If you said it is a self growing crystal (that happens to look like a parasite), I'd have an easier time believing that.

This could be the new flat earth theory they're peddling out to discredit conspiracy theorists again.

As I said once, we shouldn't have to fall into the trap of trying to prove the vaccine has graphene/parasites etc. The burden of proof is on them to prove the vaccine is safe, and the data shows it's not. That's enough to recall the vaccines (others have been recalled for far less damage). We shouldn't have to prove anything else, that's just allowing them to shift the goal posts.

What's a better strategy for winning people to your side? Talking against COVID vaccines and mandates because of adverse effects and not being treated as a human without it, or talking against them because they have aluminium based lifeforms that eat graphene?

If you said it is a self growing crystal (that happens to look like a parasite), I'd have an easier time believing that.

This could be the new flat earth theory they're peddling out to discredit conspiracy theorists again.

As I said once, we shouldn't have to fall into the trap of trying to prove the vaccine has graphene/parasites etc. The burden of proof is on them to prove the vaccine is safe, and the data shows it's not. That's enough to recall the vaccines (others have been recalled for far less damage). We shouldn't have to prove anything else, that's just allowing them to shift the goal posts.

What's a better strategy for winning people to your side? Talking against COVID vaccines and mandates because of adverse effects and not being treated as a human without it, or talking against them because they have aluminium based lifeforms that eat graphene?

If you said it is a self growing crystal (that happens to look like a parasite), I'd have an easier time believing that.

This could be the new flat earth theory they're peddling out to discredit conspiracy theorists again.

As I said once, we shouldn't have to fall into the trap of trying to prove the vaccine has graphene/parasites etc. The burden of proof is on them to prove the vaccine is safe, and the data shows it's not. That's enough to recall the vaccines (others have been recalled for far less damage). We shouldn't have to prove anything else, that's just allowing them to shift the goal posts.

What's a better strategy for winning people to your side? Talking against COVID vaccines and mandates because of adverse effects and not being treated as a human without it, or talking against them because they have aluminium based lifeforms that eat graphene?

If you said it is a self growing crystal (that happens to look like a parasite), I'd have an easier time believing that.

This could be the new flat earth theory they're peddling out to discredit conspiracy theorists again.

As I said once, we shouldn't have to fall into the trap of trying to prove the vaccine has graphene/parasites etc. The burden of proof is on them to prove the vaccine is safe, and the data shows it's not. That's enough to recall the vaccines (others have been recalled for far less damage). We shouldn't have to prove anything else, that's just allowing them to shift the goal posts.

What's a better strategy for winning people to your side? Talking against COVID vaccines because of adverse effects, or talking against them because they have aluminium based lifeforms that eat graphene?

If you said it is a self growing crystal (that happens to look like a parasite), I'd have an easier time believing that.

This could be the new flat earth theory they're peddling out to discredit conspiracy theorists again.

As I said once, we shouldn't have to fall into the trap of trying to prove the vaccine has graphene/parasites etc. The burden of proof is on them to prove the vaccine is safe, and the data shows it's not. That's enough to recall the vaccines (others have been recalled for far less damage). We shouldn't have to prove anything else, that's just allowing them to shift the goal posts.

What a better strategy for winning people to your side? Talking against COVID vaccines because of adverse effects, or talking against them because they have aluminium based lifeforms that eat graphene?

If you said it is a self growing crystal (that happens to look like a parasite), I'd have an easier time believing that.

This could be the new flat earth theory they're peddling out to discredit conspiracy theorists again.

As I said once, we shouldn't have to fall into the trap of trying to prove the vaccine has graphene/parasites etc. It's their job to prove the vaccine is safe, and the data shows it's not. That's enough to recall the vaccines (others have been recalled for far less damage). We shouldn't have to prove anything else, that's just allowing them to shift the goal posts.

What a better strategy for winning people to your side? Talking against COVID vaccines because of adverse effects, or talking against them because they have aluminium based lifeforms that eat graphene?

If you said it is a self growing crystal (that happens to look like a parasite), I'd have an easier time believing that.

This could be the new flat earth theory they're peddling out to discredit conspiracy theorists again.

As I said once, we shouldn't have to fall into the trap of trying to prove the vaccine has graphene/parasites etc. It's their job to prove the vaccine is safe, and the data shows it's not. That's enough to recall the vaccines (others have been recalled for far less damage). We shouldn't have to prove anything else, that's just allowing them to shift the goal posts.

If you said it is a self growing crystal (that happens to look like a parasite), I'd have an easier time believing that.

This could be the new flat earth theory they're peddling out to discredit conspiracy theorists again.

As I said once, we shouldn't have to fall into the trap of trying to prove the vaccine has graphene/parasites etc. It's their job to prove the vaccine is safe, and the data shows it's not. That's enough to recall them. We shouldn't have to prove anything, that's just allowing them to shift the goal posts.

If you said it is a self growing crystal (that happens to look like a parasite), I'd have an easier time believing that.

This could be the new flat earth theory they're peddling out to discredit conspiracy theorists again. As I said once, we shouldn't have to fall into the trap of trying to prove the vaccine has graphene/parasites etc. It's their job to prove the vaccine is safe, and the data shows it's not. That's enough to recall them. We shouldn't have to prove all this.

If you said it is a self growing crystal (that happens to look like a parasite), I'd have an easier time believing that.

This could be the new flat earth theory they're peddling out to discredit conspiracy theorists again.

If you said it is a self growing crystal (that happens to look like a parasite), I'd have an easier time believing that.

It could be the new flat earth theory they're peddling out to discredit conspiracy theorists again. I remember that calling those questioning the vaccines as flat earthers became a popular insult after 2020.

Uh I'm not sure about that. If you said it is a self growing crystal (that happens to look like a parasite), I could maybe believe that.