Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

The biggest redpill from flat Earth research is how many of you people don't know that

LATITUDE and LONGITUDE will ONLY WORK

on a

1)SPHERICAL OBJECT

of

2)PRECISELY the INVARIANT DIAMETER of this SPHERICAL planet.

''The only evidence'' here

is that

NOBODY ever TAUGHT YOU how LONGITUDE and LATITUDE WORK.

And that nobody ever explained to you that all you need is a VERY low dollar telescope to SEE WHERE SHADOWS APPEAR on THINGS around us.

The level of ignorance you have to have

to NOT EVEN KNOW THERE ARE WAYS to CHECK your story, is PROFOUND.

GET an EDUCATION in PRINCIPLES around instrumentation.

Stop saying stupid things, that the SHADOWS on various objects around us prove to be COMPLETELY without first intelligent thought.

When ''WuhL Gawlee, If thim suns was moving, thim shadows woodn' nevur be no diffurnt on NUTHIN caws YEW JIST CUDD'N TAYLE, thair jist ain't no waye,''

is your answer

YOU'RE the oblivious one in the room with ZERO time warming a seat in ANY kind of instrumentation, or systems analysis, or even basic navigation.

SHADOWS DON'T ACT THE SAME with a CENTRAL

NON MOVING STAR

as if the STAR is MOVING.

The shadow/light motions, and the angles involved on EVERYTHING

will be different.

2 years ago
-3 score
Reason: None provided.

The biggest redpill from flat Earth research is how many of you people don't know that

LATITUDE and LONGITUDE will ONLY WORK

on a

1)SPHERICAL OBJECT

of

2)PRECISELY the INVARIANT DIAMETER of this SPHERICAL planet.

''The only evidence'' here

is that

NOBODY ever TAUGHT YOU how LONGITUDE and LATITUDE WORK.

And that nobody ever explained to you that all you need is a VERY low dollar telescope to SEE WHERE SHADOWS APPEAR on THINGS around us.

The level of ignorance you have to have

to NOT EVEN KNOW THERE ARE WAYS to CHECK your story, is PROFOUND.

GET an EDUCATION in PRINCIPLES around instrumentation.

Stop saying stupid things, that the SHADOWS on various objects around us prove to be COMPLETELY without first intelligent thought.

When ''WuhL Gawlee, If thim suns was moving, thim shadows woodn' nevur be no diffurnt on NUTHIN caws YEW JIST CUDD'N TAYLE, thair jist ain't no waye,''

is your answer

YOU'RE the oblivious one in the room with ZERO time warming a seat in ANY kind of instrumentation, or systems analysis, or even basic navigation.

SHADOWS DON'T ACT THE SAME with a CENTRAL

NON MOVING STAR

as if the STAR is MOVING.

The shadow/light motion on EVERYTHING will be different.

2 years ago
-3 score
Reason: None provided.

The biggest redpill from flat Earth research is how many of you people don't know that

LATITUDE and LONGITUDE will ONLY WORK

on a

1)SPHERICAL OBJECT

of

2)PRECISELY the INVARIANT DIAMETER of this SPHERICAL planet.

''The only evidence'' here

is that

NOBODY ever TAUGHT YOU how LONGITUDE and LATITUDE WORK.

And that nobody ever explained to you that all you need is a VERY low dollar telescope to SEE WHERE SHADOWS APPEAR on THINGS around us.

The level of ignorance you have to have

to NOT EVEN KNOW THERE ARE WAYS to CHECK your story, is PROFOUND.

GET an EDUCATION in PRINCIPLES around instrumentation.

Stop saying stupid things, that the SHADOWS on various objects around us prove to be COMPLETELY without first intelligent thought.

When ''WuhL Gawlee, If thim suns was moving, thim shadows woodn' nevur be no diffurnt on NUTHIN caws YEW JIST CUDD'N TAYLE, thair jist ain't no waye,''

is your answer

YOU'RE the oblivious one in the room with ZERO time warming a seat in ANY kind of instrumentation, or systems analysis, or even basic navigation.

SHADOWS DON'T ACT THE SAME with a CENTRAL

NON MOVING STAR

as if the STAR is MOVING.

The shadow/light motion evolution on EVERYTHING would be different.

2 years ago
-3 score
Reason: None provided.

The biggest redpill from flat Earth research is how many of you people don't know that

LATITUDE and LONGITUDE will ONLY WORK

on a

1)SPHERICAL OBJECT

of

2)PRECISELY the INVARIANT DIAMETER of this SPHERICAL planet.

''The only evidence'' here

is that

NOBODY ever TAUGHT YOU how LONGITUDE and LATITUDE WORK.

And that nobody ever explained to you that all you need is a VERY low dollar telescope to SEE WHERE SHADOWS APPEAR on THINGS around us.

The level of ignorance you have to have to NOT EVEN KNOW THERE ARE WAYS to CHECK your story, is PROFOUND.

GET an EDUCATION in PRINCIPLES around instrumentation. Stop saying stupid shit that the SHADOWS on various objects around us prove to be COMPLETELY without first intelligent thought.

When ''WuhL Gawlee, If thim suns was moving, thim shadows woodn' nevur be no diffurnt on NUTHIN caws YEW JIST CUDD'N TAYLE, thair jist ain't no waye,''

is your answer

YOU'RE the oblivious one in the room with ZERO time shadowing a seat in ANY kind of instrumentation, or systems analysis.

SHADOWS DON'T ACT THE SAME with a CENTRAL

NON MOVING STAR

as if the STAR is MOVING.

The shadow/light motion evolution on EVERYTHING would be different.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

The biggest redpill from flat Earth research is how many of you people don't know that

LATITUDE and LONGITUDE will ONLY WORK

on a

1)SPHERICAL OBJECT

of

2)PRECISELY the INVARIANT DIAMETER of this SPHERICAL planet.

''The only evidence'' here

is that

NOBODY ever TAUGHT YOU how LONGITUDE and LATITUDE WORK.

2 years ago
1 score