Why don't you FUCKING READ THE PAPER yourself:
" did not present with any COVID-19-specific symptoms, he tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 before he died."
"On day 25, our patient tested SARS-CoV-2 positive by real-time PCR (RT-PCR), with a low cycle threshold (Ct) value indicating high virus load"
"the patient became infected from the patient in his hospital room"
"Both the Ct value measured in nasopharyngeal swab and values measured in formalin-fixed paraffinembedded autopsy specimens indicate viral load and suggest transmissibility"
"immunization against SARS-CoV-2 by vaccination appeared to reduce the severity of pathogenesis, especially with regard to severe lung disease, while viral RNA persisted in nasal swabs"
How many times do they have to spell it for you?
Typical people of today ,expect everything to be spoonfed to them by others.
Learn to fucking apply yourself.
They are blaming it on COVID-19 AND blaming that the BNT162b2 vaccine is not effective enough in protecting from death nor sterilizing against infection/transmission.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8051011/
Regardless, the paper is still crap as I stated above: wrong gene targets RNA-dependent RNA polymeras (Target 1) and nucleopeptide (Target 2) (bad SARS-CoV-2 kit, there are over 40 available), too high Ct for sampling of pathological samples,
Why don't you FUCKING READ THE PAPER yourself:
" did not present with any COVID-19-specific symptoms, he tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 before he died."
"On day 25, our patient tested SARS-CoV-2 positive by real-time PCR (RT-PCR), with a low cycle threshold (Ct) value indicating high virus load"
"the patient became infected from the patient in his hospital room"
How many times do they have to spell it for you?
Typical people of today ,expect everything to be spoonfed to them by others.
Learn to fucking apply yourself.