Someone needs to run a test using these groups of volunteers:

1. unvaxed people. 2, One group each of sets of people each with one vax type. Pfizer, Moderna, J&J. None with second jabs. 3. Repeat of new group of #2 this time including known vaxed with second jab. The best testing should be done with Bluetooth-specific lab test equipment and not just cell phones. That would eliminate the chance of phone operating systems messing with the connection type.

If this ends up showing that vaxed people respond to Bluetooth queries but non vaxed don't, that is enough evidence to justify calling for a formal investigation.

There is NO reason for a vaccinated person's body to be responding to Bluetooth near-field communications. More, even if graphene oxide responds to radio signals, it is very unlikely injected graphene oxide would normally respond with Bluetooth codes.

This is suspicious as hell. I could imagine a usage case where the ID could be used to selectively activate individuals' brain sections through adjuvants that passed through the blood-brain barrier and latched onto neurons. Then 5G-beamed signals might be sendable to specific people for god knows what reasons.

Someone needs to run a test using these groups of volunteers:

1. unvaxed people. 2, One group each of sets of people each with one vax type. Pfizer, Moderna, J&J. None with second jabs. 3. Repeat of new group of #2 this time including known vaxed with second jab. If this ends up showing that vaxed people resond to Bluetooth quries but non vaxed don't, that is enough evidence to justify calling for a formal investigation.

There is NO reason for a vaccinated person's body to be responding to Bluetooth near-field communications. More, even if graphene oxide responds to radio signals, it is very unlikely injected graphene oxide would normally respond with Bluetooth codes.

This is suspicious as hell.