Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

I actually had continued pm with the 'mods' over there which was likely just one head mod engaging in theater. Maybe I'll update the screenshot

Whomever is in charge over there appears to be compromised and probably controls the mod team. That's my take at least.

I have never seen such gaslighting and evasion over and over and over again. I was honest in my interaction, but not whomever was responding.

The mod claimed I violated TOS but would not state what was wrong with the submission or submission statement and repeatedly claimed I was trying to get the sub banned for simply asking what exactly was wrong in the submission or submission statement to justify the perm ban.

Asking for clarification results in more evasion, doublespeak, blame shifting and even more gaslighting.

Apparently the mods over there now operate on running private blacklists and banning for wrongthink. Any suggestion that the mods should ban topics publicly to allow users to post within open rules apparently makes you the equivalent of a TMOR shill that wants the sub to be banned.

It's completely backwards nonsense and suggests that mod team has been compromised.

The mod muted me for 28 days then finally implied that saying "biological male is a transgender woman" equals a TOS violation. By the mod replying it unintentionally lifted the 28 day mute.

I replied previously saying I was willing to post within a sandbox if I knew what were blacklisted topics to prevent any future misunderstanding.

With clarification I stated that while I disagree on human biology and scientific principle that it is a TOS violation, I can respect the mod request not to state "biological male is a transgender woman" if it prevents harm to the sub and to prevent any future misunderstanding

I then asked if discussion on all controversial LGBTQ topics were banned? no answer

If they were permitted then without stating that biological men are transgender women, can we discuss CIS women that may feel disenfranchised by transgender women in awards competitions or in women's sports. Again no answer.

My questions were intended to seek clarification so that I knew what the boundaries were for discussion.

I received another evasive response dodging questions.

If they had simply replied discussion on LGBTQ topics were banned then it's end of discussion, there is compromise and the rules are clear.

That's apparently too much to ask as I was muted again for 28 days while the mod gaslit me again.

Quite honestly someone over there has an agenda and it does not appear possible to appease whomever is in charge over there because they are probably already compromised.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I actually had continued pm with the 'mods' over there which was likely just one head mod engaging in theater. Maybe I'll update the screenshot

Whomever is in charge over there appears to be compromised and probably controls the mod team. That's my take at least.

I have never seen such gaslighting and evasion over and over and over again. I was honest in my interaction, but not whomever was responding.

The mod claimed I violated TOS but would not state what was wrong with the submission or submission statement and repeatedly claimed I was trying to get the sub banned for simply asking what exactly was wrong in the submission or submission statement to justify the perm ban.

Asking for clarification results in more evasion, doublespeak, blame shifting and even more gaslighting.

Apparently the mods over there now operate on running private blacklists and banning for wrongthink. Any suggestion that the mods should ban topics publicly to allow users to post within open rules apparently makes you the equivalent of a TMOR shill that wants the sub to be banned.

It's completely backwards nonsense and suggests that mod team has been compromised.

The mod muted me for 28 days then finally implied that saying "biological male is a transgender woman" equals a TOS violation. By the mod replying it unintentionally lifted the 28 day mute.

I replied previously saying I was willing to post within a sandbox if I knew what were blacklisted topics to prevent any future misunderstanding.

With clarification I stated that while I disagree on human biology and scientific principle that it is a TOS violation, I can respect the mod request not to state "biological male is a transgender woman" if it prevents harm to the sub and to prevent any future misunderstanding

I then asked if discussion on all controversial LGBTQ topics were banned? no answer If they were permitted then without stating that biological men are transgender women, can we discuss CIS women that may feel disenfranchised by transgender women in awards competitions or in women's sports. Again no answer.

My questions were intended to seek clarification so that I knew what the boundaries were for discussion.

If they had simply replied discussion on LGBTQ topics were banned then it's end of discussion, there is compromise and the rules are clear.

That's apparently too much to ask as I was muted again for 28 days while the mod gaslit me again.

Quite honestly someone over there has an agenda and it does not appear possible to appease whomever is in charge over there because they are probably already compromised.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I actually had continued pm with the 'mods' over there which was likely just one head mod engaging in theater. Maybe I'll update the screenshot

Whomever is in charge over there appears to be compromised and probably controls the mod team. That's my take at least.

I have never seen such gaslighting and evasion over and over and over again. I was honest in my interaction, but not whomever was responding.

The mod claimed I violated TOS but would not state what was wrong with the submission or submission statement and repeatedly claimed I was trying to get the sub banned for simply asking what exactly was wrong in the submission or submission statement to justify the perm ban.

Asking for clarification results in more evasion, doublespeak, blame shifting and even more gaslighting.

Apparently the mods over there now operate on running private blacklists and banning for wrongthink. Any suggestion that the mods should ban topics publicly to allow users to post within open rules apparently makes you the equivalent of a TMOR shill that wants the sub to be banned.

It's completely backwards nonsense and suggests that mod team has been compromised.

The mod muted me for 28 days then finally implied that saying "biological male is a transgender woman" equals a TOS violation. By the mod replying it unintentionally lifted the 28 mute.

I replied previously saying I was willing to post within a sandbox if I knew what were blacklisted topics to prevent any future misunderstanding.

With clarification I stated that while I disagree on human biology and scientific principle that it is a TOS violation, I can respect the mod request not to state "biological male is a transgender woman" if it prevents harm to the sub and to prevent any future misunderstanding

I then asked if discussion on all controversial LGBTQ topics were banned? no answer If they were permitted then without stating that biological men are transgender women, can we discuss CIS women that may feel disenfranchised by transgender women in awards competitions or in women's sports. Again no answer.

My questions were intended to seek clarification so that I knew what the boundaries were for discussion.

If they had simply replied discussion on LGBTQ topics were banned then it's end of discussion, there is compromise and the rules are clear.

That's apparently too much to ask as I was muted again for 28 days while the mod gaslit me again.

Quite honestly someone over there has an agenda and it does not appear possible to appease whomever is in charge over there because they are probably already compromised.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I actually had continued pm with the 'mods' over there which was likely just one head mod engaging in theater. Maybe I'll update the screenshot

Whomever is in charge over there appears to be compromised and probably controls the mod team. That's my take at least.

I have never seen such gaslighting and evasion over and over and over again. I was honest in my interaction, but not whomever was responding.

The mod claimed I violated TOS but would not state what was wrong with the submission or submission statement and repeatedly claimed I was trying to get the sub banned for simply asking what exactly was wrong in the submission or submission statement to justify the perm ban.

Asking for clarification results in more evasion, doublespeak, blame shifting and even more gaslighting.

Apparently the mods over there now operate on running private blacklists and banning for wrongthink. Any suggestion that the mods should ban topics publicly to allow users to post within open rules apparently makes you the equivalent of a TMOR shill that wants the sub to be banned.

It's completely backwards nonsense and suggests that mod team has been compromised.

The mod muted me for 28 days then finally implied that saying "biological male is a transgender woman" equals a TOS violation. By the mod replying it unintentionally lifted the 28 mute.

I replied previously saying I was willing to post within a sandbox if I knew what were blacklisted topics to prevent any future misunderstanding.

With clarification I stated that while I disagree on human biology and scientific principle that it is a TOS violation, I can respect the mod request not to state "biological male is a transgender woman" if it prevents harm to the sub and to prevent any future misunderstanding

I then asked if discussion on all controversial LGBTQ topics were banned? no answer

If they were permitted then without stating that biological men are transgender women, can we discuss CIS women that may feel disenfranchised by transgender women in awards competitions or in women's sports. Again no answer.

My questions were intended to seek clarification so that I knew what the boundaries were for discussion.

Quite honestly someone over there has an agenda and it does not appear possible to appease whomever is in charge over there because they are probably already compromised.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

I actually had continued pm with the 'mods' over there which was likely just one head mod. Maybe I'll update the screenshot

Whomever is in charge over there appears to be compromised and probably controls the mod team. That's my take at least.

I have never seen such gaslighting and evasion over and over and over again. I was honest in my interaction, but not whomever was responding.

The mod claimed I violated TOS but would not state what was wrong with the submission or submission statement and repeatedly claimed I was trying to get the sub banned for simply asking what exactly was wrong in the submission or submission statement to justify the perm ban.

Asking for clarification results in more evasion, doublespeak, and even more gaslighting.

Apparently the mods over there now operate on running private blacklists and banning for wrongthink. Any suggestion that the mods should ban topics publicly to allow users to post within open rules apparently makes you the equivalent of a TMOR shill that wants the sub to be banned.

It's completely backwards nonsense and suggests that mod team has been compromised.

The mod muted me for 28 days then finally implied that saying "biological male is a transgender woman" equals a TOS violation. By the mod replying it unintentionally lifted the 28 mute.

I replied previously saying I was willing to post within a sandbox if I knew what were blacklisted topics to prevent any future misunderstanding.

With clarification I stated that while I disagree on human biology and scientific principle, I can respect the mod request if it prevents harm to the sub and to prevent a ban.

I then asked if all controversial LGBTQ topics were banned? no answer

If they were permitted then without stating that biological men are transgender women, can we discuss CIS women that may feel disenfranchised by transgender women in awards competitions or in women's sports. Again no answer.

My questions were intended to seek clarification so that I knew what the boundaries were for discussion.

Quite honestly someone over there has an agenda and it does not appear possible to appease whomever is in charge over there because they are probably already compromised.

2 years ago
1 score