The article is based, ignoring the risks presented by war. An obvious threat and a direct problem. Refugees are also going where? While resources relied on for mutal trade and reciprocal standing are directly threatened, presenting much larger global instability.

It doesn't mean I agree or disagree. What it does mean is that this article's rationality hasn't been calculated.

Russia also manufactures competing weapons. It is a global arms dealer. Tech has made its way to competing alliances.

Nobody sane wants WW3, does it mean let everyone do what they want. Wishful, because it would've been much easier, rather than any nukes, supposedly deterring. A huge risk.

Obviously that concern works both ways. They threaten each other. But it's not that dulled out article's naivety. Let Russia do what it wants, promising it's just another sheep, as it quickly turns into a bear.

The article is based, ignoring the risks presented by war. An obvious threat and a direct problem. Refugees are also going where? While resources relied on for mutal trade and reciprocal standing are directly threatened, presenting much larger global instability.

It doesn't mean I agree or disagree. What is does mean is that this article's rationality hasn't been calculated.

Russia also manufactures competing weapons. It is a global arms dealer. Tech has made its way to competing alliances.

Nobody sane wants WW3, does it mean let everyone do what they want. Wishful, because it would've been much easier, rather than any nukes, supposedly deterring. A huge risk.

Obviously that concern works both ways. They threaten each other. But it's not that dulled out article's naivety. Let Russia do what it wants, promising it's just another sheep, as it quickly turns into a bear.

The article is based, ignoring the risks presented by war. An obvious threat and a direct problem. Refugees are also going where? While resources relied on for mutal trade and reciprocal standing are directly threatened, presenting much larger global instability.

It doesn't mean I agree or disagree. What is does mean is that this article's rationality hasn't been calculated.

Russia also manufactures competing weapons. It is a global arms dealer. Tech has made its way to competing alliances.

Nobody sane wants WW3, does it mean let everyone do what they want. Wishful, because it would've been much easier, rather than any nukes, supposedly deterring. A huge risk.

The article is based, ignoring the risks presented by war. An obvious threat and a direct problem. Refugees are also going where? While resources relied on for mutal trade and reciprocal standing are directly threatened, presenting much larger global instability.

It doesn't mean I agree or disagree. What is does mean is that this article's rationality hasn't been calculated.

Russia also manufactures competing weapons. It is a global arms dealer. Tech has made its way to competing alliances.