Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

No. Petrol didn't warm the planet. Mass population booms did. What is it, in any event. Conjecture. It could it might. It should. It will. Guesswork.

But the planet is on a cycle. Where shit happens, it would always occur in any event. Despite being sped up by dumb people and their greed.

You're one of those who buys EVs. Thinking they aren't another generic con. They don't fix climate change, they increase it. They fail in climate. They cost x3 more resources. The only strategy behind them is energy independence. A failed strategy, when the products are still made from oil and gas, and electric planes run out of charge before they get there. But they're the next model a railway mogul can charge double for. Everything on the same source how much does that increase in cost. Hyperinflation. Renewables have lobbied the weather. Absurdly.

But the greatest concern is the population exploding. There isn't a solution for. Neither is there a strategy for a cycle occurring when it is conjecture on what actually occurs. It definitely isn't buy more shit before you die. You'll die anyway. It's simply about profits. Not that they can do shit about it. Why would they, except profit first. Worse case they could survive underground indefinitely without a population of assholes. Best case it is just a blimp, a hot spell, then a cold spell, sooner.

I am obviously being shadowbanned?

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

No. Petrol didn't warm the planet. Mass population booms did. What is it, in any event. Conjecture. It could it might. It should. It will. Guesswork.

But the planet is on a cycle. Where shit happens, it would always occur in any event. Despite being sped up by dumb people and their greed.

You're one of those who buys EVs. Thinking they aren't another generic con. They don't fix climate change, they increase it. They fail in climate. They cost x3 more resources. The only strategy behind them is energy independence. A failed strategy, when the products are still made from oil and gas, and electric planes run out of charge before they get there. But they're the next model a railway mogul can charge double for. Everything on the same source how much does that increase in cost. Hyperinflation. Renewables have lobbied the weather. Absurdly.

But the greatest concern is the population exploding. There isn't a solution for. Neither is there a strategy for a cycle occurring when it is conjecture on what actually occurs. It definitely isn't buy more shit before you die. You'll die anyway. It's simply about profits. Not that they can do shit about it. Why would they, except profit first. Worse case they could survive underground indefinitely without a population of assholes. Best case it is just a blimp, a hot spell, then a cold spell, sooner.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

No. Petrol didn't warm the planet. Mass population booms did. What is it, in any event. Conjecture. It could it might. It should. It will. Guesswork.

But the planet is on a cycle. Where shit happens, it would always occur in any event. Despite being sped up by dumb people and their greed.

You're one of those who buys EVs. Thinking they aren't another generic con. They don't fix climate change, they increase it. They fail in climate. They cost x3 more resources. The only strategy behind them is energy independence. A failed strategy, when the products are still made from oil and gas, and electric planes run out of charge before they get there. But they're the next model a railway mogul can charge double for. Everything on the same source how much does that increase in cost. Hyperinflation. Renewables have lobbied the weather. Absurdly.

But the greatest concern is the population exploding. There isn't a solution for. Neither is there a strategy for a cycle occurring ehen it is conjecture on what actually occurs. It definitely isn't buy more shit before you die. You'll die anyway. It's simply about profits. Not that they can do shit about it. Why would they, except profit first. Worse case they could survive underground indefinitely without a population of assholes. Best case it just a blimp, a hot spell, then a cold spell, sooner.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

No. Petrol didn't warm the planet. Mass population booms did. What is it, in any event.

But the planet is on a cycle. Where shit happens, it would always occur in any event. Despite being sped up by dumb people and their greed.

You're one of those who buys EVs. Thinking they aren't another generic con. They don't fix climate change, they increase it. They fail in climate. They cost x3 more resources. The only strategy behind them is energy independence. A failed strategy, when the products are still made from oil and gas, and electric planes run out of charge before they get there. But they're the next model a railway mogul can charge double for. Everything on the same source how much does that increase in cost. Hyperinflation. Renewables have lobbied the weather. Absurdly.

But the greatest concern is the population exploding. There isn't a solution for. Neither is there a strategy for a cycle occurring it is conjecture on what occurs. It definitely isn't buy more shit before you die. You'll die anyway.

2 years ago
1 score