This is actually good for science. The consensus oriented, publish or perish cultured, funding-seeking, Institution of Science(TM) today actually gets in the way of breakthroughs (one recent example: https://www.reuters.com/article/nobel-chemistry-idUSL5E7L51U620111005)

You'd think mathematics was safe from this attitude since they are the most careful about assumptions. But nope. Look at what was done to Georg Cantor.

This is actually good for science. The consensus oriented, publish or perish cultured, funding-seeking, Institution of Science(TM) today actually gets in the way of breakthroughs (one recent example: https://www.reuters.com/article/nobel-chemistry-idUSL5E7L51U620111005)

You'd think mathematics was safe from this attitude since they are the most careful about assumptions. But nope. Look at what was done to Georg Cantor.

This is actually good for science. The consensus oriented, publish or perish cultured, funding-seeking, Institution of Science^TM^ today actually gets in the way of breakthroughs (one recent example: https://www.reuters.com/article/nobel-chemistry-idUSL5E7L51U620111005)

You'd think mathematics was safe from this attitude since they are the most careful about assumptions. But nope. Look at what was done to Georg Cantor.