Men do many things in secret.

But that not a case in virology. If virologist does not share its work - that means it 100% have something to hide.

Even researchers from Wuhan and US openly published their papers on creating coronaviruses potentially harmful for humans. So, the paper of isolation would had been published too, if it exists.

There is no any logic in openly publishing papers on creation of virus and then hide the paper of its replication and purification, except the only case when the created virus does not work as expected, i.e. can't replicate.

I think immediately hidden.

Publication of virus isolation (real, scientific isolation, not that messing with dead cells soup and unsuitable PCR tests they try to pose as "isolation" for that very specific SARS-CoV-2) paper is a routine, obvious and nearly mandatory thing in world of virology. Even for completely harmless ones. And if for very specific and posed as very dangerous for all humanity virus it was not done immidiately, it is 100% proof that there is a hoax. Either virus does not exist at all, either it does not have declared properties.

In any case, "traditional vaccine" is not possible.

In Russia, one vaccine posed as traditional vaccine (CoviVac) was rolled out on the vaxx hoax wave. Many people agreed to take that traditional vaccine, but it was nearly impossible to find it. However, some people was "lucky" and got that shots. It was a great scandal, when revealed, that in state database of jabbed, all that people who thought that they got a traditional vaccine jab was clearly marked as receinved shitty "vector vaccine" SputnikV (AstraZeneca). Nowdays, that "traditional" CoviVac is discontinued under the reason of "low demand", which is partially true, because nobody who may had agreed to be jabbed with traditional vaccine want to be jabbed with that vector shit.

Men do many things in secret.

But that not a case in virology. If virologist does not share its work - that means it 100% have something to hide.

I think immediately hidden.

Publication of virus isolation (real, scientific isolation, not that messing with dead cells soup and unsuitable PCR tests they try to pose as "isolation" for that very specific SARS-CoV-2) paper is a routine, obvious and nearly mandatory thing in world of virology. Even for completely harmless ones. And if for very specific and posed as very dangerous for all humanity virus it was not done immidiately, it is 100% proof that there is a hoax. Either virus does not exist at all, either it does not have declared properties.

In any case, "traditional vaccine" is not possible.

In Russia, one vaccine posed as traditional vaccine (CoviVac) was rolled out on the vaxx hoax wave. Many people agreed to take that traditional vaccine, but it was nearly impossible to find it. However, some people was "lucky" and got that shots. It was a great scandal, when revealed, that in state database of jabbed, all that people who thought that they got a traditional vaccine jab was clearly marked as receinved shitty "vector vaccine" SputnikV (AstraZeneca). Nowdays, that "traditional" CoviVac is discontinued under the reason of "low demand", which is partially true, because nobody who may had agreed to be jabbed with traditional vaccine want to be jabbed with that vector shit.