Sorry, I don't mean to be rude, but what do you want from me?

Regarding your points I seem to be able to address:

1. How I get "nothing to see here" from your post is that you didn't build upon any of the bullet points and you didn't ask any questions. It was as if the list of bullet points and conspiracy claim meant nothing to you. Any more questions?

2. Regarding calling you to a different thread. I wouldn't claim to have called you to action. Instead, I would say that your matter of fact insinuation that a patron of the shared-ledger concept is "on their own" with less protections than the "evil" banks provide was not the intention of Satoshi. This point would be evidenced if Satoshi's prior writings had not been systematically deleted and "forgotted" [sic] from the internet. If you don't believe me via extrapolation or based on the work built upon what we do have remaining from Satoshi, I'd be happy to brainstorm with you solutions to the problem you matter-of-factly bestowed upon all cryptocurrency users.

Long story short: the concept of a shared ledger extends beyond Proof of Work, and can include various relations such as contact networks, timestamp/transaction order, reputation, content, DNA, human fingerprints, digital fingerprints, contact tracing, digital contracts, etc. There's more than one way to skin a block. Edit: I feel like I didn't write the following: Long story short shorter: the blockchain concept can be used to reliably secure money in a seamless user-friendly way.

I would have said blockchain can be used to reliably secure information, property, people and events.

Sorry, I don't mean to be rude, but what do you want from me?

Regarding your points I seem to be able to address:

1. How I get "nothing to see here" from your post is that you didn't build upon any of the bullet points and you didn't ask any questions. It was as if the list of bullet points and conspiracy claim meant nothing to you. Any more questions?

2. Regarding calling you to a different thread. I wouldn't claim to have called you to action. Instead, I would say that your matter of fact insinuation that a patron of the shared-ledger concept is "on their own" with less protections than the "evil" banks provide was not the intention of Satoshi. This point would be evidenced if Satoshi's prior writings had not been systematically deleted and "forgotted" [sic] from the internet. If you don't believe me via extrapolation or based on the work built upon what we do have remaining from Satoshi, I'd be happy to brainstorm with you solutions to the problem you matter-of-factly bestowed upon all cryptocurrency users.

Long story short: the concept of a shared ledger extends beyond Proof of Work, and can include various relations such as contact networks, timestamp/transaction order, reputation, content, DNA, human fingerprints, digital fingerprints, contact tracing, digital contracts, etc. There's more than one way to skin a block.

Long story short shorter: the blockchain concept can be used to reliably secure money in a seamless user-friendly way.