treated unfairly
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFl88Wkz6eI
That was the essence of the South Park 'social commentary'. Joe Rogan has discussed this as have many other comedians and public commentators.
This topic is not going away so long as biological males identifying as women seek to enter women's competitions, receive women's awards, be permitted in women's locker rooms and bathrooms et. al.
https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1506359042838446083
https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1506641917299232771
I didn't dodge anything
sure lol
I hope you aren't still holding on to the delusion that I myself am actually a r/conspiracy moderator.
sure lol
What is the TOS violation? Is it because the topic is simply LGBTQ, and controversial? Is it reporting that USA Today gave Rachel Levine a women of the year award? Is it stating that Rachel Levine is a biological man identifying as a woman? Is it stating that transgender women are biological males? Is it asking if CIS women feel disenfranchised by a biological male receiving a woman's award? Is it by raising any question it might unintentionally raise awareness that the LGBTQ lobby have been repeatedly trying to erase and censor 200+ years of human biology, psychology, medicine, and the field of science itself? None of these topics or questions are 'hate speech' or inciting violence.
You are working with a group of people in an attempt to harm the r/conspiracy subreddit. We know this because you were caught trying to bait people into violating the Reddit Content Policy. It is not plausible that you have a psychological need to remind transgender people about how they were born and you believe that conspiracy forums are the place to do that. Now you are trying to harm the reputation of that subreddit. It would not surprise me if your responses in this thread were a group effort.
And more dodging lol
You really appear incapable of engaging in honest discussion.
To restate:
I did not incite anyone to hate or promote violence against transgender people.
Posting a picture of Biden Assistant HHS secretary Rachel Levine winning USA Today 'women of the year' award and in the submission statement politely raising the question asking if CIS women feel disenfranchised by biological males identifying as transgender women when permitted to compete in awards and sports competitions is not promoting hate or inciting violence.
That is called debate.
Biological males have XY chromosomes in their DNA and are born with male physical characteristics. You can't simply wish this away even if you call yourself a woman.
The argument is based on human biology.
Also to repeat
I really am getting the distinct impression you are a mod of r/conspiracy trolling here to defend running a honeypot while issuing perm bans using private blacklists for wrongthink.
I am no part of SPLC or TMOR, but your motives are fairly transparent here. Did you really think coming here anonymously to peddle the same nonsense and defend your actions was going to look convincing?
I repeatedly stated I was willing to post within a sandbox and asked for a list of banned topics in r/conspiracy to prevent further misunderstanding. Mods refused to answer.
I compromised and communicated that in the future I would not state in r/conspiracy that a 'biological male is a transgender woman'
That was not good enough for the mod. They wanted me to bend the knee, grovel, and conform to their world view that saying or implying that a 'biological male is a transgender woman' is 'hate speech' and a TOS violation. As stated, I can agree not to discuss a list of banned topics in r/conspiracy, but will not be bullied into saying this is 'hate speech' and disregarding human biology.
If they would have said, please refrain from discussing LGBTQ as it could subject the sub to reprisal from Admin, I would have honored the request.
Irrelevant. I am going to guess that you have seen it in your very long discussion with the r/conspiracy mods. I am not one of those people.
sure lol
I hope that was all of your questions; you sometimes leave out the question mark.
You dodged all the relevant questions so again...
I see no reason to further continue responding to you if you are going to evade my questions, gaslight me, and not engage in honest discussion.
Your long responses show that effort was spent and therefore out of respect for you I am responding back
Maybe just maybe I might actually get honest civil debate free of insults that answers questions without evasion or gaslighting.
despite your writing being full of poor logic and enough gratuitous transphobia for me to think you're trolling or crazy.
lol I guess it was too much to ask
Ironically, you seem to be trying to gaslight us.
Who would this us be? I've been transparent.
To answer your question more directly: Firstly, in my opinion it is not on topic. Conspiracy forums are about conspiracies and not social commentary from South Park or your own personal crusades.
Biological males receiving women's awards and competing in women's sports is a conspiracy.
The LGBTQ lobby has positioned itself within social media and intimidated, bullied, threatened, and canceled anyone that might say that a biological male is a transgender woman or question whether CIS women feel disenfranchised by biological males receiving women's awards and competing in women's competitions.
Biological Women are being abused and treated unfairly
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFl88Wkz6eI
That was the essence of the South Park 'social commentary'. Joe Rogan has discussed this as have many other comedians and public commentators.
This topic is not going away so long as biological males identifying as women seek to enter women's competitions, receive women's awards, be permitted in women's locker rooms and bathrooms et. al.
https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1506359042838446083
https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1506641917299232771
I didn't dodge anything
sure lol
I hope you aren't still holding on to the delusion that I myself am actually a r/conspiracy moderator.
sure lol
What is the TOS violation? Is it because the topic is simply LGBTQ, and controversial? Is it reporting that USA Today gave Rachel Levine a women of the year award? Is it stating that Rachel Levine is a biological man identifying as a woman? Is it stating that transgender women are biological males? Is it asking if CIS women feel disenfranchised by a biological male receiving a woman's award? Is it by raising any question it might unintentionally raise awareness that the LGBTQ lobby have been repeatedly trying to erase and censor 200+ years of human biology, psychology, medicine, and the field of science itself? None of these topics or questions are 'hate speech' or inciting violence.
You are working with a group of people in an attempt to harm the r/conspiracy subreddit. We know this because you were caught trying to bait people into violating the Reddit Content Policy. It is not plausible that you have a psychological need to remind transgender people about how they were born and you believe that conspiracy forums are the place to do that. Now you are trying to harm the reputation of that subreddit. It would not surprise me if your responses in this thread were a group effort.
And more dodging lol
You really appear incapable of engaging in honest discussion.
To restate:
I did not incite anyone to hate or promote violence against transgender people.
Posting a picture of Biden Assistant HHS secretary Rachel Levine winning USA Today 'women of the year' award and in the submission statement politely raising the question asking if CIS women feel disenfranchised by biological males identifying as transgender women when permitted to compete in awards and sports competitions is not promoting hate or inciting violence.
That is called debate.
Biological males have XY chromosomes in their DNA and are born with male physical characteristics. You can't simply wish this away even if you call yourself a woman.
The argument is based on human biology.
Also to repeat
I really am getting the distinct impression you are a mod of r/conspiracy trolling here to defend running a honeypot while issuing perm bans using private blacklists for wrongthink.
I am no part of SPLC or TMOR, but your motives are fairly transparent here. Did you really think coming here anonymously to peddle the same nonsense and defend your actions was going to look convincing?
I repeatedly stated I was willing to post within a sandbox and asked for a list of banned topics in r/conspiracy to prevent further misunderstanding. Mods refused to answer.
I compromised and communicated that in the future I would not state in r/conspiracy that a 'biological male is a transgender woman'
That was not good enough for the mod. They wanted me to bend the knee, grovel, and conform to their world view that saying or implying that a 'biological male is a transgender woman' is 'hate speech' and a TOS violation. As stated, I can agree not to discuss a list of banned topics in r/conspiracy, but will not be bullied into saying this is 'hate speech' and disregarding human biology.
If they would have said, please refrain from discussing LGBTQ as it could subject the sub to reprisal from Admin, I would have honored the request.
Irrelevant. I am going to guess that you have seen it in your very long discussion with the r/conspiracy mods. I am not one of those people.
sure lol
I hope that was all of your questions; you sometimes leave out the question mark.
You dodged all the relevant questions so again...
I see no reason to further continue responding to you if you are going to evade my questions, gaslight me, and not engage in honest discussion.
Your long responses show that effort was spent and therefore out of respect for you I am responding back
Maybe just maybe I might actually get honest civil debate free of insults that answers questions without evasion or gaslighting.
despite your writing being full of poor logic and enough gratuitous transphobia for me to think you're trolling or crazy.
lol I guess it was too much to ask
Ironically, you seem to be trying to gaslight us.
Who would this us be, the mod team on another forum? I posted logs. I've been transparent.
To answer your question more directly: Firstly, in my opinion it is not on topic. Conspiracy forums are about conspiracies and not social commentary from South Park or your own personal crusades.
Biological males receiving women's awards and competing in women's sports is a conspiracy.
The LGBTQ lobby has positioned itself within social media and intimidated, bullied, threatened, and canceled anyone that might say that a biological male is a transgender woman or question whether CIS women feel disenfranchised by biological males receiving women's awards and competing in women's competitions.
Biological Women are being abused and treated unfairly
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFl88Wkz6eI
That was the essence of the South Park 'social commentary'. Joe Rogan has discussed this as have many other comedians and public commentators.
This topic is not going away so long as biological males identifying as women seek to enter women's competitions, receive women's awards, be permitted in women's locker rooms and bathrooms et. al.
https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1506359042838446083
https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1506641917299232771
I didn't dodge anything
sure lol
I hope you aren't still holding on to the delusion that I myself am actually a r/conspiracy moderator.
sure lol
What is the TOS violation? Is it because the topic is simply LGBTQ, and controversial? Is it reporting that USA Today gave Rachel Levine a women of the year award? Is it stating that Rachel Levine is a biological man identifying as a woman? Is it stating that transgender women are biological males? Is it asking if CIS women feel disenfranchised by a biological male receiving a woman's award? Is it by raising any question it might unintentionally raise awareness that the LGBTQ lobby have been repeatedly trying to erase and censor 200+ years of human biology, psychology, medicine, and the field of science itself? None of these topics or questions are 'hate speech' or inciting violence.
You are working with a group of people in an attempt to harm the r/conspiracy subreddit. We know this because you were caught trying to bait people into violating the Reddit Content Policy. It is not plausible that you have a psychological need to remind transgender people about how they were born and you believe that conspiracy forums are the place to do that. Now you are trying to harm the reputation of that subreddit. It would not surprise me if your responses in this thread were a group effort.
And more dodging lol
You really appear incapable of engaging in honest discussion.
To restate:
I did not incite anyone to hate or promote violence against transgender people.
Posting a picture of Biden Assistant HHS secretary Rachel Levine winning USA Today 'women of the year' award and in the submission statement politely raising the question asking if CIS women feel disenfranchised by biological males identifying as transgender women when permitted to compete in awards and sports competitions is not promoting hate or inciting violence.
That is called debate.
Biological males have XY chromosomes in their DNA and are born with male physical characteristics. You can't simply wish this away even if you call yourself a woman.
The argument is based on human biology.
Also to repeat
I really am getting the distinct impression you are a mod of r/conspiracy trolling here to defend running a honeypot while issuing perm bans using private blacklists for wrongthink.
I am no part of SPLC or TMOR, but your motives are fairly transparent here. Did you really think coming here anonymously to peddle the same nonsense and defend your actions was going to look convincing?
I repeatedly stated I was willing to post within a sandbox and asked for a list of banned topics in r/conspiracy to prevent further misunderstanding. Mods refused to answer.
I compromised and communicated that in the future I would not state in r/conspiracy that a 'biological male is a transgender woman'
That was not good enough for the mod. They wanted me to bend the knee, grovel, and conform to their world view that saying or implying that a 'biological male is a transgender woman' is 'hate speech' and a TOS violation. As stated, I can agree not to discuss a list of banned topics in r/conspiracy, but will not be bullied into saying this is 'hate speech' and disregarding human biology.
If they would have said, please refrain from discussing LGBTQ as it could subject the sub to reprisal from Admin, I would have honored the request.
Irrelevant. I am going to guess that you have seen it in your very long discussion with the r/conspiracy mods. I am not one of those people.
sure lol
I hope that was all of your questions; you sometimes leave out the question mark.
You dodged all the relevant questions so again...
I see no reason to further continue responding to you if you are going to evade my questions, gaslight me, and not engage in honest discussion.
Your long responses show that effort was spent and therefore out of respect for you I am responding back
Maybe just maybe I might actually get honest civil debate free of insults that answers questions without evasion or gaslighting.
despite your writing being full of poor logic and enough gratuitous transphobia for me to think you're trolling or crazy.
lol I guess it was too much to ask
Ironically, you seem to be trying to gaslight us.
Who would this us be, the mod team on another forum? I posted logs. I've been transparent.
To answer your question more directly: Firstly, in my opinion it is not on topic. Conspiracy forums are about conspiracies and not social commentary from South Park or your own personal crusades.
Biological males competing in women's sports is a conspiracy.
The LGBTQ lobby has positioned itself within social media and intimidated, bullied, threatened, and canceled anyone that might say that a biological male is a transgender woman or question whether CIS women feel disenfranchised by biological males receiving women's awards and competing in women's competitions.
Biological Women are being abused and treated unfairly
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFl88Wkz6eI
That was the essence of the South Park 'social commentary'. Joe Rogan has discussed this as have many other comedians and public commentators.
This topic is not going away so long as biological males identifying as women seek to enter women's competitions, receive women's awards, be permitted in women's locker rooms and bathrooms et. al.
https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1506359042838446083
https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1506641917299232771
I didn't dodge anything
sure lol
I hope you aren't still holding on to the delusion that I myself am actually a r/conspiracy moderator.
sure lol
What is the TOS violation? Is it because the topic is simply LGBTQ, and controversial? Is it reporting that USA Today gave Rachel Levine a women of the year award? Is it stating that Rachel Levine is a biological man identifying as a woman? Is it stating that transgender women are biological males? Is it asking if CIS women feel disenfranchised by a biological male receiving a woman's award? Is it by raising any question it might unintentionally raise awareness that the LGBTQ lobby have been repeatedly trying to erase and censor 200+ years of human biology, psychology, medicine, and the field of science itself? None of these topics or questions are 'hate speech' or inciting violence.
You are working with a group of people in an attempt to harm the r/conspiracy subreddit. We know this because you were caught trying to bait people into violating the Reddit Content Policy. It is not plausible that you have a psychological need to remind transgender people about how they were born and you believe that conspiracy forums are the place to do that. Now you are trying to harm the reputation of that subreddit. It would not surprise me if your responses in this thread were a group effort.
And more dodging lol
You really appear incapable of engaging in honest discussion.
To restate:
I did not incite anyone to hate or promote violence against transgender people.
Posting a picture of Biden Assistant HHS secretary Rachel Levine winning USA Today 'women of the year' award and in the submission statement politely raising the question asking if CIS women feel disenfranchised by biological males identifying as transgender women when permitted to compete in awards and sports competitions is not promoting hate or inciting violence.
That is called debate.
Biological males have XY chromosomes in their DNA and are born with male physical characteristics. You can't simply wish this away even if you call yourself a woman.
The argument is based on human biology.
Also to repeat
I really am getting the distinct impression you are a mod of r/conspiracy trolling here to defend running a honeypot while issuing perm bans using private blacklists for wrongthink.
I am no part of SPLC or TMOR, but your motives are fairly transparent here. Did you really think coming here anonymously to peddle the same nonsense and defend your actions was going to look convincing?
I repeatedly stated I was willing to post within a sandbox and asked for a list of banned topics in r/conspiracy to prevent further misunderstanding. Mods refused to answer.
I compromised and communicated that in the future I would not state in r/conspiracy that a 'biological male is a transgender woman'
That was not good enough for the mod. They wanted me to bend the knee, grovel, and conform to their world view that saying or implying that a 'biological male is a transgender woman' is 'hate speech' and a TOS violation. As stated, I can agree not to discuss a list of banned topics in r/conspiracy, but will not be bullied into saying this is 'hate speech' and disregarding human biology.
If they would have said, please refrain from discussing LGBTQ as it could subject the sub to reprisal from Admin, I would have honored the request.
Irrelevant. I am going to guess that you have seen it in your very long discussion with the r/conspiracy mods. I am not one of those people.
sure lol
I hope that was all of your questions; you sometimes leave out the question mark.
You dodged all the relevant questions so again...
I see no reason to further continue responding to you if you are going to evade my questions, gaslight me, and not engage in honest discussion.
Your long responses show that effort was spent and therefore out of respect for you I am responding back
Maybe just maybe I might actually get honest civil debate free of insults that answers questions without evasion or gaslighting.
despite your writing being full of poor logic and enough gratuitous transphobia for me to think you're trolling or crazy.
lol I guess it was too much to ask
Ironically, you seem to be trying to gaslight us.
Who would this us be, the mod team on another forum? I posted logs. I've been transparent.
To answer your question more directly: Firstly, in my opinion it is not on topic. Conspiracy forums are about conspiracies and not social commentary from South Park or your own personal crusades.
Biological males competing in women's sports is a conspiracy.
The LGBTQ lobby has positioned itself within social media and intimidated, bullied, threatened, and canceled anyone that might say that a biological male is a transgender woman or question whether CIS women feel disenfranchised by biological males receiving women's awards and competing in women's competitions.
Biological Women are being abused and treated unfairly
That was the essence of the South Park 'social commentary'. Joe Rogan has discussed this as have many other comedians and public commentators.
This topic is not going away so long as biological males identifying as women seek to enter women's competitions, receive women's awards, be permitted in women's locker rooms and bathrooms et. al.
https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1506359042838446083
https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1506641917299232771
I didn't dodge anything
sure lol
I hope you aren't still holding on to the delusion that I myself am actually a r/conspiracy moderator.
sure lol
What is the TOS violation? Is it because the topic is simply LGBTQ, and controversial? Is it reporting that USA Today gave Rachel Levine a women of the year award? Is it stating that Rachel Levine is a biological man identifying as a woman? Is it stating that transgender women are biological males? Is it asking if CIS women feel disenfranchised by a biological male receiving a woman's award? Is it by raising any question it might unintentionally raise awareness that the LGBTQ lobby have been repeatedly trying to erase and censor 200+ years of human biology, psychology, medicine, and the field of science itself? None of these topics or questions are 'hate speech' or inciting violence.
You are working with a group of people in an attempt to harm the r/conspiracy subreddit. We know this because you were caught trying to bait people into violating the Reddit Content Policy. It is not plausible that you have a psychological need to remind transgender people about how they were born and you believe that conspiracy forums are the place to do that. Now you are trying to harm the reputation of that subreddit. It would not surprise me if your responses in this thread were a group effort.
And more dodging lol
You really appear incapable of engaging in honest discussion.
To restate:
I did not incite anyone to hate or promote violence against transgender people.
Posting a picture of Biden Assistant HHS secretary Rachel Levine winning USA Today 'women of the year' award and in the submission statement politely raising the question asking if CIS women feel disenfranchised by biological males identifying as transgender women when permitted to compete in awards and sports competitions is not promoting hate or inciting violence.
That is called debate.
Biological males have XY chromosomes in their DNA and are born with male physical characteristics. You can't simply wish this away even if you call yourself a woman.
The argument is based on human biology.
Also to repeat
I really am getting the distinct impression you are a mod of r/conspiracy trolling here to defend running a honeypot while issuing perm bans using private blacklists for wrongthink.
I am no part of SPLC or TMOR, but your motives are fairly transparent here. Did you really think coming here anonymously to peddle the same nonsense and defend your actions was going to look convincing?
I repeatedly stated I was willing to post within a sandbox and asked for a list of banned topics in r/conspiracy to prevent further misunderstanding. Mods refused to answer.
I compromised and communicated that in the future I would not state in r/conspiracy that a 'biological male is a transgender woman'
That was not good enough for the mod. They wanted me to bend the knee, grovel, and conform to their world view that saying or implying that a 'biological male is a transgender woman' is 'hate speech' and a TOS violation. As stated, I can agree not to discuss a list of banned topics in r/conspiracy, but will not be bullied into saying this is 'hate speech' and disregarding human biology.
If they would have said, please refrain from discussing LGBTQ as it could subject the sub to reprisal from Admin, I would have honored the request.
Irrelevant. I am going to guess that you have seen it in your very long discussion with the r/conspiracy mods. I am not one of those people.
sure lol
I hope that was all of your questions; you sometimes leave out the question mark.
You dodged all the relevant questions so again...
I see no reason to further continue responding to you if you are going to evade my questions, gaslight me, and not engage in honest discussion.
Your long responses show that effort was spent and therefore out of respect for you I am responding back
Maybe just maybe I might actually get honest civil debate free of insults that answers questions without evasion or gaslighting.
despite your writing being full of poor logic and enough gratuitous transphobia for me to think you're trolling or crazy.
lol I guess it was too much to ask
Ironically, you seem to be trying to gaslight us.
Who would this us be, the mod team on another forum? I posted logs. I've been transparent.
To answer your question more directly: Firstly, in my opinion it is not on topic. Conspiracy forums are about conspiracies and not social commentary from South Park or your own personal crusades.
Biological males competing in women's sports is a conspiracy.
The LGBTQ lobby has positioned itself within social media and intimidated, bullied, threatened, and canceled anyone that might say that a biological male is a transgender woman or question whether CIS women feel disenfranchised by biological males receiving women's awards and competing in women's competitions.
Biological Women are being abused and treated unfairly
That was the essence of the South Park 'social commentary'. Joe Rogan has discussed this as have many other comedians and public commentators.
This topic is not going away so long as biological males identifying as women seek to enter women's competitions, receive women's awards, be permitted in women's locker rooms and bathrooms et. al.
https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1506359042838446083
https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1506641917299232771
I didn't dodge anything
sure lol
I hope you aren't still holding on to the delusion that I myself am actually a r/conspiracy moderator.
sure lol
What is the TOS violation? Is it because the topic is simply LGBTQ, and controversial? Is it reporting that USA Today gave Rachel Levine a women of the year award? Is it stating that Rachel Levine is a biological man identifying as a woman? Is it stating that transgender women are biological males? Is it asking if CIS women feel disenfranchised by a biological male receiving a woman's award? Is it by raising any question it might unintentionally raise awareness that the LGBTQ lobby have been repeatedly trying to erase and censor 200+ years of human biology, psychology, medicine, and the field of science itself? None of these topics or questions are 'hate speech' or inciting violence.
You are working with a group of people in an attempt to harm the r/conspiracy subreddit. We know this because you were caught trying to bait people into violating the Reddit Content Policy. It is not plausible that you have a psychological need to remind transgender people about how they were born and you believe that conspiracy forums are the place to do that. Now you are trying to harm the reputation of that subreddit. It would not surprise me if your responses in this thread were a group effort.
And more dodging lol
You really appear incapable of engaging in honest civil debate.
To restate
I did not incite anyone to hate or promote violence against transgender people.
Posting a picture of Biden Assistant HHS secretary Rachel Levine winning USA Today 'women of the year' award and in the submission statement politely raising the question asking if CIS women feel disenfranchised by biological males identifying as transgender women when permitted to compete in awards and sports competitions is not promoting hate or inciting violence.
That is called debate.
Biological males have XY chromosomes in their DNA and are born with male physical characteristics. You can't simply wish this away even if you call yourself a woman.
The argument is based on human biology.
Also to repeat
I really am getting the distinct impression you are a mod of r/conspiracy trolling here to defend running a honeypot while issuing perm bans using private blacklists for wrongthink.
I am no part of SPLC or TMOR, but your motives are fairly transparent here. Did you really think coming here anonymously to peddle the same nonsense and defend your actions was going to look convincing?
I repeatedly stated I was willing to post within a sandbox and asked for a list of banned topics in r/conspiracy to prevent further misunderstanding. Mods refused to answer.
I compromised and communicated that in the future I would not state in r/conspiracy that a 'biological male is a transgender woman'
That was not good enough for the mod. They wanted me to bend the knee, grovel, and conform to their world view that saying or implying that a 'biological male is a transgender woman' is 'hate speech' and a TOS violation. As stated, I can agree not to discuss a list of banned topics in r/conspiracy, but will not be bullied into saying this is 'hate speech' and disregarding human biology.
If they would have said, please refrain from discussing LGBTQ as it could subject the sub to reprisal from Admin, I would have honored the request.
Irrelevant. I am going to guess that you have seen it in your very long discussion with the r/conspiracy mods. I am not one of those people.
sure lol
I hope that was all of your questions; you sometimes leave out the question mark.
You dodged all the relevant questions so again...
I see no reason to further continue responding to you if you are going to evade my questions, gaslight me, and not engage in honest discussion.