Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

If anybody bothers to go through these lists of "studies," you'll find they don't actually say what the op claims they say or they are completely bogus. I've done this several times. It's a rabbit hole. You debunk, they pop up with another one. I'd be willing to bet there is no legitimate study that finds:

a) vaccines are more dangerous than the virus itself b) the virus doesn't exist c) the virus is a bioweapon d) ivermectin is effective vs COVID in dosages safe for humans e) the virus is no more dangerous than the flu

I can see right now just from a title on one in the "continued" part here just below where I am typing:

On COVID vaccines: why they cannot work, and irrefutable evidence of their causative role in deaths after vaccination PDF

I can already guess the fallacies. First and foremost, confusing correlation with causation. That some people die after receiving the vaccine is not proof that the vaccine was the cause of the death. When hundreds of millions get vaccinated, many of them elderly, there will be thousands of people who die after receiving the vaccine. On the other hand, 800,000 people have died while having COVID from symptoms directly caused by COVID.

It's all bogus. Use your rationality and don't follow these false leads.

EDIT: Yep. Just as I expected. The very first study I looked at, selected by random placement (happened t be the first listed on the post directly below where I type, lists 15 deaths, most of them older (average age is 70, only one was below the age of 50). Time of death after vaccine ranged from 7 days to 6 months with two listed as "unknown."

So this "irrefutable proof" has cherry-picked 15 cases of mostly elderly people dying up to 6 months after receiving the vaccine, out of a total of (what?) 200 million people?

Come one, please understand the math here. This is completely absurd. It's literally embarrassing that the OP thinks this should be included in a list and presented as "irrefutable evidence." There isn't even a hypothesis presented, let alone tested, as to how the vaccine caused these deaths.

Please. Use logic and common sense. Stop believing these bogus lists. I could go down all of them. What 3 studies here are the absolute best? One million bogus studies won't trump even 1 gold standard study. Tell me what 3 are the best?

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

If anybody bothers to go through these lists of "studies," you'll find they don't actually say what the op claims they say or they are completely bogus. I've done this several times. It's a rabbit hole. You debunk, they pop up with another one. I'd be willing to bet there is no legitimate study that finds:

a) vaccines are more dangerous than the virus itself b) the virus doesn't exist c) the virus is a bioweapon d) ivermectin is effective vs COVID in dosages safe for humans e) the virus is no more dangerous than the flu

I can see right now just from a title on one in the "continued" part here just below where I am typing:

On COVID vaccines: why they cannot work, and irrefutable evidence of their causative role in deaths after vaccination PDF

I can already guess the fallacies. First and foremost, confusing correlation with causation. That some people die after receiving the vaccine is not proof that the vaccine was the cause of the death. When hundreds of millions get vaccinated, many of them elderly, there will be thousands of people who die after receiving the vaccine. On the other hand, 800,000 people have died while having COVID from symptoms directly caused by COVID.

It's all bogus. Use your rationality and don't follow these false leads.

2 years ago
1 score