Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

I agree. But look at places with national service. For any real argument.

The argument then becomes. What does it improve. Almost all of both Britain and America and Europe were nationalised then. A utopia in comparison to today. Public services like transport, infrastructure, manufacture, perhaps healthcare, housing was affordable and were nationalised, working better than they do now. We have lots of services that have saturated increasing inflation and constant taxation. Taxation is funnelling abroad, often into investment of returning even more refugees. The more migration the greater the economy. Except fucko, no, take Britain it was number one in the 60s then it swamped in the 70s. Education wasn't get your degree in wokism either, or some other fictional farts and crafts of nonsense producing another stereotype from God forbid. It was mostly better for all, instead of creating obesity and increasing crime. Wealth was spread out. Boomers as a result were wealthier than the later generations, apart from its decreasing assholes of today.

Your entire speal against is quite mistaken. You're focused on war and not improving it. Omg take any marching orders. Without realising everybody is singing the same tune. Instead of this, what is this today?

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I agree. But look at places with national service. For any real argument.

The argument then becomes. What does it improve. Almost all of both Britain and America and Europe were nationalised then. A utopia in comparison to today. Public services like transport, infrastructure, manufacture, perhaps healthcare, housing was affordable and were nationalised, working better than they do now. We have lots of services that have saturated increasing inflation and constant taxation. Taxation is funnelling abroad, often into investment of returning even more refugees. The more migration the greater the economy. Except fucko, no take Britain it was number one in the 60s then it swamped in the 70s. Education wasn't get your degree in wokism either, or some other fictional farts and crafts of nonsense producing another stereotype from God forbid. It was mostly better for all, instead of creating obesity and increasing crime. Wealth was spread out. Boomers as a result were wealthier than the later generations, apart from its decreasing assholes today.

Your entire speal against is quite mistaken. You're focused on war and not improving it. Omg take any marching orders. Without realising everybody is singing the same tune. Instead of this, what is this today?

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I agree. But look at places with national service. For any real argument.

The argument then becomes. What does it improve. Almost all of both Britain and America and Europe were nationalised then. A utopia in comparison to today. Public services like transport, infrastructure, manufacture, perhaps healthcare, housing was affordable and were nationalised, working better than they do now. We have lots of services that have saturated increasing inflation and constant taxation. Taxation is funnelling abroad, often into investment of returning even more refugees. The more migration the greater the economy. Except fucko, no take Britain it was number one in the 60s then it swamped in the 70s. Education wasn't get your degree in wokism either, or some other fictional farts and crafts of nonsense producing another stereotype from God forbid. It was mostly better for all, instead of creating obesity and increasing crime. Wealth was spread out. Boomers as a result were wealthier than the later generations, apart from its decreasing assholes today.

Your entire speal against is quite mistaken. You're focused on war and not improving it.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

I agree. But look at places with national service. For any real argument.

The argument then becomes. What does it improve. Almost all of both Britain and America and Europe were nationalised then. A utopia in comparison to today. Public services like transport, infrastructure, manufacture, housing was affordable and were nationalised, working better than they do now. We have lots of services that have saturated increasing inflation and constant taxation. Taxation is funnelling abroad into investment of returning even more refugees. The more migration the greater the economy. Except fucko, no take Britain it was number one in the 60s then it swamped in the 70s. Education wasn't get your degree in wokism either, or some other fictional farts and crafts of nonsense producing another stereotype from God forbid. It was better for all instead of creating obesity and increasing crime. Wealth was spread out. Boomers as a result were wealthier than the later generations, apart from its decreasing assholes.

Your entire speal against is quite mistaken.

2 years ago
1 score